Jacob Sullum in Forbes on the Need To End Mandatory Minimum Sentences


Writing at Forbes, Reason Senior Editor Jacob Sullum takes a keen look at the injustice of mandatory minimum sentences, and at positive signs that lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), may be ready for reform.
Toward the end of a hearing at which the Senate Judiciary Committee heard about the jaw-dropping injustices caused by mandatory minimum sentences, John Cornyn sounded a note of caution. "We have to be careful not to legislate by anecdote," said the Republican senator from Texas.
Why start now? Congress spends much of its time legislating by anecdote, whether it's a story about a teenager who killed himself after consuming ersatz marijuana, a college student driven to bank robbery by online poker, or a mass murderer who supposedly used a "military-style assault rifle." Here is one issue where anecdotes are perfectly appropriate, since it is impossible to assess the merits of a sentencing system without examining actual cases. If the law allows, let alone requires, grossly disprortionate penalties, it's a problem that needs to be corrected.
Read the full column here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"We have to be careful not to legislate by anecdote," said the Republican senator from Texas.
Yes, Congress must remain as insulated as possible from the effects of the laws they pass.
The naming of laws and procedures ("Amber Alert", "Jessica's Law", "TIMMEH'S Statute - TIMMEH!") after anecdotes demonstrates how state and national lawmakers are careful not to let hard cases become bad laws.
For teh chilrunz...
Also - WAY TO BE SOFT ON CRIME, SULLUM!
We'll pile the dead bodies resulting from your cavalier attitude at your doorstep.
/obligatory
I don't disagree with this piece, but it's important to know why mandatory minimums were created in the first place. In the '70s crime was a big issue, and different judges often handed down wildly different sentences for equivalent cases. Of course this went too far, with the minimums set too high.