Feds Consider Looser Rules for "Safe" Mortgages
Qualifying loans could be sold to investors
It's no secret that mortgage underwriting has tightened considerably since the housing bust, helping to reduce defaults.
But how tight standards should be in the future — and especially the role down payments play in judging the risk that loans will go sour — has sent a debate coursing through the mortgage and housing industries and the highest levels of the business community.
Federal regulators Wednesday backed off a March 2011 proposal that included a 20% down payment in the definition of what a low-risk loan should look like when mortgages are packaged as securities and sold to investors. They hope to set a final rule soon after a 60-day comment period.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A reverse mortgage is a mortgage for seniors that permits them to access some of the equity in their home to receive either a lump sum payment or periodic payments. Marketing for these mortgages is increasingly common on television, and a reverse mortgage can help financially strapped seniors. These mortgages also, however, have some significant pitfalls.
Reverse Mortgage Loan
Reverse Mortgage Pros and Cons