NYC Mayor Bloomberg Vows to Bring Mysterious Art-Nuisance Banksy To Heel
The ever mysterious art nuisance Banksy kindly gave disbelieving New Yorkers in Central Park a chance (that nearly all of them ignored, because, well, Banksy-looking art had become quite the urban cliche these days) to buy his highly valuable originals for $60 a pop this weekend.
Still, an ungrateful New York Mayor Michael "Enemy of Freedom" Bloomberg wants to find out who he really is, and then arrest him, because---graffiti kills, ya'all.

At a press conference yesterday, Bloomberg signaled that Banksy is, and should be, in the NYPD's crosshairs. "Graffiti does ruin people's property and it's a sign of decay and loss of control," the mayor said. "Art is art, and nobody's a bigger supporter of the arts than I am. I just think there are some places for art and there are some places [not for] art. And you running up to somebody's property or public property and defacing it is not my definition of art. Or it may be art, but it should not be permitted. And I think that's exactly what the law says."
According to the Post, the mayor's office says the city will remove any Banksy work on public property, such as the 9/11 installation we discovered at the Brooklyn Promenade…:
The Daily News' source tells a different story, explaining to the tabloid that the Vandal Squad only investigates if "someone complained about it," and "I haven't heard of anyone complaining." Except, of course, for the mayor of the city. But who listens to him?
I think it's pretty clear in libertarian/propertarian terms that graffiti is in fact a crime. And it's slightly less clear that Banksy's schtick can be infuriatingly self-satisfied.
Interestingly, according to this lawyer's website, the severity of the punishment for this sort of vandalism in New York depends on the economic level of damage one has done.
But Banksy-izing your property in fact, in the current art market, increases the value, so who knows how this will all pan out in either law or political philosophy if Gotham's mayor can catch a guy whose secret identity is better protected than the Batman's.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Has Bloomberg checked on the whereabouts of Timothy Hutton?
The rat cameraman piece shown above beats hell out of any of the graffiti from the VCU art students.
Uncontrolled people! Bloomberg's one weakness!
Not his only weakness. Things on high shelves are also a well-known one.
It increases the value of the property until it's stolen. Sorry for the huffpo link.
bah, touchpads.
It increases the value of the property until it's stolen. Sorry for the huffpo link.
Except if you look in the link, the guy leasing the shop in question says the landlord had already told him they were taking the mural, so I'm not sure it's actually stolen.
Ah bad example then. I seem to remember one being chipped out on the sly a year or so ago, but memory is a slippery thing.
Only Bloomberg could make me sympathetic to somebody who's named Banksy and is not a cartoon character.
I must be missing something here. Whats the controversy?
The severity to which you will be charged will depend on the nature and extent of the damage that was done.
The damage done to Bloomberg's ego?
I'm not a fan of Banksy - as far as I'm concerned he's a graffitist and not an artist.
That said, if I'm going to get my wall tagged, I'd rather it by some punk who can do more than poorly spraypaint a gang logo.
Bloomberg's going after Banksy because he's an embarrassment (both of them) to the current regime.
Better than the Obey idiot.
*First world problems*
I'm not sure about that. It is New York...
WE ARE ABOVE THE FIRST WORLD!
-Bloomberg
The great thing about anonymous, anarchistic artists is you can plagiarize and counterfeit their work and there's not much they can do about it.
I don't like the private property damage, but since Bloomberg is upset, I am so torn.
Graffiti is a crime that I, as a libertarian, can't be bothered to give two shits about if it happens.
You have not had any of your personal property graffitied, especially with something you object to?
I'm with you. The only objection I can muster is that for what New Yorkers pay in taxes, the city should be polishing their windows daily (and perhaps their shoes).
The proper contraction of "you all" is "y'all."
"But Banksy-izing your property in fact, in the current art market, increases the value,..."
So Doherty is saying that you really should not object too much if someone forces something on you that other people consider valuable but will cost hundreds to thousands of dollars in material and man-hours for you to get rid of?
And the irony of someone with the name Mickey Rat objecting to property crime is deliciously ironic. (MR was an underground comic character which was a parody of MM; the Disney people considered this a violation of their property rights).
just as Carol responded I didn't know that people can make $6819 in 1 month on the computer. read this
http://WWW.JOBS72.COM
So the NSA hasn't been able to find someone with a can of spray paint?
I thought NYC had drones? Is the CIA on vacation?
I get it now, this is like a Jack the Ripper kind of deal, Banksy, hence part of the name being BANK, is really Bloomberg!