NSA Spying Torpedoes American Business Dealings in Europe


Inspector Clouseau
Pink Panther

From the beginning of the NSA mass-surveillance scandal, revelations that the U.S. spy agency was not only scooping up international communications, but had conscripted American companies into the effort have opened doors for foreign firms. Tech companies in other countries are relatively shielded from pressure by U.S. spooks (whatever their relationships with spy agencies in their own countries) and some American entrepreneurs, like Ladar Levison of Lavabit, actively urge people to avoid U.S.-based services. Worse, though, the NSA's connection to some companies is giving European politicians cover to discriminate against American businesses. Never mind that Europeans do their own fair share of spying; they now have legitimate concerns to raise about the security of data in the hands of Apple, AT&T, Google, and other familiar names.

Reports Juergen Baetz of the Associated Press:

BRUSSELS—The backlash in Europe over U.S. spying is threatening an agreement that generates tens of billions of dollars in trans-Atlantic business every year—and negotiations on another pact worth many times more.

A growing number of European officials are calling for the suspension of the "Safe Harbor" agreement that lets U.S. companies process commercial and personal data—sales, emails, photos—from customers in Europe. This little-known but vital deal allows more than 4,200 American companies to do business in Europe, including Internet giants like Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon.

Revelations of the extent of U.S. spying on its European allies is also threatening to undermine one of President Barack Obama's top trans-Atlantic goals: a sweeping free-trade agreement that would add an estimated $138 billion (100 billion euros) a year to each economy's gross domestic product.

The Safe Harbor agreement allows companies to move data around their networks as needed. In its absence, data from Europeans might have to be stored and processed only within the physical confines of Europe—a huge expense and possibly insurmountable hurdle for many companies. Many U.S. companies would effectively be unable to operate in Europe if they were reachable by European law.

Some companies could explicitly be barred from expanding their presence in Europe out of fears that they operate as pipelines to the NSA. According to the Wall Street Journal's Anton Troianovski:

AT&T Inc.'s ambitions to expand in Europe have run into unexpected hurdles amid the growing outcry across the region over surveillance by the National Security Agency. German and other European officials said any attempt by AT&T to acquire a major wireless operator would face intense scrutiny, given the company's work with the U.S. agency's data-collection programs.

Resistance to such a deal, voiced by officials in interviews across Europe, suggests the impact of the NSA affair could extend beyond the diplomatic sphere and damage U.S. economic interests in key markets. AT&T Chief Executive Randall Stephenson has signaled repeatedly in recent months that he is interested in buying a mobile-network operator in Europe, highlighting the potential for growth on the continent at a time when the U.S. company faces headwinds at home.

Some of this resistance to American companies is legitimate; Europeans are as outraged as Americans about the spying scandal—quite possibly more so, given that continent's long history with authoritarian regimes and secret police. And some of these moves are just opportunistic; the NSA has turned into a great excuse for European politicians to openly favor well-connected companie in their own countries at the expense of U.S. firms.

In a recent report (PDF), the European Parliament called out Britain, France, Germany, and Sweden for tapping directly into communications networks—though it insisted "The capacities of Sweden, France and Germany (in terms of budget and human resources) are low compared to the magnitude of the operations launched by GCHQ and the NSA and cannot be considered on the same scale". Germany's BND worked closely with the NSA to facilitate spying, and France's DGSE needed no encouragement to hoover up communications data, though it apparently aided the NSA, as did a counterpart agency in Spain. Britain's GCHQ is reported to have burrowed its way into Begian telecommunications firms in the course of its extensive cooperation with the NSA.

In other words, European government officials are shocked. Shocked!

But, however cynical the response, by compromising the independence of American firms, U.S. officials created a hell of a justification for other countries to torpedo those companies and favor their own.

NEXT: Israel Vows To Prevent Hezbollah From Getting Weapons After Syria Raid

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The backlash in Europe over U.S. spying is threatening an agreement that generates tens of billions of dollars in trans-Atlantic business every year?and negotiations on another pact worth many times more.

    Small price to pay for whatever it is Obama gets out of all this surveillance. And private sector profits aren’t exactly priority one with this administration, save what portion they can tax.

    1. Yeah, but a shrinking tax base is bad for Team Free Stuff.

      1. The size of one’s tax base doesn’t matter. My prog acquaintances keep telling me so, so it must be true. Whatever money is needed will just appear somehow. By the way, yes, I do still believe in Santa Claus; why do you ask?

        1. Whatever money is needed will just appear somehow.

          As long as the Federal Reserve keeps the printing presses going full tilt, it’s all good! What’s this “currency devaluation” hogwash? Must be the latest RIGHTWING RACIST TEABAGGERTHUGLICAN meme!

    2. Didn’t you hear? Obama didn’t even know about this!

      He’s far too busy gabbing with “opinion journalists” to be involved with small matters like international surveillance.

  2. You know who else torpedoed attempts at trans-Atlantic business?

    1. Der Kriegsmarine?

      1. DAS BOOT

    2. Captain Henry Morgan?

  3. One wishes these governments would tell U.S. military to get off their soil. But then, I guess, “outrage” has its limits.

    1. I have seen two demonstrations in Europe, aimed at the US, in person…

      1979 in Amsterdam – a big Yankee Go Home, we hate you ostensibly organized around Nicaragua carping and bitching,

      1997 in Kaiserslautern – a local protest at the very thought/rumor that the US Army was going to close the facilities located there.

  4. It’s really reassuring that the Obama administration has been able to repair the damage to our international relations that Bush caused.

    1. You can just feel the respect and admiration radiating from the Continent.

      1. I can certainly smell it.

  5. Not to worry, when these companies start to really struggle, the government will just step in and bail them out. Too big to fail, afterall.

  6. Alt-Text like this is heartily endorsed, Mr. 2chili!

  7. …and now for really really really important news, Rachel Maddow reports that Rand Paul is a kook that lifts copyrighted Wkipedia phrases and incorporates them into his speeches. He is therefore untrustworthy and as an example, his championing of Snowden is a sure sign of treasonous behavior. Why just today, the traitor, Mr. Snowden, has further undermined trust between Europe and the US through his series of unAmerican leaks….

    1. They seem to have milked the Rand Paul phony scandal for all of its ability to distract, which, for sane people, is little to none. Now, they’re bellyaching about racist Halloween costumes. Not that racist Halloween costumes are a good thing, but how do they even compare to the “favors” that the government keeps doing for us?

      1. Now, they’re bellyaching about racist Halloween costumes.

        In past years we’ve had a few teenagers come by, usually later in the evening, with no costumes on. I was really hoping for one wearing a hoodie just so I could look at them and say “What are you supposed to be, Trayvon Martin?” Alas, I was disappointed, not even one hoodie wearing teen.

    2. On Obamacare fuckuppalluza, I was still in the ‘this may pass and they might git it up to government work standards’ camp.
      That is till I saw this posted on facebook. This means Maddow, the manliest of O’postle, is whipping her interns into cutting and pasting Paul speeches into google. Also she has other interns sifting through Cruz’s sewer and probably has one mole in Boehner’s ass.

      “When the going gets weird, the Weird turn pro.”

      1. …and probably has one mole in Boehner’s ass.

        I though she was the mole on Boehner’s ass… oh wait, you said in Boehners ass, in that case I thought she was the polyp in Boehner’s ass.

    3. Copyrighted? Really?

      1. That was my added hyperbole. Makes it even more sinister. Because, it is oh so sinister.

  8. Time for a Nobel in economics. Krugman has one to spare, he only uses it to scrape his asshole semi-clean.

  9. Pardon monsieur, but do you have a leeesance for zeese torpedoes?

    1. “It’s a minky with a bimb!”


  10. lol, pretty funny when you think about it.


  11. Nobody across the world wants anything to do with the United States from things like this, to the currency. The so called “exceptionalism” is failing.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.