Joining Federalism Surge, Missouri Prepares To Tell Feds To Stuff Their Gun Laws


If you want an indicator as to the growing policy divide between the federal government and the residents of many of the states of the union, a good place to look is the growth in state-level laws that overtly defy federal legislation. Constitutional questions remain about states' authority to go their own way on issues including marijuana and guns, and that's likely to be even more true now that Missouri lawmakers prepare to override Gov. Jay Nixon's veto of a bill that would nullify federal firearms restrictions and toss anybody attempting to enforce them into jail. Even so, it's increasingly clear that much of the American population feels quite differently about many issues than do federal officials.
From the New York Times:
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Unless a handful of wavering Democrats change their minds, the Republican-controlled Missouri legislature is expected to enact a statute next month nullifying all federal gun laws in the state and making it a crime for federal agents to enforce them here. A Missourian arrested under federal firearm statutes would even be able to sue the arresting officer.
The law amounts to the most far-reaching states' rights endeavor in the country, the far edge of a growing movement known as "nullification" in which a state defies federal power.
The Missouri Republican Party thinks linking guns to nullification works well, said Matt Wills, the party's director of communications, thanks in part to the push by President Obama for tougher gun laws. "It's probably one of the best states' rights issues that the country's got going right now," he said.
There's no doubt that much of the state-level defiance of federal law is constitutionally iffy — at least with regard to how the Constitution is currently interpreted. Arresting federal law enforcement officers is probably a bit too anti-imperial to fly in 2013. But legislators climb out on constitutional limbs for locally popular causes, and public opinion can nudge federal policy, eventually. Just today, the U.S. Department of Justice announced it won't directly challenge state legalization of medical and recreational marijuana sale and use. That's at least a symbolic backdown, though evidence of a real change will be found, or not, in actual practice.
Missouri's stand against gun restrictions is unlikely to win similar concessions from an administration that just bypassed Congress to unilaterally tighten firearms regulations. Then again, the first medical marijuana law was passed by California voters in 1996, 17 years before today's memo. It takes a long time to get the federal government's attention, so maybe Missouri's nullification efforts will bear similar fruit sometime around 2030.
Follow this story and more at Reason 24/7.
Spice up your blog or Website with Reason 24/7 news and Reason articles. You can get the widgets here. If you have a story that would be of interest to Reason's readers please let us know by emailing the 24/7 crew at 24_7@reason.com, or tweet us stories at @reason247.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This passes and I see much stricter enforcement by federal agents of gun restrictions in Missourah, just to get the precedent out there and set an example.
I can't see Missouri arresting any federal agents considering that Federal gun busts are often related to investigations into drugs and organized crime. They don't normally bust the guy who just happens to have a banned weapon in his garage.
But it would be fucking awesome if they did.
It would be awesome if federal agents routinely arrested a guy simply for possessing a federally banned weapon?
No, the other part, about arresting the federal agents.
Too late. I now consider you a statist.
Or a stadist--a sadist who loves imposing the state on others.
Sounds a bit redundant.
Repestatist.
You can pry my monocle from the cold dead hands of my child laborer.
That would be beautiful. It will never happen, but it would be beautiful.
On the other hand, perhaps life on Bull Shoals Lake could well be in my future, just based on attitude.
You can say that again!
On the other hand, perhaps life on Bull Shoals Lake could well be in my future, just based on attitude.
Right on!
On the other hand, perhaps life on Bull Shoals Lake could well be in my future, just based on attitude.
Alright goddammit I heard you the first two times!
Touchy bitchman.
3:00 PM strikes again!
No doubt President Christie will send in troops.
The more you tighten your grip, Obama, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
Please, please let this pass. Every "fuck you" to the feds is progress.
This is simplistic. Sometimes the federal position is preferable, from a liberty standpoint, to any given state position. For example, Missouri's drug laws are tougher than federal drug law.
http://norml.org/laws
Additionally, in many areas we would not want the state to say 'f*ck you' to the feds when they interfere in state matters. For example, when federal courts strike down state and local gun restrictions as they did in Illinois.
Tiresome pedant is tiresome.
Obama is pushing more executive rule changes on firearms today.
Just as I am waiting for my lunch break to go and mail in a Form 4 and my trust to the BATF.
Apparently spending thousands of dollars and waiting 12 months for BATF approval is a loophole that needs to be closed to save the children.
What a shitbag.
MOST PRO-2nd-AMENDMENT PRESIDENT EVAR!!1
/Shreeeek
I think he stopped reading after the third word "A well regulated... zzzzzzzzz"
Evil libertarianish dude wants to murder the post office.
You think we could get enough states to support a repeal of the XVII?
Im willing to give up Rand as my senator to achieve that goal.
XVI too, please.
Not the Exveeayeaye!
I like Obama's new bold gun controls: Close the loophole where a gun registered to a corporation or a trust doesn't get a background check. Finally, someone is enacting common-sense, reasonable regulation to shut down the scourge of trust and corporate-registered firearms being used in crimes.
The streets will run red with the blood of innocent children if both a man and his wife can legally have access to the same suppressor.
I hope they all cast their "aye" votes while wearing Obama masks.