Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Edward Snowden Departs Hong Kong, Hong Kong Asks U.S. for Clarification on Spying, U.S. Worried About Hong Kong's Commitment to the Rule of Law

Reportedly headed to Moscow

Ed Krayewski | 6.23.2013 5:14 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | The Guardian
(The Guardian)
lucky number seven?
The Guardian

Edward Snowden, who leaked information to the press about the NSA's massive telephone and digital spying operations, was charged by the U.S. government on Friday for spying. The U.S. sought to extradite Snowden from Hong Kong and they wanted to do it quickly. A Reuters article that came out about a couple of hours ago quotes an anonymous U.S. official saying that "[i]f Hong Kong doesn't act soon, it will complicate our bilateral relations and raise questions about Hong Kong's commitment to the rule of law."

Hong Kong has now responded to the U.S request for extradition by letting the U.S. know it did not provide sufficient information to warrant preventing Edward Snowden from leaving the island, and that that's what he's done. Additionally, the government of Hong Kong says it has formally asked the U.S. for "clarification on earlier reports about the hacking of computer systems in Hong Kong by US government agencies." You can read the Hong Kong government's press release here.

Reports indicate Snowden is bound for Russia, which previously offered him asylum, at least for now, but according to an Agence France-Presse tweet Russia says it has no knowledge of his impending arrival.

More Reason on Edward Snowden here. More on the previous six people charged by the Obama administration for leaks here.

UPDATE: Wikileaks says via Twitter it's assisted Snowden in gaining asylum to a "democratic country" and that he's over Russian airspace with Wikileaks legal advisors on the plane.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Pelosi Booed By Liberal Activists Over Comments About Edward Snowden

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsEdward SnowdenWorldCivil LibertiesRule of lawNSAHong KongSurveillanceEspionage
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (93)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Acosmist   12 years ago

    A democratic country? So Russia is just a layover.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    ...clarification on earlier reports about the hacking of computer systems in Hong Kong by US government agencies.

    Yeah, right. Hong Kong had a better chance getting that clarification from Snowden while they had him than getting it from the Obama Administration.

    1. mr lizard   12 years ago

      They probably already have said clarification. Just rubbing it in O's face but in a Klassy way

    2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      That's a diplomatic Fuck You response to the US threats and questioning their commitment to the rule of law

      1. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   12 years ago

        The US government is fucking embarrassing itself right now. It's in an episode of Intervention but doesn't realize it. Unfortunately, it is destined to return to the bottle.

        1. Alan   12 years ago

          +1

      2. Alan   12 years ago

        When it comes to a commitment to the Rule of Law, the U.S. needs to remove that beam from their own eye before trying to remove the speck from Hong Kong's.

  3. mr lizard   12 years ago

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha, double fuck you win for anyone who ever got turned away at the DMV because they forgot some stoopid piece of documentation (I'm talking to all the REAL ID compliant states)

    1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

      I don't know how I missed it, but I wasn't even aware of all that crap until I read this article yesterday.

      1. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   12 years ago

        That is fucking retarded on all kinds of levels. I'd even have a hard time finding a piece of mail with my name and address on it. I do everything electronically.

  4. Res Publica Americana   12 years ago

    An American having to seek refuge in an authoritarian ex-commie hole to avoid persecution at the hands of his own government for revealing that that government is engaging in unconstitutional surveillance?

    God forgive us for what we've done to our inheritance.

  5. BlueBook   12 years ago

    This is the part where the guy on the plane turns out to be a decoy, and the real Snowden drifts out of Hong Kong in a run-down sampan.

    1. Enjoy Every Sandwich   12 years ago

      LOL I was thinking exactly the same thing. It would be doubly funny if the U.S. government did something radical like force the plane down while it's over friendly airspace, and then someone gets a pic of the U.S. officials' faces when they realize they've been snookered.

  6. Fluffy   12 years ago

    If you had told me when I was 18 that in 25 years there'd be a guy who committed espionage against the US flying from China to Moscow, and that I'd be rooting for him to make it and get away clean, I would have told you that you were fucking crazy.

    That's kind of a problem.

    1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      And the sad part is that 50+% of the comments on CNN favor the government's position.

      Blind allegiance to an oppressive regime.

      We are FUCKED!

      1. Rrabbit   12 years ago

        The sheep have not learned yet that all that spying on US citizen can and will at some point be used against them.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          Most won't learn until it's too late.

      2. Ted S.   12 years ago

        A good portion of it is TEAM!!!!!!!!!! bullshit.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          How would they know what to think if their TEAM didn't tell them?

          While our state of affairs is disappointing, it isn't unexpected. Sheeple will sheep.

      3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

        And the sad part is that 50+% of the comments on CNN favor the government's position.

        It's actually a very good sign that it's only 50%.

        1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

          I guess in some sick, twisted way, I'd have to agree with you. Only half the population is clueless. Yay!

          1. thom   12 years ago

            Half of CNN commenters.

            1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

              Point taken, but aren't progressives the "party" of civil rights?

              Seems about 50/50 wherever I look.

              1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

                Point taken, but aren't progressives the "party" of civil rights?

                Nope, they never were.

                From sending anti-war protesters to prison in the 1910s to speech codes in the 90s they've always come down on the side of the state over liberty.

                The bleeding heart liberals who were civil libertarians have been dwindling since the 70s and were replaced by progressives as the dominant wing of the democrat party in the 90s. Today, they're almost complete extinct.

          2. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

            In the run up to the Iraq war, 95%+ of the public thought the government should do anything and everything to keep us safe.

            So 50% is a huge improvement.

            Plus I'd say that people on the right are expressing more outrage than lefties. And that's not just partisanship, because it's the tea party types that hate the R establishment that are pissed about the spying and the republican establishment douchebags that are defending it.

    2. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      Good point - I would have never believed it either. It's too strange for fiction which just goes to prove the old saw.

      Anyway - Run Snowden, Run! And keep fighting the good fight.

    3. Sugarsail   12 years ago

      me too.

  7. PS   12 years ago

    At this point no one seems to know whether he will seek asylum in Russia or head on to Iceland or Ecuador. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

    1. mr lizard   12 years ago

      In Putin's Russia asylum seeks you

      1. PS   12 years ago

        Actually, Snowden just wants to hang out with Depardieu and dance.

    2. Fluffy   12 years ago

      I'm hearing Venezuela.

      I'd rather it were a country I could respect, but unfortunately "our list of allies grows thin."

      1. PS   12 years ago

        Yeah, that would be disappointing.

      2. BlueBook   12 years ago

        Someone on Fox mentioned Cuba. Too bad those free cities in Honduras aren't up and running yet.

      3. Marginal   12 years ago

        Only two countries can effectively tell the US to scram: China and Russia.

        If he's smart, he won't go to any other country; they're all pissants.

        1. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   12 years ago

          Cuba? North Korea?

      4. RBS   12 years ago

        I agree, but at this point he pretty has to go to country that wants to give a big fuck you to our government right?

        1. Marginal   12 years ago

          wants to give a big fuck you to our government right?

          Oh, I think Russia fits that bill

  8. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    The powers in the United States government cannot let this stand. They're no doubt diverting substantial resources and expending diplomatic capital on getting him. I don't think it will take all that long before they have him in custody, and we'll not hear from him again.

    The whole leak investigation has been about saving face, not national security. It's a vendetta and these people have shown they can be quite vindictive to those who try to expose them to sunlight.

    1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      Oooooh, a shiny object.

      /the media

    2. Mike M.   12 years ago

      Yep, and Block Yomomma and the minions who work for him are even more vindictive than your typical governments agents.

  9. Atanarjuat   12 years ago

    Is Snowden collecting funds for his defense like George Zimmerman did? If not he should be.

    1. RBS   12 years ago

      The feds would love a crack at the massive "conspiracy to commit espionage."

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Reason should use George Zimmerman's face, or Jared Loughner's, to illustrate a Snowden article, just to see if anybody catches the difference.

  10. LynchPin1477   12 years ago

    The great thing is that the continuing drama guarantees that this will stay in the headlines. PRISM itself would have gotten buried in the news cycle pretty quickly but this sort of reality TV has endless staying power.

  11. Gordilocks   12 years ago

    More truth about our state of affairs from The Onion.

    http://www.theonion.com/articl...../?ref=auto

    1. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Roll that beautiful bean footage!

    2. mr lizard   12 years ago

      Your future reptilian overlords have heard you calls. We promise to persecute based solely on 20 sided dice rolls.

    3. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      The scary thing about that is it's really not satire.

  12. Andrew S.   12 years ago

    I'll just echo what Balko said on Facebook: As an American, it is really embarrassing that someone who exposed abuses of my privacy and freedom has no choice but to seek protection from countries like China, Cuba, Russia and Venezuela.

    I mean, it's not surprising nowadays. But it is really embarrassing.

  13. Sevo   12 years ago

    "U.S. Worried About Hong Kong's Commitment to the Rule of Law"

    Funny!

    1. Francisco d Anconia   12 years ago

      Drips with irony, don't it?

    2. Jerryskids   12 years ago

      Concern troll is concerned.

  14. Zakalwe   12 years ago

    Taliban kills Russian, Chinese, Ukrainian tourists in Pakistan as retaliation for...US drone strike.

    Gunmen stormed a camp on Pakistan's second largest mountain on Sunday, killing nine foreign climbers in a brazen assault that could deal a blow to the country's efforts to jumpstart its tourism industry.

    Pakistan's Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack, calling it retribution for a suspected U.S. drone strike last month that killed Wali ur-Rehman, the second highest-ranking leader of the terrorist group.

    1. Sevo   12 years ago

      We drone, you die!

    2. mr lizard   12 years ago

      What's the life expectancy of a guy labeled Taliban VP? Or do they just keep re-spawning?

    3. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

      Totally believable.

      While I don't doubt that drone attacks have repercussions, turning the Taliban into foreigner hating bad guys isn't one of them.

  15. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Le Mans is done (Kristenson wins again); I switched over to CNN just in time to hear Schumer blathering about what a rotten traitorous guy Snowden is. Chuck Schumer is more of a traitor to the Constitution than Edward Snowden.

    ps- Candy Crowley is a retard. A fat, ugly, mendacious retard.

    1. Marginal   12 years ago

      Is anyone in America more contemptuous of the Constitution than fucking Chuck Schumer? Maybe Mike Bloomberg.

      I swear, when either one of these fuck-nuts kicks the bucket, we should have a reasonoid Meet-up in the Bronx and toast to a marginally-improved planet.

      ~

      Also, excellent point about Crowley. I have a feeling that she's hoping to get fired and then she can launch a lawsuit against CNN for weight-discrimination.

      Hopefully, that abominable cunt will drown this summer.

      1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

        "Also, excellent point about Crowley. I have a feeling that she's hoping to get fired and then she can launch a lawsuit against CNN for weight-discrimination."

        That's just what is needed to get everyone to stop paying attention to the NSA.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      Le Mans is done (Kristenson wins again);

      Did whichever sports channel had the coverage here in the States get the fatal crash live?

    3. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   12 years ago

      That's exactly what I said about Pete King yesterday.

  16. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

    They want to charge him with espionage for revealing "secrets" to the American people?

    Someone accused him of treason becasue of his loyalty to the American people rather than the government?

    Run, Edward, run!

    I wish it were Barack Obama desperately seeking asylum somewhere.

    1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      They want to charge him with espionage for revealing "secrets" to the American people?

      With The inevitable conclusion that the government thinks the American people are it's enemy.

      1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

        Precisely.

        He betrayed us to the enemy!

  17. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    How entertaining would it be to get a live feed of the phone call between Putin and Obama?

    1. Jerryskids   12 years ago

      I've got a buddy at the NSA that can get you that.

    2. Rich   12 years ago

      Perhaps it would be something like this?

  18. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Now that sleazy lying little cunt Stephanie Cutter is on.

    I believe YOU, Stephanie.

  19. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    "But I'm the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES! You have to do what I say!"

    "Sorry, Sonny, I don't have time to talk to you right now, I have an appointment to get my shoes shined."

    1. Lord Humungus   12 years ago

      shoes shined

      RAACCIIIST!

  20. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Nice. Greenwald just pretty much called out David Gregory to his face for being a puppet of the administration.

    1. Sevo   12 years ago

      Can't happen often enough.

  21. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

    Some a-hole spy general on Stepho's show says that his primary duty is to protect the American people.

    Really? I thought you swore an oath to defend the constitution.

    Fascist fuck.

    1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      Even if his job was to protect the American people, why doesn't telling the American people that their rights are being abused by their own government qualify as "protecting the American people"?

      1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

        "We had to destroy their rights in order to save them."

        1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

          Those of us who were around here during the Bush Administration, we were pounding on the Democrats at the time for offering no opposition when the Bush Administration was stomping all over our rights. I remember pieces here at H&R about how the Democrats may have been loyal--but they sure as hell weren't offering any opposition...

          They sucked in opposition, but it didn't really occur to me at the time that when they got their turn in the White House that they would become full on perpetrators of the same shit--even worse. As awful as the Republicans are on free market capitalism, they do, at least, offer some resistance to the Democrats' socialist impulses.

          But there isn't any reason to vote for the Democrats' anymore--certainly not if you're concerned about civil rights. If the Democrats can't stand up on this one, then there is nothing left of any pretense that they're pretty good on civil rights. Far as I can tell, they're worse than the Republicans on civil rights.

          I'd rather suffer prayer in public schools.

          1. Fatty Bolger   12 years ago

            Progs are always down with domestic spying. After all, information is key to proper management of the local human biomass.

  22. robc   12 years ago

    "He has taken information that does not belong to him ? it belongs to the people of the United States"

    Ummm...and he released the information to the people of the United States.

    If I own this fucking info, I should be able to fucking know about it.

    1. Ken Shultz   12 years ago

      Gets to the heart of it, don't it?

      There are a lot of people out there who can't tel the difference between American people and the government.

      Maybe that's the first step in the twelve-step program to becoming a libertarian.

      Step 1: Admitting that there is a difference between the American people and their government.

      1. Virginian   12 years ago

        "You can't say you love your country and hate your government."-Bill Clinton.

        Sure you can you Arkansas slime mold. Fuck you. -Me

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Amazing that a President would say that in a world where fully half of the world's governments are openly authoritarian or totalitarian, and where the "democratic" countries violated plenty of peoples' rights as well.

          1. Virginian   12 years ago

            I find it more amazing that some libertarians think he was a decent President. The man was just as bad as his successors. I wish he would die a painful death. Maybe someone could lay siege to his house before burning him alive inside it. That would be very appropriate.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              Clinton set the stage for many of the bad trends we're sorting through today, from engaging our military in "humanitarian" invasions and peacekeeping mission, to using the government to eliminate internal dissent. Waco was a travesty, and Albright should be rotting in a cell.

              It's easy to be a "good President" when you're presiding over the first peacetime economy the nation's had in 60 years, you luck into a great economy spurred by factors your administration had nothing to do with, and when you can cut government on account of not having a war to deal with.

              1. Heedless   12 years ago

                NAFTA and Welfare Reform were both pretty important. Not perfect by any means, but definite steps in the right direction.

                That's more than we've managed under any president since.

                1. Virginian   12 years ago

                  He vetoed welfare reform twice. He only supported it after it passed over his objections. He shouldn't get any credit for it.

                  I mean that's like crediting Reagan for the Boland Amendment.

            2. Sevo   12 years ago

              Virginian| 6.23.13 @ 12:36PM |#
              "I find it more amazing that some libertarians think he was a decent President."

              I don't know a lot of libertarians who think he was a decent president, but I know a lot who think he was a fuck-up who ended up being grid-locked to the point where he could do little damage.
              And I for one pine for those days.

    2. Ted S.   12 years ago

      He has taken information that does not belong to him ? it belongs to the people of the United States

      Isn't he one of the people of the United States?

      1. Sevo   12 years ago

        Yes, he needs to be locked up! He stole from himself! And, uh, well,...

  23. robc   12 years ago

    "we agreed that they (the NSA) had over-collected"

    And who went to jail for the overcollection?

    1. VG Zaytsev   12 years ago

      But you can trust them now.

      Despite their lying to Congress and violating their constitutional mandate.

  24. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    "Governance" by vague unsubstantiated assertion.

    "If we cannot act behind a veil of total secrecy, you peasants will all die a horrible horrible death!"

  25. fredtyg   12 years ago

    If you'd like to take a guess at where Ed Snowden finally ends up, I've posted a poll on my blog:
    http://humboldtlib.blogspot.co.....e-run.html

  26. califernian   12 years ago

    " A Reuters article that came out about a couple of hours ago quotes an anonymous U.S. official saying that "[i]f Hong Kong doesn't act soon, it will complicate our bilateral relations and raise questions about Hong Kong's commitment to the rule of law."

    Puh-leeeeeze.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Maryland's New 3 Percent Tax Will Chill the State's Emerging Tech Sector

Tosin Akintola | 7.6.2025 6:30 AM

Conflicts and Contrasts Make Jerusalem Endlessly Fascinating

Jacob Sullum | From the August/September 2025 issue

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!