Privacy Friendly Search Engine DuckDuckGo Sees Surge in Users After NSA Scandal
DuckDuckGo, a relatively small-scale search engine, has seen a sudden surge in activity. Although the site lacks image searches, maps, email services, and other bells and whistles common on sites like Google, DuckDuckGo makes up for its lack of window dressing by offering users something they won't find on a massive search engine: anonymity.
Thanks to the NSA scandal, Americans are once again thinking about privacy. DuckDuckGo recorded a 33% surge in users over the last two weeks, according to a CNBC Closing Bell report. According to an interview with the Independent, the site has also experience 69% growth in direct searches.
Gabriel Weinberg, the founder and CEO of DuckDuckGo, thinks he knows why people are choosing the stripped-down search engine:
"We always knew people didn't want to be tracked, but what hadn't happened was reporting on the private alternatives and so it's no surprise that people are making a choice to switch to things that that will give them great results and also have real privacy,"
DuckDuckGo's uptick follows recent revelations made about the National Security Agency. The government agency was exposed for operating a program called PRISM, which collects vast amounts of meta data on American citizens. One of the most disconcerting aspects of the scandal was that private technology companies, such as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, and Verizon, complied with requests for user information. Weinberg explained why DuckDuckGo never got roped into the government program:
Basically, most tech companies store user information—like searches, email account data, searches on social platforms—in data warehouses, so that it can be accessed again. But DuckDuckGo opts to throw any of that information away and not to save it, Weinberg said.
[…] "We had zero inquiries and the reason for that is because we don't store any data," Weinberg said. "So if they come to us—which they know because it's in our privacy policy—we have nothing to hand over, it's all anonymous data."
Although the company prides itself on privacy, the CEO did suggest his belief that users "are staying because they're getting a better search experience," because "DuckDuckGo gets its results from over one hundred sources," and there is "less clutter, less spam."
Despite the recent surge and Weinstein's vision of a better user experience, DuckDuckGo is still small: "Our next milestone is to hit 1% of the search market share. We are about halfway towards that goal."
Currently, the search engine's duck graphic links to the site "call.stopwatching.us," which offers a petition to "end to the NSA's unconstitutional surveillance programs" as well as a phone number to call legislators and "demand real answers."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Much better Zenon. Much better.
How long till Congress mandates that search engines must store search records?
The DOJ will just interpret an already existing regulation as such and gag the decision.
The next time a CISPA/PIPA law gets logrolled into some spending bill.
Exactly. I guess we just have to hope that such services keep popping up, preferably open source and out of country.
We always knew people didn't want to be tracked, but what hadn't happened was reporting on the private alternatives...
That's called advertising. Buy some.
They did. But it was all internet ads hosted on Google.
It looks like someone besides the NSA is keeping tabs on our online hijinks.
Obviously, we need some politcal slashfic from SugarFree to break in the new guy.
We should get the kid to write an article about which kind of beer goes best with deep dish pizza topped by circumcision cuttings from aborted fetuses.
Pickled schmuck?
Ewwwww.... beer?
Slashfic from SF doesn't break people in...it breaks them period.
If the kid can't hack it in here, fire him and bring Lucy back. Because she could. There is no mercy in this dojo! Do you understand me Mr. Evans?!?
If the kid can't hack it in here
We are the flame that purifies.
I really just have one question: During sexual congress, has Mr. Evans ever screamed "BOW TO THE POWER OF XENON!" and if not, why not?
I presume Zenon and Xenon are pronounced the same.
Dammit! EDIT BUTTON!
Who hasn't?
Virgins. But with a name like Zenon, I don't see how that could be the case.
I have always said that one of the prime advantages to me of being gay is the ability to scream out my own name during sex and it not being weird.
Just ask nicole, girls are into that.
Yeah, but then you find ones that aren't and they get all pissy. I also like to shout "I'M THE BEST! I'M THE BEST!" and nobody puts up with that. I settle for muttering it in between bouts of convulsive coughing.
What does being gay have to do with it?
I have a gendered first name. I really don't want to date a girl with it.
Ladyboys. That's the solution.
Psst kid, want some candy?
Wait, who told him not to read the comments?
Also, he seems to have our number:
Where's Old Man With Candy when you need him?
Back with Postrel was in charge no one would have told the interns to avoid the comments.
It would have been nice to include a link to DuckDuckGo's site, but I guess I can just Google it.
https://duckduckgo.com/
That's exactly what I didn't want to do. Thanks Ag.
Startpage is superior
Really? DDG must really suck then.
Startpage is superior, but DDG is ok.
How do we know that DDG doesn't do what its promos say it doesn't do?
Exactly. Assuming they're not already 'cooperating' with the NSA, it's only a matter of time before they're 'encouraged' to do so. I hope the CEO doesn't do a lot of international travel(or internal travel nowadays...).
Given the way the spooks have interpreted their legal framework, I'm sure they think they have the right to install servers to slurp up IP addresses with search queries as they're entered. No need for DDG to store anything, and if it happened then DDG couldn't tell us about it anyway.
well said. And I would advise that all programs and systems should be considered vulnerable, even open source. Are you downloading a binary or are you building it yourself? And the larger a program the more likely that code review can miss something nefarious which allows for a later exploit.
Where's the link to it?
No email? What's your address going to be anyway, Donald@DuckDuckGo?
I was using DDG before it was cool. Mainly because I don't like having my search results filtered based on what Google thinks I want to see.
Poseurs.
You can disable personalized results on Google, FWIW.
Duck Duck Go is ok. It's not as good as startpage.com though.
I have a weakness for cartoon ducks. Functionally, I tried a few searches and it looks sharp and organized. Google is cluttered by comparison.
I miss the NEAR operator AltaVista had.
Or Scroogle, which just submits to Google for you.