Crafter of UK Terrorism Act Says it Was Misused on Miranda
Only supposed to be used on actual potential terrorists
In the US, we've had one of the key authors of the Patriot Act, Jim Sensenbrenner, speak out strongly, saying that the NSA interpretation of the law appears to be completely different than what was meant when the bill was written. It looks like something similar may be happening in the UK. Charles Falconer, who helped craft the UK's Terrorism Act, which was used to detain David Miranda and swipe all of his electronics, has now spoken out, saying that it was an illegal use of the Act he wrote.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Government abuses power.
News at eleven.
I'm SHOCKED!! Shocked!!
Oh, boy! Heads are gonna roll now!
Hahaha! Just kidding. Law written for government don't come with any penalties. Pretty slick, huh?
Golden Rule of Politics:
When you give government the power to do unto others, it will use that power to do unto you.
maybe the douche should have never wrote it -_-