Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Justice Department to Hold Seminar Warning Against the Legal 'Consequences' of Anti-Muslim Speech

Matt Welch | 5.31.2013 1:59 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Via Instapundit and Judicial Watch comes this troubling article in Tennessee's The Tullahoma News about an upcoming conference entitled "Public Disclosure in a Diverse Society," in which Kenneth Moore, special agent in charge of the FBI's Knoxville Division, and Bill Killian, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, will warn citizens about the criminal dangers of Facebooking hate speech. Excerpt:

Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media.

"This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion," Killian told The News Monday. "This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are." […]

Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.

"That's what everybody needs to understand," he said.

Killian said slide show presentations will be made.

I sincerely hope they make that Power Point public, since I'm unaware of any federal civil rights prosecutions for "inflammatory" Facebook postings, and want to keep up to speed with the Obama administration's increasingly brazen encroachment on free expression.

Reason on free speech and Islam here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bachmann Rival Drops Out of Race After She Announces Exit

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyCivil LibertiesIslamBarack ObamaFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (109)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John   12 years ago

    It has been a while since law school. But as I remember civil rights violations in the criminal context apply to government officials or a private person obstructing someone from exercising a civil right, like say a Black Panther in Philadelphia keeping white people from voting. But I cannot recall a single civil rights law that makes it a crime for people to say mean things on the internet.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      It's the inevitable landing place if we keep criminalizing "hate" and harassment.

      That said, it's flagrantly illegal. It's illegal even to suggest it, because that statement can chill speech. I expect his resignation on my desk in the morning.

      1. John   12 years ago

        It is. They have to know that this is totally at odds with the law. But they say it anyway because they don't care. The idea is to put the idea out figuring a good number of people will believe it and thus stop speaking.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          That's why officials who say they're going to do something blatantly illegal should lose their jobs. Period. No exceptions.

          1. Bryan C   12 years ago

            But they DO lose their jobs! Look at those IRS people!

            Of course, they immediately got a new, better job at a higher salary with no loss of pension, but that's just a technicality.

        2. Smells Like Tom Skerritt   12 years ago

          "The idea is to put the idea out figuring a good number of people will believe it and thus stop speaking."

          Well not me, buster. And Kenneth Moore and Bill Killian need to come clean regarding the rumors swirling around that Kenneth Moore and Bill Killian are tag-team fuckers of sheep.

          BTW, Fuck Mohummad.

          1. Harvard   12 years ago

            [BTW, Fuck Mohummad.]

            Pussy. Show me some stones. Utter such in E. Dearborn whilst adorned with a sandwich board emblazened with your TRUE name, address, place of employment, children's names, etc.

        3. Ben the Duck   12 years ago

          Show me the faith you're not allowed to mock or disparage in any conceivable way, and I'll show you your Official State Religion.

          1. Smells Like Tom Skerritt   12 years ago

            ^^THIS^^

      2. Dweebston   12 years ago

        I'm onboard if by resignation you mean erotic photo spread. All that authoritarian posturing chills my speech, if you know what I mean.

        1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          Resignation for me, disturbing materials for Dweebston.

    2. fish_remote   12 years ago

      All that needs be done is start changing the behavior of the citizenry......

      PS:Bill Killian.....CHRISTFAG you STASI enforcer!

  2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Hasn't SCOTUS ruled that you can burn a cross on a lawn if you're the Klan? How is that less intimidating than posting something bigoted on Facebook or Twitter?

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      You don't know the power of the Internet!

      1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        Or you can burn a cross on a lawn but don't you dare post a picture of it on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram!

    2. alan_s   12 years ago

      They seriously ruled that you can burn a cross on someone else's lawn? I'm asking because I don't know.

      1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

        On your lawn. They didn't make trespassing to burn crosses legal.

    3. sarcasmic   12 years ago

      Just don't tear up a copy of the Koran. They'll put you in prison for that shit.

  3. tarran   12 years ago

    Once again, the Obama administration displays how mind-numbingly incompetent and delusional they are.

    They aren't Brittaing government, they are Pierceing it. 😀

    1. albo   12 years ago

      They're the worst.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        You don't get to say that.

      2. AuH20   12 years ago

        You are just saying that to fit in!

  4. Dweebston   12 years ago

    What consquences might those be? Posters of inflammatory content will be targeted extra hard for their parole violations?

    1. John   12 years ago

      And IRS audits.

      1. Ben the Duck   12 years ago

        Chief Inquisitor Holder will be going into greater detail, re: all of this, during an intimate little "off-the-record" confab with select monsignori of the press later this week.

      2. RBS   12 years ago

        And FBI conspiracy investigations.

      3. Bryan C   12 years ago

        And OSHA inspections.

    2. Sevo   12 years ago

      Dweebston| 5.31.13 @ 2:08PM |#
      "What consquences might those be?"

      Well, if you do a movie, it could lead to people being killed in diplomatic enclosures!
      That's what Obozo claims.

  5. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

    Slandering people anonymously is what the internet is for. That and porn.

    1. albo   12 years ago

      And cat photos.

      1. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

        We'll just say pussy. That covers both.

        1. albo   12 years ago

          *boom, tish*
          I'll be sure to tip my waitress.

        2. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

          Problem with that shedding pussy?

          1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

            You are so evil. I'm going to self medicate to get that guy's voice out of my head.

          2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

            I prefer the Jaboody Dub version:

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlSF0dtDRD8

  6. Killazontherun   12 years ago

    inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims

    However, if your local Iman is preaching 'May Allah rain death upon the Jews' at prayer the evening, carry on. Business as usual.

    1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      'this' for 'the' and 'i' for 'I'. Jeez.

  7. albo   12 years ago

    Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.

    How in dog's name is that possible? Maybe if I'm posting a house for rent with "no Jews, no blacks, no Muslims, no WOW players."

    But otherwise, it's just words, and they ain't violations.

  8. Tim   12 years ago

    Headline from 2014:

    " Secretary Blames Embassy Attack on 'Hateful and Disgusting' Facebook Page. Kentucky Man Arrested"

    1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      Straight out of last week in Britain when some people twitted their outrage after the beheading on the streets of London at Muslim cultural conditioning poisoning minds and all Brits having to bear the consequence in less than polite terms got them arrested.

  9. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Sure this is bad, but it's just an intrinsic aspect of government. As libertarians, we shouldn't be seeking retribution but rather passively contemplating on the aspects of government which lead to such abuse. Heaven knows we shouldn't look to get this poor guy fired!

    /Suderman

    1. Kaptious Kristen   12 years ago

      Silly Trouser - Federal employees can't be fired!!

  10. Dweebston   12 years ago

    I'm curiouse what incentivizes rank-and-file bureaucrats to stick their necks out on obviously controversial projects like this. Is it career saavy? Were these jokers assigned to a panel called "hate speech and the Anglicizing of American speech laws"?

    1. Dweebston   12 years ago

      Or maybe a belated effort to jump onboard the Innocence of the Muslims scapegoating for some blatant mission creep? What drives this mentality?

      1. Bryan C   12 years ago

        Maybe Kenneth Moore is angling for Apple's Chief Diversity Officer position, to be created shortly after the next round of Congressional inquisitions.

  11. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.

    Mohammedans are expressly forbidden from reading this comment

  12. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

    Get with the program, people! Free speech is only for people who have the correct thoughts.

  13. albo   12 years ago

    Recently in my area the association of animal wardens sent out press releases reminding people in X county that state law requires dog owners to buy a dog license every year, and that they would be doing "compliance checks" in the county.

    http://www.pennlive.com/midsta.....anvas.html

    Nobody had any idea how they would do a "compliance check" without a warrant, and they didn't want to explain. It was all about using governmental threats to force compliance.

    1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      Bureaucrats are a weird bunch and have social dysfunctions that are unique to their kind. Can you imagine anyone but a government employee setting his suicide up to look like the action of an anti-government militia? One of them did just that.

      1. CAB   12 years ago

        Do you have a link to this?

        1. Redmanfms   12 years ago

          It was Bill Sparkman census taker back in 2009. His death was hailed as Tea Party violence and even after the fact that he had offed himself was revealed, the usual suspects were out touting this as the result of Tea Party people being mean to precious federal employees.

          Unless Killa had some other weasel in mind.

    2. sarcasmic   12 years ago

      They'll just go to homes where people didn't renew their dog license, and if the dog isn't already dead they'll shoot it.

  14. Tim   12 years ago

    " White House Blames Embassy Attack on 'Insipid Cat Video'. Internet Service Shutdown Under FCC Extraordinary Authority."

  15. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

    Tennessee? The home of the anti-mosque building legislation and anti-Sharia law initiatives.

    I remember when Flava Cain supported the no-mosque laws there (the "Constitutional Conservative" he is).

    1. Tim   12 years ago

      The only consolation here is that soon trolling will be a Federal crime.

      1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        How do you justify a no-mosque law? I always wanted to ask a proponent that.

        1. fish_remote   12 years ago

          Who the fuck is "Flava Cain" shreeky?

          1. Jeff   12 years ago

            That's shriKKKe speak for some Negro what don't know his place.

          2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

            Herman 'Flava' Cain. Comedian and GOP POTUS candidate.

            1. Dweebston   12 years ago

              Herman Cain, luminary of the Republican establishment, the man who supported Americans in their fight to exclude mosques from their communities, whatever that means. Obviously an icon for libertarians.

            2. fish_remote   12 years ago

              Shouldn't you be back in moms basement drinking grape juice and playing "Stock Market Tycoon?

        2. Tim   12 years ago

          I don't propone that. ANd fuck McCain.

        3. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

          What law? Wasn't it a county that tried to block a mosque that was later forced to allow it by a court? So the whole state should burn?

          1. Mad Scientist   12 years ago

            Just because only a few people tried to make that into a law, and lost, doesn't mean that everyone in Tennessee isn't a racist asshole. How else do you expect Shrike to build his strawman army?

            1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

              I rather like Tennessee. And Tennesseans. Not that they don't have their own issues--like the rest of the country.

            2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

              My point was that a leading candidate of the GOP POTUS primaries supported a blatantly anti-Constitutional law.

              1. Dweebston   12 years ago

                Sun rises, sun sets. Both wings of your beloved Party embrace base-pandering causes in defiance of the tattered paper Constitution they swore to uphold.

              2. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

                You really are a dense moron, aren't you? I'm going to spell it out s l o w l y for you so maybe you'll understand this time.

                T H I S.
                I S.
                N O T.
                A.
                G O P.
                B L O G.

                Got it yet?

                1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

                  Oh. I thought we were the Popular Front.

                  1. Ben the Duck   12 years ago

                    SPLITTER!!!

                  2. Ted S.   12 years ago

                    I think libertarians are the Unpopular Front. 🙁

              3. Smells Like Tom Skerritt   12 years ago

                "My point was that a leading candidate of the GOP POTUS primaries supported a blatantly anti-Constitutional law."

                HEY YOU STUPID CUNT, THIS IS NOT A REPUBLICAN WEBSITE. HOW CAN ANYONE BE THIS FUCKING STUPID YEAR IN AND YEAR OUT?

    2. fish_remote   12 years ago

      Fuck off cockpuppet!

    3. Paul.   12 years ago

      Tony likes him.

  16. Lyle   12 years ago

    I say a citizen's arrest should be made upon this government official.

  17. Hyperion   12 years ago

    Oh come on now, folks. The Swedes are being all PC and extra nicey with the Muslims, and see how well that is working out? The Muslims only burned 50 cars in the streets yesterday. If they hadn't made saying mean things about the Muslims, a hate crime, it could have been 60 cars!

    1. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

      The Swedes are fucking clueless here, no doubt.

      But what do you suggest they do?

      1. mad libertarian guy   12 years ago

        Tell their pussy cops to stop standing off to the side and, you know, protect some shit rather than cowering in fear of thrown rocks?

        For starters.

        If the state is going to actively step aside while the rights of their citizens are being blatantly violated, what is the fucking point of the state?

        Buck up, or GTFO.

        1. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

          If I were a Swede who owned a car, and the cops were just standing around while some yahoos tried to set it on fire, I'd obtain any kind of weapon I could and retaliate. If the state won't do their job, the people should.

          -jcr

          1. Harvard   12 years ago

            In Sweden that "weapon" might be a broom. Good luck with that.

            1. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

              I'm sure a molotov cocktail is just as effective against a vandal as it is against a car.

              -jcr

      2. wareagle   12 years ago

        crackdown on lawbreakers? To paraphrase what someone else said, show me the religion that is allowed to run roughshod over your laws, and that's your state religion.

        1. Ben the Duck   12 years ago

          The American left preference is always, always to side with society's predators, rather than their chosen prey.

          http://twitchy.com/2013/05/31/.....t-rapists/

      3. Bryan C   12 years ago

        Shoot them.

        1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

          If the citizenry were well armed, the cops wouldn't have to do shit. If I ever see anyone throwing a molotov at my car or people trying to tip it over, they're getting a hollow point to the midsection. One or two down oughta spread the word quickly to steer clear of that particular property.

    2. Ben the Duck   12 years ago

      Paying big, big dividends in Australia, as well.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_gang_rapes

      1. Hyperion   12 years ago

        In Limeytardia, as well. But don't worry, the British youth and the 'Libertarian' mayor of London are going to fix all of that (snickers uncontrollably).

  18. sarcasmic   12 years ago

    Anti-Muslim speech is crime because we're supposed to be tolerant of other religions and cultures.

    Anti-Christian speech is just tolerant people speaking out against those intolerant religious nuts who hate gays and abortion.

    Wait a sec...

    1. Paul.   12 years ago

      And cling to their guns. Muslims don't cling to their... oh wait.

      1. Floridian   12 years ago

        Some cling to their bombs until they are pried from the charred dead fingers.

        1. Floridian   12 years ago

          The = their

        2. LynchPin1477   12 years ago

          I think by that point, the bombs have already been vaporized or scattered over a radius of several hundred feet.

      2. Palin's Buttplug   12 years ago

        Got Bitter Clingers in every shitty religion.

        1. sarcasmic   12 years ago

          Keep your inability to wipe your ass properly to yourself. That's just gross.

      3. A Serious Man   12 years ago

        *cough*Nidal Hassaan*cough*

    2. Killazontherun   12 years ago

      You have to ask yourself, 'why is the protective exceptionalism of the FBI aimed at Muslims?'

      It is a justification for expanding and flexing their power. 'Protecting' unpopular minorities has long been the potpourri that the FBI uses to dust its bullshit of foul odor.

      1. Harvard   12 years ago

        Or, maybe they're reading the Chief Executive as a Muslim himself, from the evidence at hand?

  19. creech   12 years ago

    Having had some experience being misquoted in newspapers, it is possible the "Tullahoma News" reporter put down what he/she thought was said. Maybe the local LP chapter should ask the newspaper if that
    quote is verbatim, and then arrange to be present at the seminar and
    see if the seminar leaders stand by their allegations. At which point a stink can be made and calls made for their firing (which, of course, won't happen). The LP needs to be out in front on such issues and make some news.

  20. LynchPin1477   12 years ago

    Rogue agents, no doubt. No approval from above, no doubt. They will be disciplined, no doubt.

  21. Goldwyn Smith   12 years ago

    Is the "social tolerance" that that TEH YUTES support?

  22. Tonio   12 years ago

    It's not just muslims. The FBI is also doing outreach to the gay (etc) community. A few weeks ago I got an email from the local gay community center with the monthly event calendar. One of the events was a presentation by FBI agents on hate speech. I deleted the email message, but wish I'd have saved it now.

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      It'd probably be an interesting talk to go to. You'd probably need prophylactic sedation before sitting through something like that though.

    2. Tonio   12 years ago

      The event has already occurred, I believe. I considered going to it, but it seemed like a bad idea since I don't have access to prescription grade sedatives.

      1. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

        Just voice your dissent to their meddling. There will be plenty of sedatives at the re-education camp.

  23. Fool   12 years ago

    You have a right not to be killed, robbed, raped, or beaten. You have no right to be loved, and if you have enough political power to compel feigned lvoe you probably don't need it anyway.

  24. Rich   12 years ago

    Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media.

    "The following inflammatory documents are explicitly not targeted at Muslims; they are targeted at people who hate Muslims."

    Better?

  25. MattJ   12 years ago

    Hello, this is Killian. Give me the Justice Department, Entertainment Division.

  26. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

    Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media.

    More like: "Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at anything that is not the most glowing descriptions Muslims on social media."

  27. John C. Randolph   12 years ago

    There are no legal consequences for "anti-Muslim" speech in the USA. There are, however, massive illegal and unconstitutional consequences, as the poor guy in the picture above found out.

    -jcr

  28. ToiletsonIce   12 years ago

    "Damn it! We're the only ones allowed to target Muslims!" --U.S. military drone pilots

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Americans Celebrate Independence Day Less Proud of Their Country Than Ever

J.D. Tuccille | 7.2.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Take a Bite out of Crime

Charles Oliver | 7.2.2025 4:00 AM

Trump's 'Giant Win' Does Not Validate His Unconstitutional Birthright Citizenship Order

Jacob Sullum | 7.2.2025 12:01 AM

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Medicaid Work Requirements Are a Short-Term Fix to a Long-Term Problem

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 4:18 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!