Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Yes, Sen. Ted Cruz Is Still Talking (As of 6:30 AM Eastern)

Scott Shackford | 9.24.2013 9:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | CSPAN
(CSPAN)

Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz is still on the Senate floor waging his not-officially-a-filibuster filibuster to oppose and defund Obamacare, or at least force Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to allow a discussion and vote of possible amendments. At a little over six hours in now, he still has a way to go to catch up with Sen. Rand Paul's 13-hour drone-inspired filibuster from March.

C-Span is still airing the speeches (interrupted with occasional questions — or speeches framed as questions — from friendly senators) here. And yes, a couple of Twitter folks friendly to Cruz's aims have registered the site IsTedCruzStillTalking.com.

Below, Sen. Cruz reads Green Eggs and Ham to his absent daughters as a bedtime story:

UPDATE: Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) has shown up at about 9:00 p.m. to defend Obamacare and actually debate the matter wtih Cruz. (Summary: Cruz knows people Obamacare has hurt. Durbin knows people it has helped.)

UPDATE: Sen. Cruz is still up as the clock strikes midnight in D.C. That puts him at a bit more than 9 hours.

FINAL TUESDAY UPDATE: Sen. Cruz is still at it (with some significant assistance from Utah Sen. Mike Lee) at 1 a.m. in D.C. If he makes it until 3 a.m., he'll beat Sen. Rand Paul's filibuster, though given that this speech isn't actually a filibuster, I suspect it won't be put in the record books.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Archaeologists Find Aphrodite's Head in Southern Turkey

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

PoliticsPolicyObamacareAffordable Care ActTed CruzSenate
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (213)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Sevo   12 years ago

    Over on the Chron comments, he's being accused of sentencing children with cancer to death!
    Yep, he hates the childrunz!

    1. Episiarch   12 years ago

      I would imagine the TEAM BLUE low forheads are currently oscillating between "he's a horrible monster" and "he can't do anything, this isn't a real filibuster". You know, how their opponents are magically both incompetent morons and evil geniuses at the same time.

      1. Sevo   12 years ago

        And by now it is no secret that Obamacare does nearly nothing of what the promo promised.
        But it doesn't matter; those who oppose it are going to kill what it isn't going to do anyhow!

        1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

          Right, and the price of accomplishing nothing has gone from a $200 billion savings, to a cost of $600 billion or more. But we can't afford to not do it.

      2. John   12 years ago

        They are so stupid they are willing to create a national disaster that they are likely to get blamed for creating rather than step back and admit they were wrong. They are just fanatical morons.

        1. Sevo   12 years ago

          "They are so stupid they are willing to create a national disaster that they are likely to get blamed for creating rather than step back and admit they were wrong."

          John, they are in no way going to get blamed.
          Have you seen shreek? It doesn't matter what Obozo does, it's BUSH'S fault. Those guys whining in the comments? Won't matter; when the costs go through the rook, it'll be the insurance companies.
          There is ZERO self-examination here. None. It is *always* someone elses' fault.

          1. John   12 years ago

            The rest of the country won't be as forgiving. You watch. They own this. That is why Reid is so pissed off about this. He knows the last thing the Dems in the Senate want is to have to vote for Obamacare again or to have the news have to associate it with the Democratic Party as a whole rather than the village idiot.

            1. PapayaSF   12 years ago

              In a rational world, Democrats would own this. In the real world of low-information voters and a Democrat media, great effort will be expended to blame Republicans for any and all failures. Just wait: within a few weeks, Obamacare's failures will be Ted Cruz's fault.

              1. John   12 years ago

                It won't work. The media can distract but it can't do that much. They own it. they have to own it. Hell, most of their base is so stupid they are out bragging to their friends about it.

              2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

                In the real world of low-information voters and a Democrat media, great effort will be expended to blame Republicans for any and all failures.

                Which is why actions like this are essential - keep the morons defending their abortion of a reform.

      3. Mint Berry Crunch   12 years ago

        I think I'm doing the double blockquote thing from now on.

        You know, how their opponents are magically both incompetent morons and evil geniuses at the same time.

        Well, don't forget that dyslexic retard George W. Hitler somehow managed to trick many smart Democrats into backing him on Iraq.

        1. OldMexican   12 years ago

          Re: Mint Berry Crunch,

          I think I'm doing the double blockquote thing from now on.

          Isn't it bitchin'???

          1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

            If you can read this, you don't need glasses.

            1. Sevo   12 years ago

              Yes, I do.

            2. OldMexican   12 years ago

              Shit... I do need glasses.

            3. sticks   12 years ago

              I can read it with my glasses on.

          2. Mint Berry Crunch   12 years ago

            Isn't it bitchin'???

            It's sweeter than Yoo-Hoo.

            I can't remember who I saw do it first the other day. Did you invent it?

            1. OldMexican   12 years ago

              I discovered by accident some time ago but now use it like I use underwear... that is almost every time.

          3. Archduke of Pantsfan   12 years ago

            o

            o

            o

            o

            o

            oo

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      Yet, whenever a person says preventing GM food sentences people to death in poor countries they laugh or claim it makes no sense.

  2. Slammer   12 years ago

    Dick Durbin Derp Derp Derp

    1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      Can't take much more Durbin

    2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      Derp

      Derp

      Derp

      Derp

    3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      Shriek on Durbin

      Slurp

      Slurp

      Slurp

      Slurp

      Slurp

      Slurp

  3. Ted S.   12 years ago

    Have you got any Reason-Rupe polls on what the public thinks of Sen. Cruz's speech?

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   12 years ago

      Broken out by Republican, Democrat, and Independent, of course.

  4. LilDebbie   12 years ago

    Durbin, you mendacious shitbag, your employer, the American people, through an amendment put into law by their duly elected representatives, voted to kick your ass to the exchanges without any employer contribution. That is what the law says, and if you won't follow the law, we won't either.

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      If the Republicans had any intelligence, they'd make this a top campaign point.

      But they're stupid, and venal enough that they want the power to do this themselves on other issues.

      1. John   12 years ago

        That and how they delayed the employer mandate to provide insurance but refuse to even consider delaying the mandate on voters to buy insurance.

  5. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    Get down, Cruzzavala!

  6. John   12 years ago

    http://blogs.news.com.au/heral.....l_warming/

    It is amazing how stupid these people are. They are all shreek level stupid. They all sit around and tell the same lies to each other just knowing it is the truth.

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      DAVID SUZUKI: Well, I mean, that is always the argument that's made. GMOs are very, very expensive. Now, the people that need this food are not going to be able to afford it.

      The guy is a complete ass.

      1. Sevo   12 years ago

        "GMOs are very, very expensive."

        They are so expensive that poor farmers plant them to make money! It's MAGIC!

        1. Ted S.   12 years ago

          They are so expensive that poor farmers plant them to make money! It's MAGIC!

          Never believe it's not so.

          1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

            Thank you for that horrific flashback to my childhood. Could have gone the rest of my life without hearing that again.

            1. Swiss Servator, Spare a Franc?   12 years ago

              Seconded. Violently so.

      2. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        This guy is the prototypical environmentalist. He has the illusions of expertise, but when it comes down to it, he is an ideological fuck. He opposes nuclear power for christ sakes. Get a grip David.

      3. Paul.   12 years ago

        It's no longer 1996. No one listens to David Suzuki.

        He made a name for himself as Canada's affable "people's" scientist. Then he went off the rails in the advocacy industry.

        He's done.

      4. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        Suzuki has pulled a fast one on the CBC and Canadian public. He's revered up here and never quite understood why.

  7. Rich   12 years ago

    Cruz: "We should have a debate about the role of government."

    Right on, Ted! To get things started, just whip out a copy of the Constitution and read it.

  8. Slammer   12 years ago

    Just once I would love to see a guy filibustering keep talking, step behind a chair, and piss in a Gatorade bottle, then step back to the podium

    1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      CSPAN is very careful about camera angles.

      "hang on, I'm just going to step over to Senator Durbin's desk"

    2. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P5M3EyCnfo

  9. OldMexican   12 years ago

    Summary: Cruz knows people Obamacare has hurt.

    Like me.

    Durbin knows people it has helped.

    Like him.

  10. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Alright, so when is he going to break out Fifty Shades of Grey?

    1. John   12 years ago

      No, he is going old school, Story of O

    2. Hillary's Clitdong   12 years ago

      When is he going to start reading it in the voice of Gilbert Gottfried?

  11. Alice Bowie   12 years ago

    Keep Talking Cruz...
    Keep Talking

    Lucky for you, most people in this country don't have kids with diseases that the insurance companies would like to weasal out of paying.

    Luckily, there's a Black president in the White house. Had this been the same guy and NOT BLACK...the EXACT SAME GUY, we'd have no tea party, and Obamacare.

    Obamacare would have been much better had he kept the PUBLIC OPTION and allow all over 50 years of age to apply for Medicare. Today, there's a gap between 50-65 in which people are getting sick, are un-insurable, and we the tax payer have to pick up. I would have so much prefer as a tax payer to have 50-65yo on Medicare than pay ER or other coverage. Had Obama been named John White, and been white, I don't think we'd have any of these problems.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Had Obama been white, he would have never been elected with his links to radical figures like Wright and Ayers and his total lack of a resume. Hell he would have never run.

      Moreover, if Obama had been white and elected, he would have necessarily had more experience and more of a plan and never shot his mouth off about health care the way he did in 07 and there never would have been an Obamacare. Chances are, the Dems would still control the house and the economy would have had a reasonable recovery had Obamacare no inflicted so much uncertainty on business.

      Yeah, being black really didn't help Obama or the Democrats when you look at the whole story.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        Only ignorant wingnecks ever gave a damn about a couple of nobodies like Rev Wright and Bill Ayers.

        1. LilDebbie   12 years ago

          Obama's an ignorant redneck?

          1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            No. In reality Obama is a nerdy geek. Harvard Law Magna cum laude and lousy athlete combined.

            1. OldMexican   12 years ago

              Re: Palin's Buttwipe,

              No.

              But, you just suggested he was just a few minutes ago: "Only ignorant wingnecks ever gave a damn about a couple of nobodies like Rev Wright and Bill Ayers." And I believe you were being sincere. Am I wrong?

              He gave a damn about Rev. Wright for 20 years, and Ayers for about as long. Ayers even wrote Obama's autobiography. That says much.

            2. Rabban   12 years ago

              Wait, you know his unreleased College Records? hmmm, BS detected.

        2. John   12 years ago

          In a sense that is true. Stupid white people like you were too interested in voting for a black man. And the result of course is that Obama is in the process of destroying the entire country's trust in government. It is almost like the Libertarians created him as some kind of Manchurian candidate or something. Liberals like you are so stupid and easily lead, all it took was the right black man and you charged off the cliff.

          You are retarded shreek. But you make up for it by being profoundly ignorant and hateful. No go rant a dumpster or something so the adults can talk.

    2. John   12 years ago

      But I will give you credit Alice. You are about the only liberal I know who is starting to figure out that people are not going to care how many people Obamacare "helps" when the cost is real and assessed on them. Prog programs only work if you can convince people someone else will pay for them.

    3. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      Yes, Alice, in a sane country the health insurance cartel would be public enemy #1.

      But Obama is sekret Muslim! (according to wingnut myth)

      1. John   12 years ago

        Hold it, this morning you were telling us obamacare was wonderful and Cruz was terrified of it working. Now, Obama is evil for not breaking up the cartel?

        Jesus fucking Christ, you have mixed up the talking points again, you little retard. Tell you what, tell your handlers to call me. I can post their dipshit talking points under my own sock puppet. At least the sock puppet talking points will be right. You fuck them up so badly are so whacked out on lithium or whatever the hell the doctors at the state hospital give you, you can't even cut and paste them properly

      2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

        in a sane country the health insurance cartel would be public enemy #1.

        How dare companies offer insurance? How dare they?

      3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        Palin's Buttplug|9.24.13 @ 10:17PM|#

        Yes, Alice, in a sane country the health insurance cartel would be public enemy #1.

        Which is why Barack created Obamacare to enrich them.

      4. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        Yes, replace the insurance "cartel" with a government one.

        Solved!

        Sigh.

    4. Sevo   12 years ago

      Alice Bowie|9.24.13 @ 10:03PM|#
      "Lucky for you, most people in this country don't have kids with diseases that the insurance companies would like to weasal out of paying."

      Yes, you lying pile of shit, you know full well that Obozocare isn't doing one bit to help that.
      But that doesn't stop ignoramuses like you from promo'ing it! It's all about intent; The fact that it'll cause deaths is irrelevant to shitpiles like you, Alice.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        Quit being an ignorant douchebag, Sevo. The ACA prevents rescission.

        1. Sevo   12 years ago

          Palin's Buttplug|9.24.13 @ 10:29PM|#
          "Quit being an ignorant douchebag, Sevo. The ACA prevents rescission"

          Sure it does, shitbag, along with cancer, high costs, death and uh,...
          Go fuck your daddy.

    5. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: Alice Bowie,

      Lucky for you, most people in this country don't have kids with diseases that the insurance companies would like to weasal out of paying.

      That is such an unrecognized truth, Alice. Thank you for pointing it out. It suggests the question why are we required to pay through the nose, leaving our OWN kids without food, just so in the odd chance a kid is host to rare and exotic diseases, his parents won't have to pay themselves to keep the little bastard alive.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        See, you have proven to be smarter than Sevo if nothing else.

        But that is the essence of insurance - community rating. Yes, millions of healthy kids parents will pay a few dollars more to pay for that cancer stricken kid.

        When the market does it it is called "insurance". When you opt out you are known as a "freeloader".

        1. John   12 years ago

          But that is the essence of insurance - community rating.

          Sometimes you say something so stupid an irrational and such a fucked up distortion of even the liberal talking points, you even amaze me.

        2. OldMexican   12 years ago

          Re: Palin's Buttwipe,

          Yes, millions of healthy kids parents will pay a few dollars more to pay for that cancer stricken kid.

          You seem to have missed the point. Why are millions of parents compelled to pay "a few dollars more" for anything? Why am I being compelled to do so?

          When you opt out you are known as a "freeloader".

          Not unless I pay for my things myself. As far as I can see, it is the parents of the cancer-stricken kid who are free-loading, if what you describe is true: that millions of parents are made to pay more for their insurance so the parents of that cancer-stricken child don't have to pay what they should.

          When the market does it it is called "insurance".

          What are you calling "insurance"?

        3. Jordan   12 years ago

          The essence of insurance is the pricing of risk, you fascist fuck.

        4. Sevo   12 years ago

          You have proven yourself to be dumber than shreek:
          "But that is the essence of insurance - community rating"
          And that's truly off the bottom of the scale.

          1. Jordan   12 years ago

            Is this in response to me? Because I was responding to shreek.

            This isn't a controversial statement. (PDF)

            1. Sevo   12 years ago

              No, damn threaded comments;
              Shreek has proven himself dumber than shreek.
              Sorry; should have stuck some quoted comment in there. Too easy to misunderstand.

              1. Jordan   12 years ago

                I see. Yeah he does prove himself dumber with each comment.

        5. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          But that is the essence of insurance - community rating.

          fascinating

        6. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

          Palin, no you dirtbag, it's not the fucking essence of insurance.

          It's like progressives get to invent anything they want under any definition. It's...weird.

    6. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      Fuck you, Alice.

      My daughter has a serious chronic illness. I know too well the "per-existing condition" game, but you don't get to use her as a prop for your wealth redistribution agitprop.

      1. OldMexican   12 years ago

        Re: Heroic Mulatto,

        I hope with all my heart that everything goes well for your daughter.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          Same here HM.

        2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

          Thank you OM and FdA.

      2. Sevo   12 years ago

        "My daughter has a serious chronic illness."

        Somehow, I have a feeling you'll do better dealing with that than Obamacare ever would.
        All the best.

      3. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

        Whatever it is, good luck HM.

      4. DEG   12 years ago

        I hope things go well for your daughter.

    7. Jordan   12 years ago

      John Edwards was white Obama. How did he fare, you racebaiting prick?

      1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        Nope,

        John Edwards had a successful pre politics career, even if it was looting the public via the court system.

        Obama didn't even have that going for him.

    8. Red Rocks Rockin   12 years ago

      Lucky for you, most people in this country don't have kids with diseases that the insurance companies would like to weasal out of paying.

      "Kids! WITH DISEASES!!"

  12. Duck Dynasty is Great   12 years ago

    I would respectfully request him to read my Duck Dynasty fan slashfic.

    In it, Si sneaks up to Phil while he's sleeping. He squats over his face, and begins to defecate messy diarrhea onto Phil's face. Phil wakes up with a start, but then, seeing that his longtime fantasy is finally coming true, grips Si's pale white buttocks and smashes his face into Si's messy asshole. Phil then rims Si out for several minutes, while Si masturbates furiously. At the last second. he spins around and ejaculates onto Phil's face. Phil then uses Si's beard to wipe off his shit and cum covered face, and they agree never to speak of it again.

    That's just a summary, but I've emailed the story in it's entirety to Sen. Cruz's staff in hopes it can get read on national television.

    1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      Leave the slashfic to SugarFree, please.

      1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

        I'm waiting for SugarFree's magnum opus and the love story for the ages:

        STEVE SMITH meets Trevor Phillips.

    2. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      What do you call an act like that?

      1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        A Duck Commando?

      2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        The Elite-ocrats?

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          Do you know how much I hate the fact that YOU were the only one who got that.

          Don't talk to me. I despise you.

      3. Bam!   12 years ago

        Redneck Foie Gras

  13. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

    Fuck. Shitstopper, Alice...all we need is Tony and muriken.

    Speaking of assholes, anyone seen our favorite weightlifting, surfing, Morgan Fairchild fucking, super cop lately? Been kinda nice around here not having to worry about my dogs getting shot.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Shreek is just retarded. Alice actually knows the talking points. Reading Alice tells you how progs are going to rationalize this train wreck. And it is going to be "America just didn't care about the uninsured and that is why they hated Obamacare".

      1. Sevo   12 years ago

        ..."Reading Alice tells you how progs are going to rationalize this train wreck. And it is going to be "America just didn't care about the uninsured and that is why they hated Obamacare"."

        Exactly. Alice's sleazy lies telegraph just how brain-deads are going to justify failure.
        It *won't* be by accepting blame.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

          Every day at the same time progs plug in their semi-functional brains to the main switchboard in Flin, Flon Manitoba.

  14. G-dub   12 years ago

    From David Corn over at Mother Jones:

    "Obama and his team have done a poor job of promoting his successes, which sometimes are nuanced and complicated."

    Hear that everybody? The complexity of Dear Leader's greatness is just lost on us lowly peasants.

    1. John   12 years ago

      Obama's fault is that he just doesn't talk enough or take enough credit. If Obama would just make his presidency more about him, he would do better.

      Wow.

      1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

        Obama, the Great Post Partisan Pontificator.

        THAT IS WHAT THEY REALLY BELIEVE

      2. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

        Team Obama: There's no problem that can't be solved with a teleprompter and a flashy inforgraphic.

    2. PapayaSF   12 years ago

      Partisan defenses are so often amusing. We see Democrats claiming that a good Dow Jones number means things are great! I have a Facebook friend whose list of Obama accomplishments included... a commission that he formed! A frackin' commission! The straw, she is grasped....

    3. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      Maybe he should give another speech.

      He does that so well.

    4. Sevo   12 years ago

      "Obama and his team have done a poor job of promoting his successes, which sometimes are nuanced and complicated."

      Well, if you spell "failures" as "nuanced and complicated", there might be a point there.

    5. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      That sentence is the main reason I've stopped listening to anyone who lies on the left side of the spectrum.

      They're vapid and they're arrogant at the same time.

  15. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

    What?

    1. Archduke of Pantsfan   12 years ago

      does it come in Men's XXXL?

      asking for a friend.

  16. Archduke of Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Real life 'Breaking Bad' Couple

    1. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      They were sentenced in a British court yesterday to a combined eight years' jail.
      Within a year of their first crop, the Wrights were heading a multi-million dollar empire, using Vietnamese immigrants as cheap labour.
      Over five years, they produced dope worth nearly $7 million at seven factories across Kent, where they lived.

      Why are they going to jail? Sounds like they actually benefited everyone involved: pot-smokers got their pot, the Vietnamese immigrants got jobs and money, and the couple profited.

      Judge Michael Carroll acknowledged the role of tragic grief in the couple's downfall, but said their actions were unacceptable.
      "It may have affected your judgment and made you more vulnerable but you were an extremely active and involved conspirator," he said of Mr Wright.

      Fuck you, asshole. I'm still demanding the state produce a victim.

      1. Ted S.   12 years ago

        The state didn't get its cut. They consider themselves the victim.

  17. Archduke of Pantsfan   12 years ago

    David Suzuki says people who disagree with him on climate change should be criminally charged.

    1. John   12 years ago

      See my link above. Suzuki is profoundly ignorant about the subject. But that won't stop him form demanding people go to jail.

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      David Suzuki is beginning to grasp at straws now that the catastrophe seems to be receding in the distance.
      He continues to get air time and ink like that charlatan Ehrlich for the same reasons.

    3. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

      The Aussies on that site seem pretty solidly in support of Suzuki.

    4. Ted S.   12 years ago

      And there's a huge swath of the intelligentsia that has people like Suzuki at the top of their Rolodex to comment on the issues of the day.

    5. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      "If we don't listen to science, what are we going to turn to ? the Bible? the Qur'an? An advertising agency? Australians are at a very critical time. You had a mechanism where science could be provided, with no commitment one way or the other, so that you could make up your own mind. By shutting that down, what does that tell you?

      "Mother Earth is giving you the signals in Australia, loud and clear," he said.

      I reject your vengeful cosmic deity with its circumcised priesthood and substitute my vengeful earth deity with its labcoated priesthood.

      1. Sevo   12 years ago

        "Mother Earth is giving you the signals in Australia, loud and clear," he said."

        Anyone who cites "mother earth" is no longer engaged in rational discussion.
        That is a purely religious concept; there is NO room in a scientific discussion for a "mother" anything.
        Fuck you, Suzuki, with Ehrlich's dick.

      2. Old Man With Candy   12 years ago

        labcoated priesthood

        As a working scientist, I highly resent this. None of those guys has gotten near a lab since perhaps their freshman year in college, much less worn a lab coat (except as a costume).

    6. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Yet he is against nuclear power. The guy is dumb. If you are truly worried about CO2, nuclear power is your ONLY answer. Wind/solar are useless in most places and hydro is reaching its limits of installation.

      1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

        It's funny. Everybody understood this my freshman year in college. When I was at [unnamed electric power research ... outfit], everyone understood this. That people who don't understand thermo 101 (and this includes Bailey) dominate media and politics is extremely depressing, even if it's par for the course.

    7. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      The comments.

      My eyes. They burn.

  18. Archduke of Pantsfan   12 years ago

    The best part of this Cruz thing is how apoplectic twitter is becoming over it.
    It's so beautiful!

    1. Slammer   12 years ago

      Someone said Cruz should start reading the list of HHS waiver recipients.

      1. Swiss Servator, Spare a Franc?   12 years ago

        That is brilliant!

  19. The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc   12 years ago

    Sadbeard: Ted Cruz reading Green Eggs & Ham is ironic because it has a progressive message

    Admittedly, Green Eggs and Ham lacks the overt left-wing politics of a Butter Battle Book or The Lorax but this is still a progressive book. In broad strokes, it's a book advocating openness to experience?one of the key moral dimensions on which liberals and conservatives differ.

    In the specific context of the health care debate, though, I'm reminded of Nancy Pelosi's much-mocked remark that "We have to pass the bill so that you can find our what is in it."
    What she was expressing was the idea that while the health reform bill may not have been popular, the health reform law would prove popular in practice once it was in effect. People would like their subsidies and their regulatory protections, and wouldn't want to see them repealed. She was making, specificaly, a kind of Green Eggs and Ham argument. The narrator keeps insisting that he hates green eggs and ham, but he's never had green eggs and ham. When he finally tries them?he likes them!
    The Democrats' bet on the Affordable Care Act is that it's like green eggs and ham?they're convinced the public will like it when they try it.

    You're a moron, Mr. Yglesias. You really are a fool.

    1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

      Nancy Pelosi is your mom, Barack Obama is your dad. When they tell you to eat your green eggs and ham, it's because they're the parents, you're the child, and they know what's best for you. You are, in no way a rational actor. You are merely a child who needs mommy and daddy government to tell you what to do.

      Way to infantilize the American public, Yglesias. Hard to believe someone actually pays him to step on his own dick.

      1. Alien Invader   12 years ago

        Well. If he can really and actually step on it, I've got a suspicion there are people who'd pay him.

        But not for his intellect.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

          "Matthew Yglesias is Slate's business and economics correspondent."

          And then Slate publishes that trash?

          Who runs that pathetic site anyway?

  20. Don Mynack   12 years ago

    Can one of the big brain liberals out there explain to me what exactly these billion-dollar "insurance exchanges" are going to do that an insurance broker already does...for free?

    1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      Give you gubmint subsidies.

      1. #   12 years ago

        ^^this^^

        It's basically just a more clunky ehealthinsurance.com except it will connect into all your personal data that various government agencies have on you to determine how big of a government handout you get.

        If the handout is bigger than the increase in base premium caused by the law you now get "discounted" insurance. If the handout is smaller that he increase in premium you pay more.

        It will all depend on how risky you currently are to insure and what your current income is.

  21. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

    http://www.economics21.org/com.....rve-upward

    Yesterday, over at my Forbes blog, my colleague Chris Conover paid tribute to those three Harvard economists and their favored president, by employing the same arithmetic they did to calculate how much more Americans would spend on health care due to Obamacare. He took the $621 billion, divided by the U.S. population, and multiplied by four.


    "Simplistic?" Chris asked. "Maybe, but so too was the President's campaign promise. And this approach allows us to see just how badly that promise fell short of the mark. Between 2014 and 2022, the increase in national health spending (which the Medicare actuaries specifically attribute to the law) amounts to $7,450 per family of 4." Chris put together a chart that compared Obama's 2008 promise to the Obama administration's 2013 projection:

    As you might expect, certain corners of the Left were not happy. Igor Volsky of ThinkProgress put up a blog post claiming that Conover's math was "totally wrong," because a couple of pro-Obamacare economists told him so. Paul Van de Water, a progressive budget wonk, "described this calculation as one of the stupidest things he's read in a long time."

    1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      (Van de Water, for reasons unclear, did not offer his assessment of the intelligence of the president or his three Harvard advisers. I asked Judd Legum, the editor of ThinkProgress, if his site had ever run a comparable critique of Obama's 2008 promise; he declined to answer.)

      Van de Water told Igor that the cost of college education doesn't increase if the federal government subsidizes college education; therefore, the cost of health care doesn't increase if the federal government subsidizes health care.

      1. Sevo   12 years ago

        "Van de Water told Igor that the cost of college education doesn't increase if the federal government subsidizes college education; therefore, the cost of health care doesn't increase if the federal government subsidizes health care."

        So the concept of 'perverse incentive' is false?

        1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          Who are you to question a progressive budget wonk?

        2. Alien Invader   12 years ago

          No no no, you're on the entirely wrong track.

          To speak of "incentives" is to imply "individuals" exist and that they can actually make choices.

          The purpose of socialism (and ObamaCare) is to eliminate the need for choice. Or any sense of individual self, for that matter.

          But hey, I'm just a small headed non-liberal alien creature.

        3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

          Van de Water told Igor that the cost of college education doesn't increase if the federal government subsidizes college education

          1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

            HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

            Well at least he has a future in comedy.

      2. robc   12 years ago

        Van de Water told Igor that the cost of college education doesn't increase if the federal government subsidizes college education

        Where has he been the last 30 years? How can a human be that stupid?

  22. Sevo   12 years ago

    Oh, and Fred over here ( http://www.sfgate.com/news/tex.....838998.php ) is apparently causing some difficulty.
    The lefties are now telling him to 'give it a rest' rather than arguing...

  23. Alien Invader   12 years ago

    Yes, Sen. Ted Cruz Is Still Talking

    If only this guy's main ingredients weren't spelled "idiot".

  24. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

    Chris Mathews on MSLSD was blowing a gasket, like never before, over Cruz tonight. In less that ten minutes he called or compared Cruz to

    1) Slim pickens riding the H-Bomb to glory in Dr Strangelove

    2) Joe McCarthy

    3) Satan

    4) A Stasi agent in East Germany

    5) Sarah Palin

    6) A tea orrist

    7) Saddam Hussein

    8) Bull Connor

    9) A rich snob that hated non rich kids

    10) Huey Long

    11) A noveau rich poseur

    I thought that Chrissy M was going to stroke out live on TV.

    1. Pathogen   12 years ago

      "I thought that Chrissy M was going to stroke out live on TV."

      We couldn't get that lucky, but I would settle for him inserting a carnivorous earwig in to his ear, to begin to apologize for himself... for our viewing entertainment....

      1. Tejicano   12 years ago

        That would end up one emaciated little earwig. Hardly a snack in there from what I've heard eminating from its piehole. Do you really hate bugs that much?

    2. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      Maybe my rich folk stereotypes are out-of-date, but 9 and 11 seem contradictory.

      I'd put the other into two categories.

      comparisons only Chris could make:

      1,3,6,7,10

      comparisons contractually obligated by MSNBC :

      2,4,5,8

  25. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

    Guess what enlightened genius said, "Here's your Monday geography refresher, Kenya is located on the northern coast of Africa."

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/tou.....sly-wrong/

    1. Pathogen   12 years ago

      What? It's "north-ish", it's certainly further north than... South Africa. You're being pedantic, splitting hairs here.

      1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

        Dude. Geography is, like, a totally Eurocentric concept and stuff. Toure was too busy doing hard-hitting journalism, interviewing musicians and DJs and such, to study maps that some dead white guy drew at least 100 years ago.

        Oh, and...RACISM.

        1. Pathogen   12 years ago

          Exactly, because while the fuck-ups were wasting their time and money in collage, studying shit like "Geography"... a subject that nobody uses... Toure was grabbing the brass ring, and studying journalism... to our benefit, so he could impart his wisdom on us for the good of humanity... Not like those geography studying mouth-breathers could of cut it in Journalism school anyway...

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

            What difference does it make anyway where Kenya is? It can be in Asia for all I care. It doesn't take away from his point. All you teabaggers are using this meaningless mistake to project your own racism and ignorance. Why can't you just argue based on the facts?

            Oh and way to go misquoting him. Maybe Yglesias can chime in and explain to us why Kenya is actually part of North Africa.

    2. JeremyR   12 years ago

      I hate to defend him, but a lot of times people mean "Sub-Sahara Africa" as opposed to the literal Africa.

      Like you know, African-Americans. They aren't talking about Berbers from North Africa.

      In that case, it is in the North part.

      1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

        Kenya isn't in "the North part" of SSA unless you ignore Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Ethiopia.

        And he said "northern coast" anyways. WTF are you talking about?

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      And they call Fox 'faux.'

      /pounds head on desk.

  26. Plopper   12 years ago

    The Green Eggs and Ham reading seems somehow creepy to me and talking about his daughters seems more of a ploy to make him seem like a family man.

    "Look I have daughters and I'm talking to them from afar, I must be such a nice nice family man with lots of good ol' family values."

    I really don't trust this guy. If he wanted to kill time reading the Constitution or the Federalist Papers or something would have been much more appropriate.

    I think he's trying to play sorta like Rand Paul but with a more DeMint type social conservative thing going on...

    But maybe I'm just paranoid...

    What's his positions on the WoD, mandatory minimums and foreign military interventions?

    If it's the typical SoCon dreck plus maybe some lip service to less military spending then I'm staying wary.

    1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      I've relayed your concerns to corner guy. I'll let you know if I hear back. (Note: I only asked him about him specific questions raised by internet commentator Plopper, e.g. "whether he's sorta like Ron Paul but with a more DeMint type social conservative thing going on...

      But maybe I'm just paranoid...")

      1. Plopper   12 years ago

        I'm saying I'm worried he's an establishment hack trying to rise above Rand with the SoCon base.

        Not Ron...

        1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          I have now relayed Plopper's concerns about a potential coup de gras regarding some guy (Cluz I think) rising above Rand with some SoCon jiujitsu.

          1. Plopper   12 years ago

            Well, I do like corner guy. He has good tastes in film. (The Big Lebowski for example).

            Maybe corner guy is an indication that Cluz isn't so bad.

            1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

              Quit giving a shit about Cruz. He's good now. He'll be mostly awful later. That's how people, especially politicians, work.

              The Chinamen is not the issue.

  27. Tman   12 years ago

    If you are a libertarian minded individual you should be raising a glass to Ted Cruz tonight for standing athwart history yelling stop.

    If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything, and Obamacare is a hill worth dying on if you believe that the govt has gone too far. I can't see what else is worth fighting for at this point. Insurance is no longer insurance when you force companies to budget for "pre-existing" conditions. The game is up.

    Lose this hill and its over.

    1. Plopper   12 years ago

      Maybe so, but I just hope what he would replace it with wouldn't be some statist crap either.

      Even without Obamacare we've got serious problems with the insurance and health care markets, due to the horrible, just horrible regulatory environment.

      I almost think that letting Obamacare get implemented might help turn people away from such solutions. Where when things continue to get worse even without Obamacare everyone will blame it on the "teathuglicans" and libertarians as usual.

      1. Tman   12 years ago

        I agree with your point that we have other problems besides this one, but "letting Obamacare get implemented" is not only going to destroy what's left of the economy, but will also set a precedent that will irreparably distort the relationship between a "right" and liberty.

        Things can always get worse too, I suppose.

        1. Plopper   12 years ago

          but will also set a precedent that will irreparably distort the relationship between a "right" and liberty.

          SCOTUS and congress have already done this as far as I'm concerned.

          I think a taste of chaos may be necessary to prod people in the right direction.

          1. Tman   12 years ago

            "SCOTUS and congress have already done this as far as I'm concerned."

            Agreed, which is why I support any and all efforts to reverse it. Defund it, revoke it, shut the whole damn thing down, I don't care. This is a hill worth dying on.

            "I think a taste of chaos may be necessary to prod people in the right direction."

            The last time that happened was during the Revolution. It's not going to happen again anytime soon.

            1. Nando   12 years ago

              how dare poor people think they should have access to affordable medical care!

              I SAID HOW DARE THEY

            2. Plopper   12 years ago

              I don't mean that level of chaos... just a "taste".

              1. Tman   12 years ago

                That won't be enough, and by then it will be too late, which is my point.

              2. Plopper   12 years ago

                Also... I don't just mean Obamacare being passed by congress and stamped as OK by SCOTUS... I mean Medicare, Medicaid, SS etc etc etc.

                I was very very scared and argued a lot with people who were pro Obamacare and pro "Public Option", before it passed...

                Now though, I just feel defeated and want them to taste the pain.

  28. Nando   12 years ago

    Incinerate the Poor. Women are brood mares & nothing more. #MakeDCListen #StandWithCruz

    1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      WTF? It's still 'fatten up the poor' season.

      1. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

        How can we fatten up the poor when they are "food insecure"?

        1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          GMO's dude. How is this not obvious?

  29. Archduke von Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Make me a sammich.

  30. Nando   12 years ago

    Ted Cruz has now stood on his feet and talked for eight hours. Or, as anyone with a minimum wage job calls it, "a day shift."

    1. Pathogen   12 years ago

      Sooo... you stand on your feet at work for 8hrs at a time?

      1. Nando   12 years ago

        I did when I was minimum wage.

        1. Pathogen   12 years ago

          How long do you stand on your feet at work now?

          1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

            however long it takes to get a tub of ice cream from his mom's refrigerator?

          2. Anonymous Coward   12 years ago

            Trick question is obvious. Nando went from spending eight hours a day on his fee to spending eight hours on his knees.

            1. Pathogen   12 years ago

              His "employers" don't provide health insurance (maybe a condom)... I'm beginning to understand his conundrum now...

          3. Nando   12 years ago

            I don't see how that changes my opinion on the working poor?

    2. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

      What about those who work "the night shift?" What do they call it?

      1. Nando   12 years ago

        Hard.

        1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          Maybe if they weren't so damn soft, the act of 'standing up' for '8 whole hours' wouldn't be so hard.

          1. Nando   12 years ago

            There's nothing soft about standing for 8 hours a day. What are you smoking?

            1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

              I stand all day because sitting hurts my back. It's at most a mild inconvenience.

              1. Nando   12 years ago

                so what makes Cruz's speech so profound?

                1. Pathogen   12 years ago

                  Define "profound", in your opinion...

                  1. Nando   12 years ago

                    if you don't know what words mean, why are you talking with adults?

                    1. Pathogen   12 years ago

                      If you can't answer a straight forward question, why are *you* talking with adults?

                    2. Nando   12 years ago

                      I find Cruz's rambling pointless.
                      The point of the blog post is that his talking has some relevance.
                      What say you?

                    3. Pathogen   12 years ago

                      I haven't heard his speech, but I suspect the purpose of his inane ramblings transcend the content... Who knows...

                2. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

                  Wait ... what? I haven't even hear Cruz's speech.

      2. Pathogen   12 years ago

        Filibusterers?

  31. SIV   12 years ago

    And to think Nick Gillespie called Ted Cruz a xenophobic bum.

    1. Pathogen   12 years ago

      It's probably Ted's lack of fashion pizzazz... I've never seen Cruz wearing a leather jacket...

      1. Plopper   12 years ago

        What are his positions on the WoD and immigration?

        If he's still on board with mandatory minimums etc then I don't really have much praise for the guy.

        Correct me if I am wrong about his positions though.

        1. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

          then I don't really have much praise for the guy.

          WTF. He's doing good now. He'll do awful later. Just like all the other politicians. And frankly, like all other humans. Attempting to put humans in 'the good bin' and 'the bad bin' is mostly pointless.

          1. Plopper   12 years ago

            Attempting to put humans in 'the good bin' and 'the bad bin' is mostly pointless.

            Probably so...

    2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      And to think Nick Gillespie called Ted Cruz a xenophobic bum. For the same reason that the Beltway bubbloids hate Cruz.

      He doesn't give a shit about the cocktail partiez.

  32. Nando   12 years ago

    Strange that a Canadian-Cuban like Cruz would fight against health care 🙂

    I guess, for the tea baggers, it's best if people who can't afford health care just die.

    Remember, all members of Congress and the Senate have full, 100% taxpayer paid health care. Cruz might be accused of having principles if he was looking to vote that down as well.

    1. Pathogen   12 years ago

      "I guess, for the tea baggers, it's best if people who can't afford health care just die."

      Like when you go to the death panels rationing boards, because the government can't afford your health care and would prefer you just die.

      1. JeremyR   12 years ago

        So basically like what people without insurance do now? Or those with awful insurance?

        There is X amount of health care. Right now there is enough to go around because a good portion of the country doesn't have access to it.

        For a good portion of this country, the only help for health care is either go to a free clinic and hope you win the lottery to get treatment (which you probably won't) or go to an emergency room and stiff the hospital when they send you an enormous bill (pretending to be an illegal alien helps)

        Now it's certainly true that Obamacare likely won't change this much, and will likely reduce X by making medical care more expensive and discouraging doctors from working as hard or young people from becoming doctors in the first place. But let's not pretend that the current health care system in this country is anything but a disaster.

        1. PM   12 years ago

          So basically like what people without insurance do now? Or those with awful insurance?

          The price mechanism != a central government rationing scheme. It's the difference between passing on buying bread because it goes up to $30/loaf and having to sit in a bread line for 12 hours and be told to go home because there's not enough bread to go around. If you can't recognize the difference, the fall of communist Russia must be positively baffling for you.

          In point of fact, a lot of the reason the current health care system is so dysfunctional is because of the already existing massive distortions of government in the health care market.

    2. PM   12 years ago

      I guess, for the tea baggers, it's best if people who can't afford health care just die.

      Your shtick is 4 years old. It's high time for some new material. Refresh your RSS feeds once in a while FFS.

    3. Fluffy   12 years ago

      We already have a program for people who can't afford health care.

      It's called Medicaid.

      Obamacare is about brutalizing people who have made the economically rational decision to not buy insurance (especially community-rated insurance) to bring down premiums for people who, frankly, actuarially don't deserve lower premiums and who haven't exhausted their resources enough to qualify for Medicaid.

      I don't see why I should go along with that or consider it fair. I don't like Medicaid either, so you can always say, "You libertarians also hate Medicaid!" but I think in the interest of intellectual honesty we should be precise in this discussion. Obamacare is not about providing health care for the poor, because that's what Medicaid is about. Obamacare included a provision expanding Medicaid, but if that was ALL the bill was, it wouldn't be called Obamacare and it wouldn't be seen as transformative. It would just be a qualifications tweak for an existing program, like the SNAP expansion was.

      1. #   12 years ago

        It would be nice if all these lefties could point to all these alleged people dying in the streets, wouldn't it?

        1. #   12 years ago

          The other thing that is quite remarkable too are all the studies that show on average having medicaid does nothing for your health levels relative to not having insurance. Because in either case you still get emergency care, but neither does anything for your general health on average.

    4. Rufus J. Firefly   12 years ago

      Jesus Christ nando you're one vapid individual.

      FYI: I'm Canadian. Not all of us are enamored with public health.

  33. Jon Lester   12 years ago

    Still going at 5:07.

  34. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

    Whoever is screwing up reasonable with their email linked name, fuck off.

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

      Replying to get that username with an email address link out of reasonable.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   12 years ago

        Again

  35. eyeroller   12 years ago

    Holy crap! Cruz just said we need to end farm subsidies!

    Ha ha ha, just kidding.

  36. Rich   12 years ago

    He just mentioned "briar patch". What a RACIST!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!