US Hopeful About Post-2014 Deal on Afghanistan, Parliament Votes to Sack Interior Minister Over Deteriorating Security
Troops and money to remain in Afghanistan


President Obama has outlined a plan for Afghanistan that entails US involvement past the "withdrawal" date of 2014; US troops would stay to conduct counterterrorism missions and to help train Afghan security forces, things they've been doing pretty much since the start of the war in 2001. Congressman Walter Jones told Reason last year that "you can train a monkey to ride a bicycle in less time" than its taken the US to train Afghan security forces.
Now, Afghanistan's parliament voted to remove the interior minister, who is in charge of security forces, blaming him for the security forces' poor showing against the Taliban and accusing him of corruption. Hamid Karzai, whose presidential term expires next year, referred the matter to the Supreme Court. Karzai did his part earlier this year to scuttle US peace talks with the Taliban, while Pakistan sent an envoy to help open new peace talks with the Taliban, which it denies having control over.
Earlier this month, the Obama Administration floated the idea of a complete withdrawal by 2014 because of Afghanistan's unwillingness to negotiate the terms under which US troops would operate after that. Today, the chairman of the joints chief of staff downplayed that possibility, after Karzai reportedly agreed in principle on a post-2014 deal, which would also presumably secure the continuation of US money spent on the Afghan government. One country's wasteful spending is another country's fuel for corruption.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The stimulus must be bigger! Not having a war is impoverishing!
RACIST
Should he have said ciscycle?
Speaking of trained monkeys, has Carney ever told us what the US mission in Afghanistan actually is?
WTF are we doing there?
Something about getting the tallyman to tally our bananas I think.
That explains why me won go home.
Are we leaving Afghanistan before or after we close the prison at Guantanamo? I just want to be clear on the timeframe for all of these promises.
It's going to be right after your health insurance costs go down.
President Obama has outlined a plan for Afghanistan
Next, he plans to color in that outline with crayons. Then he intends to tape it to his refrigerator next to his Peace Prize and "most transparent administration evah" award.
Plan for A-Stan, ay? you dont say. dont rush things though, buddy. its not like yove had enough time to dwell on the various issues. Maybe you should just keep sending soldiers to die for some shithole country and try and keep as mum about it as possible, and just pass the ball to the next president. dont stick your neck out or anything.
RETHUDLGICAN OBSTRUCTIONIZM
I thought it say post-2014 "defeat"...
oh well.