Feds Crack Hard Drives of Child Porn Suspect Who Refused to Give Password
Had become a Fifth Amendment showdown
Federal authorities have cracked two encrypted drives they say are filled with child pornography in a case showing the limits of encryption and highlighting a novel legal issue in which the government has been trying to force the defendant to decrypt the drives to aid his prosecution.
The defendant, Jeffrey Feldman, was arrested in Wisconsin on accusations of three counts of receiving and possessing child pornography.
Tuesday's arrest came months after the authorities told a federal judge that they were unable to decrypt the drives and needed the defendant to disclose his passwords — a proposition that set the stage for a showdown over the constitutional right against compelled self incrimination versus the government's need to access data. In June, the authorities also urged the court to demand Feldman to fork over his passcodes, saying the suspect could "forget his passwords."
An FBI agent said in court documents Tuesday there were seven more drives needing decryption, and for the moment it's unclear whether the judge presiding over the case will order Feldman to decrypt them.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
the fact that the judge is even considering this should be grounds for removal and revoking their law degree.
So, they lied under oath when they said they couldn’t decrypt the drives?
-jcr