Syria

UK To Introduce Syria Resolution at UN Security Council

|

Credit: Patrick Gruban/wikimedia

The U.K. will propose a resolution at the United Nations Security Council today that would authorize actions to protect civilians in Syria from chemical weapons, although Prime Minister David Cameron has not elaborated on what such actions might include.

From the Los Angeles Times:

LONDON – Britain said it would propose a resolution at the United Nations on Wednesday authorizing action to protect civilians in Syria from chemical weapons.

Prime Minister David Cameron did not specify what that action would be or whether the resolution would explicitly lay out military intervention. But the British leader was scheduled to meet with his national security advisors Wednesday to discuss military options that could include airstrikes on Syrian defense assets.

"We've always said we want the U.N. Security Council to live up to its responsibilities on Syria," Cameron said. "Today they have an opportunity to do that."

He said that the resolution would condemn the regime of Syrian president Bashar Assad for using chemical weapons and authorize "necessary measures for protecting civilians."

Parliament is being recalled from its summer recess tomorrow in order to debate the U.K.'s response to the suspected chemical attack near Damascus last week.

Of course, with Russia, one of the Assad regime's strongest allies, and China as a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council there is a good chance that the resolution will not be passed. Both have vetoed Security Council resolutions relating to Syria before. According to Cameron's office, Russian President Vladimir Putin called Cameron yesterday and told him that there was no evidence that the Assad regime had used chemical weapons.

The Los Angeles Times reports that the U.N.'s special envoy to Syria, who thinks it is likely that a "chemical substance" was used in the massacre last week, has said that international law requires the U.N. to approve military intervention.

Although the U.K. will propose the resolution to authorize actions to protect civilians in Syria from chemical weapons, it was British Foreign Secretary William Hague who said that intervention in Syria could take place without a U.N. mandate.

NEXT: 17-Year-Old Victoria Duval Defeats 2011 Champion at US Open

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The only thing Orwell got wrong in 1984 was assuming that Airstrip One and the seat of government in Oceania would be in Britain.

    1. Airstrip One

      Michelle Obama’s pubic region?

    2. I’d assumed that Airstrip One was not the center of power in Oceania, but just another Oceanic city. Wouldn’t most of Europe be in Eurasia? I’d imagine that the Oceanic government would try to make every major population center feel like a “seat of government”. So if you went to New York, or Chicago, or any other major city all of the major ministries would be represented, etc.

  2. UN authorization? Are you fuckers trying to kill our warboners!

    /murika!

  3. Prime Minister David Cameron did not specify what that action would be or whether the resolution would explicitly lay out military intervention.

    I would assume those details will have to be in the actual resolution. Or does the United Nations have a habit of blind approvals?

  4. It is a civil war. The best thing Americans can do to help is donate to charities to help the displaced citizens.

  5. “””authorize actions to protect civilians in Syria “””

    Isn’t this what they did in Libya and instead of protecting civilians they used it as a authorization to be the rebels air force.

  6. Russian President Vladimir Putin called Cameron yesterday and told him that there was no evidence that the Assad regime had used chemical weapons.

    I know there has been speculation that one of the factions that makes up the Syrian resistance are the ones who actually carried out the gas attack, and wanted to make it look like it was Assad. Considering some of the lovely characters that make up the resistance, isn’t it at least possible this is what happened?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.