Obama Administration Defends Secret Email Accounts for Agency Heads
Claims it's about avoid being inundated with emails
A White House spokesman said Tuesday there's nothing secret about the secret email accounts held by administration officials, and defended the practice as sensible time management.
Asked about revelations that some Obama Cabinet officials including former EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson have used secret alias email addresses, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the subterfuge "makes eminent sense" because those officials would otherwise be swamped with unwanted messages. He said other administrations also have used the secret — or in his words, "alternate" — email accounts.
"There's nothing secret," Mr. Carney said. "It's about having a public email address as well as … one for internal, you know, workings."
While at EPA, Ms. Jackson used the email address "Windsor.Richard@epa.gov" for important business. The agency even awarded the fictional staffer's email account certificates proving that he had mastered all of the EPA's technology training.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'Hey, I'm the chosen one. I said transparent and enough idiots believe me. So what?'
I'm sure they registered all their accounts used purely for internal work with their FOIA folks, too, right?
Well, it's certainly feasible that because one didn't people are mistakenly assuming that about the others, so I suppose it's a question that needs to be answered. There's a difference between for-internal-use-only and illegally-used-to-evade-FOIA.