Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Privacy Friendly Search Engine DuckDuckGo Sees Surge in Users After NSA Scandal

Zenon Evans | 6.20.2013 2:36 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

DuckDuckGo, a relatively small-scale search engine, has seen a sudden surge in activity. Although the site lacks image searches, maps, email services, and other bells and whistles common on sites like Google, DuckDuckGo makes up for its lack of window dressing by offering users something they won't find on a massive search engine: anonymity.

Thanks to the NSA scandal, Americans are once again thinking about privacy. DuckDuckGo recorded a 33% surge in users over the last two weeks, according to a CNBC Closing Bell report. According to an interview with the Independent, the site has also experience 69% growth in direct searches.

Gabriel Weinberg, the founder and CEO of DuckDuckGo, thinks he knows why people are choosing the stripped-down search engine:

"We always knew people didn't want to be tracked, but what hadn't happened was reporting on the private alternatives and so it's no surprise that people are making a choice to switch to things that that will give them great results and also have real privacy," 

DuckDuckGo's uptick follows recent revelations made about the National Security Agency. The government agency was exposed for operating a program called PRISM, which collects vast amounts of meta data on American citizens. One of the most disconcerting aspects of the scandal was that private technology companies, such as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, and Verizon, complied with requests for user information. Weinberg explained why DuckDuckGo never got roped into the government program:

Basically, most tech companies store user information—like searches, email account data, searches on social platforms—in data warehouses, so that it can be accessed again. But DuckDuckGo opts to throw any of that information away and not to save it, Weinberg said. 

[…] "We had zero inquiries and the reason for that is because we don't store any data," Weinberg said. "So if they come to us—which they know because it's in our privacy policy—we have nothing to hand over, it's all anonymous data."

Although the company prides itself on privacy, the CEO did suggest his belief that users "are staying because they're getting a better search experience," because "DuckDuckGo gets its results from over one hundred sources," and there is "less clutter, less spam."

Despite the recent surge and Weinstein's vision of a better user experience, DuckDuckGo is still small: "Our next milestone is to hit 1% of the search market share. We are about halfway towards that goal."

Currently, the search engine's duck graphic links to the site "call.stopwatching.us," which offers a petition to "end to the NSA's unconstitutional surveillance programs" as well as a phone number to call legislators and "demand real answers."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: White House Touts "Saving Money" as a Reason to Pass Immigration Reform; Saving Money Makes an Even Better Reason to Cut Spending!

Zenon Evans is a former Reason staff writer and editor.

PolicyNSAScience & TechnologyCivil LibertiesGoogleFacebookTechnologyScandal
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (46)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    The duck doesn't want to know what you're searching.

    Much better Zenon. Much better.

  2. DJK   12 years ago

    How long till Congress mandates that search engines must store search records?

    1. Raston Bot   12 years ago

      The DOJ will just interpret an already existing regulation as such and gag the decision.

    2. Free Society   12 years ago

      The next time a CISPA/PIPA law gets logrolled into some spending bill.

      1. DJK   12 years ago

        Exactly. I guess we just have to hope that such services keep popping up, preferably open source and out of country.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    We always knew people didn't want to be tracked, but what hadn't happened was reporting on the private alternatives...

    That's called advertising. Buy some.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      They did. But it was all internet ads hosted on Google.

  4. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

    I was told it's not wise to read the comments on http://Reason.com . I couldn't resist. I'm as entertained as I am creeped out.

    It looks like someone besides the NSA is keeping tabs on our online hijinks.

    1. Brett L   12 years ago

      Obviously, we need some politcal slashfic from SugarFree to break in the new guy.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        We should get the kid to write an article about which kind of beer goes best with deep dish pizza topped by circumcision cuttings from aborted fetuses.

        1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

          Pickled schmuck?

        2. darius404   12 years ago

          Ewwwww.... beer?

      2. BuSab Agent   12 years ago

        Slashfic from SF doesn't break people in...it breaks them period.

      3. Episiarch   12 years ago

        If the kid can't hack it in here, fire him and bring Lucy back. Because she could. There is no mercy in this dojo! Do you understand me Mr. Evans?!?

        1. SugarFree   12 years ago

          If the kid can't hack it in here

          We are the flame that purifies.

      4. SugarFree   12 years ago

        I really just have one question: During sexual congress, has Mr. Evans ever screamed "BOW TO THE POWER OF XENON!" and if not, why not?

        1. Brett L   12 years ago

          I presume Zenon and Xenon are pronounced the same.

          1. SugarFree   12 years ago

            Dammit! EDIT BUTTON!

        2. sarcasmic   12 years ago

          Who hasn't?

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            Virgins. But with a name like Zenon, I don't see how that could be the case.

          2. SugarFree   12 years ago

            I have always said that one of the prime advantages to me of being gay is the ability to scream out my own name during sex and it not being weird.

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              Just ask nicole, girls are into that.

              1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                Yeah, but then you find ones that aren't and they get all pissy. I also like to shout "I'M THE BEST! I'M THE BEST!" and nobody puts up with that. I settle for muttering it in between bouts of convulsive coughing.

            2. sarcasmic   12 years ago

              What does being gay have to do with it?

              1. SugarFree   12 years ago

                I have a gendered first name. I really don't want to date a girl with it.

                1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                  Ladyboys. That's the solution.

    2. Agammamon   12 years ago

      Psst kid, want some candy?

    3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      Wait, who told him not to read the comments?

      Also, he seems to have our number:

      Reason Commenters- you're like the folks I hung out with under bleachers at football games. Very funny but I'd be afraid to get in your car.

      Where's Old Man With Candy when you need him?

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        Back with Postrel was in charge no one would have told the interns to avoid the comments.

  5. Spiny Norman   12 years ago

    It would have been nice to include a link to DuckDuckGo's site, but I guess I can just Google it.

    1. Agammamon   12 years ago

      https://duckduckgo.com/

    2. darius404   12 years ago

      That's exactly what I didn't want to do. Thanks Ag.

  6. Dibbler   12 years ago

    Startpage is superior

    1. Raston Bot   12 years ago

      Really? DDG must really suck then.

    2. Juice   12 years ago

      Startpage is superior, but DDG is ok.

  7. Hash Brown   12 years ago

    How do we know that DDG doesn't do what its promos say it doesn't do?

    1. jasno   12 years ago

      Exactly. Assuming they're not already 'cooperating' with the NSA, it's only a matter of time before they're 'encouraged' to do so. I hope the CEO doesn't do a lot of international travel(or internal travel nowadays...).

      Given the way the spooks have interpreted their legal framework, I'm sure they think they have the right to install servers to slurp up IP addresses with search queries as they're entered. No need for DDG to store anything, and if it happened then DDG couldn't tell us about it anyway.

      1. Stilgar   12 years ago

        well said. And I would advise that all programs and systems should be considered vulnerable, even open source. Are you downloading a binary or are you building it yourself? And the larger a program the more likely that code review can miss something nefarious which allows for a later exploit.

  8. Wintermute   12 years ago

    Where's the link to it?

  9. CE   12 years ago

    No email? What's your address going to be anyway, Donald@DuckDuckGo?

  10. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

    I was using DDG before it was cool. Mainly because I don't like having my search results filtered based on what Google thinks I want to see.

    Poseurs.

    1. Thane-kin   12 years ago

      You can disable personalized results on Google, FWIW.

  11. Juice   12 years ago

    Duck Duck Go is ok. It's not as good as startpage.com though.

  12. StackOfCoins   12 years ago

    I have a weakness for cartoon ducks. Functionally, I tried a few searches and it looks sharp and organized. Google is cluttered by comparison.

    1. Robert   12 years ago

      I miss the NEAR operator AltaVista had.

  13. Robert   12 years ago

    Or Scroogle, which just submits to Google for you.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Are the News Media in Their Onion Era?

Joe Lancaster | From the June 2025 issue

Alton Brown on Cultural Appropriation, Ozempic, and the USDA

Nick Gillespie | From the June 2025 issue

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!