Oregon Court of Appeals: Suspects Have Right to Privacy in Bathroom
Cops can't barge in looking for evidence of illegal activity
The Oregon Court of Appeals expanded the definition of restroom relief with an opinion Wednesday that found police can't barge in on a suspect in a locked bathroom even if he's just waiting them out.
In a decision overturning the 2011 drug conviction of a Portland man, the judges said police conducted a warrantless search that violated the suspect's privacy rights when they used a key to open the locked door of a public restroom where he fled after seeing an officer head his way.
The evidence seized as a result of the illegal search -- a glass pipe with cocaine residue -- shouldn't have been admitted in court, the judges found.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
my best friend's half-sister makes $63 hourly on the internet. She has been out of work for 10 months but last month her pay was $21312 just working on the internet for a few hours. read this post here
http://www.Works23.com