Law Hobbles Companies' Abilities To Resist Surveillance

Secret courts and classified proceedings


U.S. Internet companies that want to resist government demands to hand over customer data for intelligence investigations have few legal options, due to the classified nature of such probes and a court review process shrouded in secrecy.

Google Inc, Facebook Inc and Microsoft Corp are among the big U.S. technology companies that were outed this week as key sources of data for the National Security Agency (NSA), under a surveillance program referred to inside the spy agency as Prism.

While the companies have uniformly denied knowledge of Prism and said they had not given the NSA direct access to their servers, U.S. officials have confirmed the existence of the program, which President Barack Obama defended as "a modest encroachment" on privacy that was necessary to protect national security. …

For electronic service providers, the law says the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in Washington can authorize a company to provide "all information, facilities, or assistance necessary." In return for compliance, the company is compensated for its work and receives immunity from potential lawsuits.

Section 702 is a "broad tool to get the information they are looking for," said Matt Zimmerman, a lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco civil liberties group critical of the law.

NEXT: Many Companies Cooperated With NSA on Surveillance

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. There are no more American Heroes.

    Not even when you have the protection a gazillion dollars (like a Gates or Zuckerberg) gives you, will you tell government to go fuck itself.

    If you’re in the military, you really ought to ask yourself what precisely are you “defending”. Is it worth defending?

    And don’t come up with any of that silly-assed “freedom and liberty” bullshit. That would be laughable.

    We’re all sheeple, and we should be ashamed of ourselves.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.