Study Suggests That Over a Decade After 9/11 Al Qaeda is Growing and Shifting Focus


According to a recent study written by Seth Jones of the RAND Corporation Al Qaeda is growing and remains a threat to the U.S. However, the study also suggests that Al Qaeda and its allies are becoming increasingly decentralized and more interested in establishing strongholds in areas such as North Africa while most members are not actively plotting to carry out terrorist attacks in the U.S.
Over a decade since the launch of the War on Terror it seems that not only is Al Qaeda still around, it is growing. While it might be reassuring to American policy makers that Al Qaeda and its allies are not as keen on planning terrorist attacks on U.S. soil as they once were they will not be reassured to hear that a growing Al Qaeda is seeking to undermine particular unstable regions.
From the RAND Corporation study:
What are al Qa'ida's objectives? The answer depends, in part, on which al Qa'ida figure one is referencing. Al Qa'ida leaders in various parts of the world – Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (also known as Abu Du'a) in Iraq, Abdelmalek Droukdal in North Africa, Ahmed Abdi aw-Mohammed in Somalia, Nasir al-Wahishi in Yemen, and Abu Muhammad al-Jawlani in Syria – tend to have parochial goals. They want to establish Islamic emirates in specific countries or regions, though they may be agnostic about a broader violent jihad. For al Qa'ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) leader Abdelmalek Droukdal, for example, the goal is to overthrow regimes in North Africa, especially Algeria, and replace them with an Islamic regime. And France, rather than the United States, is the most significant foreign enemy.
In Mali, the French-led intervention has put plans to establish an Islamic emirate on hold, while in Syria it remains to be seen what influence Al Qaeda-linked groups will have after the civil war.
Although findings like those highlighted in the RAND Corporation study should be reassuring to Americans (Al Qaeda may be growing but its focus is shifting) the fact is that the Obama administration will soon be sending weapons to at least one of Al Qaeda's latest theatres of operation, despite there being no immediate American interests at stake.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In Mali, the French-led intervention has put plans to establish an Islamic emirate on hold
B-b-but blowback!
And how many times has Reason told us that AQ was a defeated husk and totally not a threat anymore? It has to be one or the other.
Yep... Krayewski and Feeney, they'll write anything if it makes for some good libertarian propaganda.
Fact averse they can most definitely be.
Good point.
Re-elect me! AQ is on the run!
Give me more power! AQ is growing and spreading and wants to kill your babies!
Only libertarians who don't give a shit about liberty would pretend that al Qaeda ain't their problem.
What are the odds of the show homeland relocating to N Africa for future seasons?
Dude that makes a ll kinds of sense man. WOw.
http://www.Global-Anon.com
I think the best thing might be to declare that we have made our post-9/11 point and stop with the droning for now. Lighten up on the TSA/NSA stuff, too. Then, when there's another terror attack: BLAMMO!