Opposition to Snooping Unites Liberals and Libertarians
Oddly, it's also uniting Democratic and Republican control freaks
Nothing brings the left and the right together quite like government snooping.
Fears of Big Brother have the likes of liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders and libertarian Sen. Rand Paul sounding the alarm over the National Security Administration sweeping up millions of phone records and mining the activity of Internet users.
The same coalition – call them "liberal-tarians" — has come together on other issues over the years, from opposition to the Iraq war to gay marriage and medical marijuana, helping to nudge evolving public attitudes, which eventually drove policy changes. …
Listen to Paul and Sanders on this issue, and it's a little hard to tell them apart.
"I think the irony is that people voted for President Obama hoping for something different," Paul said. "They were hoping for someone who'd protect the First Amendment, someone who'd protect the Fourth Amendment and there are good progressives and liberals in our country who do and there are good conservatives who believe that."
Sanders told reporters he's shocked by the breadth of the program.
"I worry what it would mean for American civil liberties, but I will tell you I never ever expected that under any definition of that legislation that it would mean the phone calls of millions and millions of Americans — virtually none of whom the government has any reason to believe is involved in terrorism — would be checked by the United States government," Sanders said.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"call them "liberal-tarians""
Uh, pretty sure Rand Paul wouldn't qualify for that term.
To many diehard conservatives Rand Paul is a pinko commie leftist who would rather bleat for the rights of brown skinned sandn*ggers than stick up for the safety of 'Merican children.
What the article should have included:
And excuse the entire mess, since BOOSH!
Im sure the cosmotarians can't control their ejaculating excitement over the nonexistant "liberaltarian" once again coming up.
We've been here before, and there's no possible alliance between classical liberals/libertarians and progressives. The first is dedicated to individual liberty, the latter to whatever totalitarian nationalist central planning that is the flavor of the decade, whether it's eugenics or nationalized health care.
If it finally becomes the most important issue to a large group of Americans, I could see a potential alliance, if only temporary.
Some of them might actually open their eyes when they start realizing that their totalitarian nationalist central planning utopia requires this sort of massive internal snooping.