Increase in Shootings Lead To Calls For Stop-and-Frisk To Be Reinstated in NYC
Practice was ruled unconstitutional last month
The surge in shootings since a federal judge ruled against stop-and-frisk is more than a statistic to those affected by the gunfire.
Jorge Alvarez, 44, was shot in both legs when he was caught in the crossfire between two drug gangs on Aug. 13, one day after Manhattan federal Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled the NYPD's use of stop-and-frisk unconstitutional.
(H/T Charles WT)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yes, on the basis of a few shootings lets suspend parts of the Constitution.
Ludicrous.
Right ..... when there's a several decade correlation between more guns and less crime, it's just voodoo statistics and so much nonsense. When there's an increase in crime ONE DAY after stop and frisk is called unconstitutional, BUT NOT STOPPED, that's statistical certainty.