Michigan Anti-Begging Law Ruled Unconstitutional
Violation of the First Amendment
A federal appeals court on Wednesday, Aug. 14, affirmed that a state law criminalizing peaceful panhandling is unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker in Grand Rapids earlier ruled that the law violated the First Amendment.
"This decision reaffirms the principle that our Constitution applies equally to everyone, whether poor or rich," said Miriam Aukerman, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney.
"Jail time is a harsh price to pay for holding up a sign or simply asking for spare change."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?