Rep. McCaul Rejects Obama's Plan To Add Privacy Advocate to FISA Court
Thinks concern about civil liberties could delay waging war on terror
WASHINGTON, Aug. 12 (UPI) -- A White House idea to add a privacy advocate in the secret court overseeing National Security Agency phone-data logging is a mistake, key U.S. Republicans said.
"I don't think that's the right way to go," House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told NBC's "Meet the Press."
He was responding to President Obama's suggestion in a news conference Friday U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court procedures could be changed "to make sure civil-liberties concerns have an independent voice in appropriate cases by ensuring that the government's position is challenged by an adversary."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'A White House idea to add a privacy advocate in the secret court overseeing National Security Agency phone-data logging is a WORTHLESS DISTRACTION...'
Fixed.