Connecting the Dots of Corruption

A thread runs through Virginia's scandal-plagued governor, the men who would succeed him, the fall of Detroit and the president's economic speech on Wednesday.


History is a tapestry. If you look closely enough, you can see the threads running through seemingly unrelated events. One of them ties together Virginia's scandal-plagued governor, the two men who would succeed him, the decline and fall of Detroit and the president's economic speech on Wednesday.

Last week Gov. Bob McDonnell repaid "loans" made by Jonnie Williams Sr., the CEO of dietary supplement maker Star Scientific. Those loans are just part of the munificence Williams has showered on the McDonnell clan, along with a Rolex watch, a $13,000 Oscar de la Renta jacket and more.

Many have wondered why McDonnell, otherwise a paragon of rectitude, would take such swag. But nobody has asked why Williams would give it — because the answer is obvious. Star Scientific has not made a profit in a decade. But it might, if the governor were to place the weight of the state on the economic scales.

As the Mercatus Center's Matthew Mitchell noted in an insightful op/ed column, Virginia's governor has a lot of quo to give whether or not he takes a fistful of quid. The Governor's Opportunity Fund — just one of numerous economic-incentive programs operated by the state — is something like a slush fund the governor can use to "secure a business location or expansion project." Star Scientific never got any of that money, but it did get free promotion at theExecutive Mansion and by Virginia's first lady, Maureen McDonnell.

Now suppose Virginia politicians swore an oath never to intervene in the marketplace. Suppose they behaved as though there were a great wall of separation, like that between church and state, separating state and economics. In that case, what reason would anyone have to lavish such largesse upon state politicians? Precious little beyond the bonds of personal affection. And it seems reasonable to surmise affection alone would not add up to anywhere near the princely sums that have moved from Williams' hands to McDonnell's. The political allocation of economic goods creates a powerful incentive for private interests to allocate economic goods to politicians.

Williams also has given — though considerably less — to Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, who is running to succeed McDonnell. Cuccinelli's principal opponent, Democratic trencherman Terry McAuliffe, has hounded Cuccinelli for that. But McAuliffe has his own albatross: the eco-car company GreenTech Automotive.

McAuliffe also has hammered Cuccinelli for his strident social views, and warned that Cuccinelli's rigid dogmatism on abortion and homosexuality would chase business away from the commonwealth. Yet back when he was still with the company, McAuliffe infamously chose to put GreenTech's operations in Mississippi — rather than the more socially tolerant Virginia — because Mississippi offered GreenTech a more generous package of economic incentives.

McAuliffe is friends with Mississippi's Republican former governor, Haley Barbour. "I have to go where, obviously, they're going to put incentives," McAuliffe said. Obviously? Without the lure of incentives, perhaps McAuliffe could have paid more attention to the commands of his conscience.

The smoldering GreenTech story flared again last week when news broke that federal authorities are investigating one of the company's sources of funding. President Obama has nominated Alex Mayorkas, currently director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency, to the No. 2 spot in the Department of Homeland Security. There are questions as to whether Mayorkas inappropriately helped Gulf Coast Funds Management obtain an EB-5 visa for a Chinese executive. (The EB-5 program offers green cards in exchange for foreign investment in the U.S.)

GreenTech has relied on Gulf Coast, which is headed by Anthony Rodham, for help in securing foreign investment. Rodham is the brother of Hillary Clinton. McAuliffe is a close friend of theClintons.

Virginia officials were leery of GreenTech's potential involvement with EB-5 financing, and one went so far as to raise national security concerns. But you don't have to go that far to find the whole affair noxiously incestuous. It also is emblematic of how McAuliffe always has operated — mingling business and politics. (In 2010 he even wrote to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano regarding "GreenTech Automotive and EB-5: USCIS Should Help, Not Hurt, Job Creation for U.S. Workers.")

Would that all suddenly change if he were elected governor — or would he, like McDonnell, be seduced by those who would like him to ladle out the sort of incentives GreenTech took advantage of? How could a Governor McAuliffe, having chosen to locate GreenTech on the basis of incentives, ever argue that a prospective company ever ought to site a plant in Virginia simply because it has a good business climate and a fairly level playing field?

Five days before the GreenTech story flared up again, Detroit filed for bankruptcy protection. Numerous factors contributed to the fall of Motor City. One of them, as several commentators noted last week, is statist intervention. Writing on the legal blog The VolokhConspiracy, Ilya Somin noted that "for many years Detroitaggressively used eminent domain to promote 'economic development' and 'urban renewal.'" The principal winners were "politically influential private interests." The principal losers were poor, often minority, communities:

"The most notorious example was the 1981 Poletown case, in which some 4,000 people lost their homes, and numerous businesses were forced to move in order to make way for a General Motors factory. . . . [T]hePoletown takings — like many other similar condemnations — ended up destroying far more development than they ever created. In his prescient dissent in Poletown, Michigan Supreme Court Justice James Ryan warned that there was no real reason to expect that the project would produce the growth promised by GM and noted that Detroit and the court had 'subordinated a constitutional right to private corporate interests.'"

Urban renewal contributed to Detroit's decline in other ways as well. In a follow-up post Somin cites economist David Henderson, who noted that one of the few poor black neighborhoods that managed to avoid the infamous rioting that took place in 1967 was also one of the few that dodged the bullet of renewal through eminent domain. Hence, the close-knit community remained close-knit.

The premise behind the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes — a rationale legitimized by the Supreme Court in the infamous Kelo case — is fairly straightforward. Government officials have superior wisdom, and given sufficient power over other people they can produce economic outcomes superior to those that result from free choices by economic participants. The vacant streets of Detroitand the empty wasteland where Suzette Kelo's neighborhood inConnecticut once stood expose the fallacy of that premise.

On Wednesday, President Obama ignored those object lessons and reiterated his call for more, always more, political allocation of economic goods. The job of creating a solid middle class, he argued, belongs to government, which can do so through "new rules." And "long-term strategies." And "new initiatives." And "executive authority," which is his favorite kind. And a "new push to rebuild run-down neighborhoods" (look out, Detroit). And "plans that I willlay out" — because nothing makes an economy hum like central planning.

Nothing invites the vulpine corruption of civic virtue by monied interests like central planning, either. Just ask Virginia's political class for proof of that.

This article originally appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

NEXT: Concord, NH, Cops Want Armored SWAT Vehicle to Combat "Free Staters" (And Others)

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. my buddy’s mom makes $84 an hour on the computer. She has been without work for seven months but last month her payment was $19610 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this web site…………WEP6.COM

  2. One of them, as several commentators noted last week, is statist intervention.

    Uh, I’m pretty sure that’s *the* reason Detroit failed.

    If you don’t give the state power, it cannot make itself an obstacle.

    1. just before I looked at the receipt that said $6077, I accept that…my… friends brother was like really making money part time from there pretty old laptop.. there mums best friend haz done this 4 only thirteen months and resantly cleard the dept on their condo and purchased a brand new Lancia Straton. I went here,

  3. Shorter Hinkle:

    Power and money will always find each other.

    1. Sadly, most consider that a feature and not a bug.

    2. And since we can and should do nothing to reduce prosperity, the obvious solution is to reduce the power exercised by the government.
      Hey, I think I’ve found something!

      1. Only problem is you think we shouldn’t do anything to reduce prosperity. The government disagrees.

        1. There you go thinking prosperity is measured in economic terms. The reality is that all of our souls need saving from greed, corporations, families, and religion. Gaia and Obama are the only true gods.

  4. I’ve always argued to people who say we need laws and rules to get corporate money out of politics, that if the federal government was really bound by article 1 sec 8, there would be no reason to worry about corporate money in politics.

    1. Statists always think of new additions to the mazes for the hoi polloi, with lots of secret doors and passageways for the elites. Last thing they’d want is to eliminate the artificial attraction at the end of the maze — no one would enter the maze and need to pay to enter the secret doors.

  5. The intervention of the state into economics cannot be anything but arbitrary, and therefore corruptive. Are to to blame the businessman for the arbitrary power of the state (qua economics) that is exercised against him, or do we blame the bureaucrat for dishonoring his premise of “public servant”?

    Neither; both are pointless derailments of the crucial matter at hand: the involvement of the government in economics. Advocate SEPARATION OF ECONOMICS AND STATE with the bold confidence of knowing that you have reality on your side.

  6. up to I looked at the receipt which said $7068, I be certain that…my… father in law woz like realie receiving money in their spare time at there labtop.. there friends cousin has done this for only about seventeen months and just took care of the debts on their apartment and purchased themselves a Lotus Esprit. this is where I went,www.Rush60.??m

  7. Robert Jarvis, libertarian candidate for Governor!

  8. **Robert SARVIS for VA Governor!

  9. Now that I know former Miss. Governor Haley Barbour and Terry McAuliffe are good buddies, I’ve learned “good ole’ boyism” crosses party lines.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.