IRS

Data Doesn't Support IRS Explanation for Scandal

No surge of non-profit applications when scrutiny began

|

Applications for tax exemption from advocacy nonprofits had not yet spiked when the Internal Revenue Service began using what it admits was inappropriate scrutiny of conservative groups in 2010.

In fact, applications were declining, data show.

Top IRS officials have been saying that a "significant increase" in applications from advocacy groups seeking tax-exempt status spurred its Cincinnati office in 2010 to filter those requests by using such politically loaded phrases as "Tea Party," "patriots," and "9/12."

Both Steven Miller, the agency's acting commissioner until he stepped down Wednesday, and Lois Lerner, director of the agency's exempt-organization division, have said over the past week that IRS officials started the scrutiny after observing a surge in applications for status as 501(c)(4) "social welfare" groups. Both officials cited an increase from about 1,500 applications in 2010 and to nearly 3,500 in 2012. President Obama ask Mr. Miller to resign on Wednesday.

The scrutiny began, however, in March 2010, before an uptick could have been observed, according to data contained in the audit released Tuesday from the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

4 responses to “Data Doesn't Support IRS Explanation for Scandal

  1. You mean Obozo’s tossing red herrings?! No!!!

  2. I wish I could say this were at all surprising. But it’s not. At all. The “spike in applications” excuse was always dubious. If you had a spike in your workload, you’d seek out ways to devote LESS processing time to any application, rather than increasing the workload of any one application.

    1. When IRS agents get a spike in the workload, the handle it by demanding to see facebook pages, group literature, reading lists, donor lists, prayer contents, etc. Then, they take little breaks during the day perusing applicants’ private thoughts. It helps lighten a stressful and dreary workload.

  3. Apparently presenting even a remotely rational excuse is no longer required. Give the media thin gruel and it will process it into a fine meal.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.