Justices Debate Affirmative Action Ban
Hearing challenge to Michigan law passed by voters
The Supreme Court ventured into the fractious debate over affirmative action Tuesday, hearing a challenge to a statewide ban Michigan voters imposed in 2006 on consideration of race or gender in public education, employment or contracting.
The fate of the measure appeared to be in the hands of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who suggested at the outset of the argument that the Michigan constitutional amendment was clearly invalid under a three-decade-old Supreme Court precedent.
"I have trouble seeing the distinction" between Michigan's ban and a Washington state ban on racial busing that the court struck down in 1982, Kennedy said.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is it a tax?
"Reverse" racism and sexism doesn't exist. Racism is racism, sexism is sexism. It makes no difference what word is placed before it, or even if some feel good name, like "affirmative action" is used in their place.
my buddy's step-aunt makes $73/hour on the laptop. She has been fired for eight months but last month her paycheck was $16318 just working on the laptop for a few hours. official statement ......... http://www.BAM21.CoM