Civil War

No Gods, No Generals, Just People

A Civil War drama debuts.


I done two tours of duty in Vietnam/And I came home with a brand new plan

This weekend sees the debut of Copperhead, a movie set in upstate New York during the Civil War. It was directed by Ron Maxwell, who has several Civil War movies to his credit, and it was scripted by Bill Kauffman, a former Reason staffer who still occasionally contributes to the magazine.

Kauffman is also a longtime friend, so I can't claim to be an unbiased observer here, but I like the movie. It's very different from Maxwell's last Civil War picture, Gods & Generals, which didn't impress me as much: I thought the battle scenes in that one were filmed with flair, but things tended to get stiff and heavy-handed when the characters spoke instead of shot at each other. The new film, by contrast, shows no battles at all but has plenty of believable human-scale interaction. The parts the L.A. Times reviewer dismissed as "a rambling, drawn-out set up" were the parts I liked best: comfortable (and, later, not-so-comfortable) sequences that give texture to the town and its citizens. And despite the absence of battle scenes, it's unmistakably a war movie, in the same way that The Deer Hunter is a war movie even when it's showing you Pennsylvania instead of Vietnam.

Kauffman has posted a long and interesting article about his film's aims and origins at Front Porch Republic. Here's an extract from that essay, discussing the Harold Frederic novella that was the basis for the picture:

Hell raiser.

In every incarnation it sold poorly, as Frederic's work usually did. But then The Copperhead hit none of the expected notes. It catered neither to "Battle Hymn of the Republic" Northern righteousness nor "Dixie" Southern romanticism….There is an unblinking, unsentimental honesty to The Copperhead and Frederic's other stories of the War. The fanfare and spangles, the soaring rhetoric and battlefield heroism: you'll find none of that on his York State homefronts. We are shown, instead, a little world pockmarked, drained of life, even, by what—and who—is absent. Young men leave communities of which they are essential pieces. Some return intact but irreparably altered; some stagger home shattered; others make the trip back in pine boxes. The normal rhythms of courtship are disrupted. The interdependence of small farms, crossroads shops, and little Protestant churches is unraveled, and we are given to understand that things will never be the same.

And here's another section worth highlighting:


Typically, in a story of a dissenter, the author flatters himself and the audience. The deck is stacked; the cards are marked. Every right-thinking reader or viewer is confident that of course he or she would be at the side of this poor recusant who is being persecuted by narrow-minded peasants or clerics who deny that the earth orbits the sun or that man is a product of evolution or that the world is older than six thousand years or that the simon-pure prisoner who is about to be lynched is innocent. But really: is any pose more cheaply purchased than standing—at a very safe distance of years—with Galileo or Scopes?

Smugness is detestable. Only a complacent idiot enjoys burning strawmen or crowing over his moral superiority to the benighted. Harold Frederic does not let the reader bask in his own sanctimony. It's so easy to say that you're for free speech; that you honor the First Amendment; that though you may not agree with so and so who says such and such, you'll defend to the death his right to say it. Well, here's Abner Beech, an Upstate New York farmer of 1862. He thinks this war between the states—this hallowed war, this bloodletting out of which modern America was born—is an unconstitutional atrocity. He despises the soon-to-be martyred Abraham Lincoln, who by most 21st-century lights is the greatest American hero. Abner stands up and speaks his piece—his peace–during time of war.

Okay, Mr. Free Speech. Are you willing to defy the mob and defend Abner?

It's not so easy.

You can read the rest here, and you can see where the movie is playing here.

NEXT: Joe Biden Talks Edward Snowden Asylum with Ecuador

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Sometimes dude you jsut have to roll with it.

  2. It looks like you can also watch it on Amazon Instant Video.

    1. Also on Comcast on demand. Sorry, “Xfinity” on demand.

  3. Cool! Mike Church has talked to Mr. Maxwell on his radio show on the Sirius. Sounds VERY interesting.

    I actually quite enjoyed “Gods and Generals”. Definitely looking forward to seeing “Copperhead”.

    1. his radio show on the Sirius

      Is that like watching “stories” on “the television set”?

  4. Smugness is detestable. Only a complacent idiot enjoys burning strawmen or crowing over his moral superiority to the benighted. Harold Frederic does not let the reader bask in his own sanctimony.

    Sounds like a good movie.

  5. I saw it when it opened. Not very well-attended, but there were a few people in the audience. There *were* some set-piece speeches, but they were integrated into the plot. The producers were trying not to be anachronistic, except for the part where they were watching the battle of Antietam on their iPhones (just kidding).

  6. Hopefully Google can take some time out of their busy schedule uglifying their Android apps while ignoring their own UI guidelines (where are my Holo Dark native options, rarrrgh) to reverse their Reader cancellation decision today.

  7. On a related note about copperheads: The Harrisburg PA paper begain as a copperhead organ (it’s now typically reflexively liberal). With Civil War 150, they’re running stories from 150 years ago. Go here:…..rt_m-rpt-1

    It’s really cool to see the antipathy for Lincoln and abolitionists the paper had, as well as its very colorful tweaking of the city’s Republican paper. Start with some of the earlier articles if you’re interested. They really, really hated Lincoln.

    1. The Patriot Snooze? No shit? I grew up reading that rag. I still have the Apollo 11 Moon landing front section in a box somewhere.

      1. Old media rot has affected them. They’re down to publishing 3 days a week now.

        1. Not too surprising; if not for the capital, it would probably gone under by now.

          I’m not sure how I forgot about this, but I used to deliver it too. Not a bad little salesman, I was. I doubled my subscribers inside of 6 months. That was when they had morning *and* evening editions.

          1. capital = capitol


          2. The Evening News. I delivered that in Lemoyne after school.

            That paper went out of business in the 1990s, I think.

      2. I still have the Apollo 11 Moon landing front section in a box somewhere.

        I have the front/back page of the Louisville Courier-Journal version framed on my wall.

        I was born mid Aug 1969, so it is very slightly older than me.

      3. Gawd! I wish I’d saved that issue, but I was only 7 at the time and didn’t know better.

    2. I like this one because it has an advertisement for CLEAN COAL.….._-_50.html

    1. “… exudes all the excitement of a textbook history lesson.” — Slant Magazine

      Why doesn’t the reviewer just say, “Too much introspection, not enough car chases.”

  8. Only a complacent idiot enjoys burning strawmen or crowing over his moral superiority to the benighted.

    That’s roughly 80% of the population. I might be a bit low.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.