Fidelity to the rule of law is the centerpiece of a free society. It means that no one is beneath the protection of the law and no one is absolved of the obligation to comply with it. The government may not make a person or a class of persons exempt from constitutional protections, as it did during slavery, nor may it make government officials exempt from complying with the law, as it does today. In the modern era, writes Judge Andrew Napolitano, presidents have rejected the value of the rule of law and instead followed their own political interests.
Thank you for supporting us during our webathon!
Reason is supported by:
A Professor Tried To End a Flirty Email Exchange With a Young Woman. Then She Threatened to Blackmail Him.
When the grad student threatened to publicize their embarrassing correspondence, he reported her. But the university decided he was the villain.
The Inspector General Report Is a Huge Blow to the FBI's Credibility. Why Is It Being Treated Like Vindication?
The government's surveillance of Carter Page might not have been improperly motivated, but it was still seriously flawed.
Teen activists are righteously angry—but righteous anger does not produce sound public policy.
No, but that's not stopping a litigious vegan from making his case.