Chris Brown Charged with Abusing Neighborhood's Aesthetics
Singer with scary reputation paints scary faces on his home


Former Doublemint gum salesman Chris Brown (also known in some circles for singing and beating up Rhianna) is expressing himself artistically at his Hollywood Hills home through paint rather than music. It doesn't appear that the neighbors are on board with his aesthetic, which is big red faces full of giant sharp teeth. He is painting them on the wall outside his house. The Los Angeles Times reports:
Responding to complaints about the art, L.A. city code officials cited Brown for unpermitted and excessive signage and ordered him to remove the art within 30 days. He also faces fines that start at $376 but could rise significantly if he fails to comply.
Brown on Saturday defended the artwork.
"There are scarier creatures on Harry Potter," he wrote via Twitter. "Get a … life!"
He also wrote "ima paint until my hands fall off."
Brown's attorney, Mark Geragos, said the musician is not backing down. He says it's the neighbors who are harassing Brown.
"I'm scared of neighborhood busybodies like this," Geragos said. "They've called animal control. They have sicced parking [enforcement] on him, and now they reached the heights of ridiculousness here. Shame on them."
The Times notes that most of the murals seen all over Los Angeles are painted illegally. Geragos invoked the First Amendment to protect Brown's right to paint weird stuff. The president of the local civic association claims the children are terrified:
"There are lots of babies, lots of children, and they're literally frightened. It's like devils on the wall — big, scary eyes and big, scary teeth, and just the whole vibe is not what we're used to," [Patti Negri] said.
I find that claim very unlikely. But then I don't live in Hollywood Hills. Where I live, there's a mural of Papa Smurf using voodoo magic to raise zombies right across the street from a local elementary school. I have yet to see any kids running around terrified of it, though they might be distracted by the ice cream trucks and street vendors who are typically on hand when school lets out.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You have to be some real turds to make Chris Brown a sympathetic figure in a dispute.
NIMBY bullshit is just that reliable.
The article has a poll: do you think his neighbors should have a say in how Chris Brown paints his house? Only 56% say no.
The savvy neighbor would let him trash it, then buy the land on the cheap after he ODs or is murdered by his gigantic tranny girlfriend that totally looked like Rihanna with all the lights off.
"is murdered by his gigantic tranny girlfriend that totally looked like Rihanna with all the lights off"
Plot line of your latest fic?
Kind of like how - as someone here noted, I believe - Nancy Grace consistently ends up looking like the worst person in any murder case she covers. That takes a special person.
When you look like a bigger dick than Chris Brown...
It was delicious watching ol' Nancy after "Tot Mom" Casey Anthony was acquitted.
Why the fuck did she keep calling her "Tot Mom?" I mean, what's the point?
Just reaffirming that I'd still bang Casey Anthony, right now, on my desk - in the conference room - wherever. Right in front of everyone. I'd do it.
And this is why there are no....
Really? I mean, she's attractive, but she very likely murdered her own daughter. Kind of a turn off, isn't it?
Uhhhhhh....hmmmm......no. I wouldnt. Its hard to rise to the occasion when you look at her face and keep imagining her hands on that dead/dying child.
C'mon. Plenty of positions that require no eye contact whatsoever.
Yeah. 'Dat ass.
I. Would. Bang. Her. Right. Now.
No hesitation. Wouldn't think about her dead kid. I'm that much of a monster. Yes.
I'm surprised she's still on TV after how she pretty much was completely humiliated by the Duke lacrosse case.
Grace? You know the saying, "He/she has no shame?"
I hate Chris Brown. I love that graffiti (I think those monsters look funny and cute) and I support Brown's freedom to paint them.
I'd be more annoyed by the fact that I have an unrepentant woman beater living next to me than about his aesthetic taste -- but maybe that's just me.
I was always convinced that Chris Brown got a bum rap on that one...until he beat up that guy in the studio parking lot that time.
You didn't see the pictures of his girlfriend's face?
Oh, that's just what she looks like without makeup!
/dickhead
Oh no, I saw them.
But as far as I can determine, what happened that day is that Chris Brown was driving Rihanna around in his car, and she took his phone and saw that another girl had texted him.
Enraged, she grabbed the wheel of his car, and attempted to crash it, potentially killing them both.
Brown then pulled the car above and punched and choked her.
I asked myself, "If I, Fluffy, was in the car with Chris Brown and tried to murder him because I was angry, and he proceeded to beat the crap out of me, would anyone feel bad for me?" And the answer, I concluded, was No. So I decided not to feel bad for Rihanna.
I get annoyed by incidents where the woman is allowed to engage in whatever violence she wants, because she's "just a girl", and if the male defends himself or retaliates, then it's "domestic violence".
Just about every boy-girl fight I ever saw in high school started with the girl slapping the boy in the face because shr was angry about something or (most often) jealous about something. But I am quite sure that if those interactions took place today, a dozen support groups would be there in ten seconds to tell the girl she was the victim.
What a pathetic way to justify misogyny. If he beat up a guy he would still get punished for that because you know beating people is illegal.
Agree with SpartanGirl. Beating the ever-loving shit out of someone after the fact =/= defending yourself.
Oh, bullshit.
I'm judging the situation as it would be judged if it involved two men.
Sure, we can try to parse the moment at which self-defense would roll over into assault.
But it would never get to the point of that kind of legal analysis if it was two men.
If a guy starts a bar fight and loses it, unless he dies it's VERY rare for the cops or DA to say to the winner of the fight, "OK, after punch #4 it ceased to be self-defense so we're going to charge you."
Uh, are we really going by cops' analysis as the moral gold standard for what is right and wrong?
On this blog, of all places?
OK, then.
This is why there are no female libertarians. Because Fluffy comes up with excuses when women get beaten up.
"You don't wanna beat me or screw me?!? What kind of marriage is this?!? Bring a book."
I agree with Fluffy. Girls start shit all the time. My rule of life is don't start shit with someone bigger and meaner than myself, cause it never ends well for me.
Girls start shit with me too and in most cases I'm stronger than them but I don't hurt them physically. Why? Because beating your chest like a gorilla and resorting to violence doesn't prove anything especially with women. You'll only look like an insecure gorilla not a confident man. Stay classy and just walk away from the drama. That is my motto. You'll save your sanity and won't go to jail.
I think I would have just stopped the car and thrown her bitch ass out of my car. And then drive off and leave her on the side of the road.
"I will leave you as you left me, as you left her; marooned for all eternity in the center of a dead planet..."
If you say that, and she screams "KHAAAN!" as you drive away, do you turn around and pick her back up?
If she screams KHAAAH, she's a keeper.
Also applies when having sex.
In fact, I can't think of any occasion where screaming KHAAAN would not be a marker of good character and fine breeding.
If you say that, and she screams "KHAAAN!" as you drive away, do you turn around and pick her back up?
You turn around and ask her if she would be willing to wear a Lt. Uhura costume to bed.
That would have been a more appropriate response.
Exactly. It ceases to be self-defense when the car is stopped. Beating her up after that point is gratuitous.
I find that claim very unlikely. But then I don't live in Hollywood Hills. Where I live, there's a mural of Papa Smurf using voodoo magic to raise zombies right across the street from a local elementary school. I have yet to see any kids running around terrified of it, though they might be distracted by the ice cream trucks and street vendors who are typically on hand when school lets out.
Of course a radical anarchist libertarian like Shackford wants children to look at unpermitted murals and eat ice cream from unlicensed ice cream trucks and served by an undocumented worker. Won't he think of the poor children?
Without sensible regulations, ice cream trucks will be free to sell kids cigarette- and gun-flavored ice cream in 32 oz non-free range cups.
Do you really want that for America?
What do guns taste like? I must admit, in all the years I have owned and used firearms, I have never licked one.
They taste like freedom, BuSab. They taste like freedom.
Well then we definitely can't have that!
I have often described some of my guns as 'lickalicious', but I admit that I also have never actually licked one.
I have.
They kinda taste like chicken.
srsly
Well, yeah - everyone knows you're supposed to go shooting after double-fisting KFC original recipe!
*boneless*
Gun-flavored
Worse, he describes what sounds like an awesome painting, but refuses to post a picture of it.
I totally would have had I seen this story before going to the office.
They should have let you go home to take the picture before putting this article up. If Welch had a problem with it, just slap him across the face and tell him to stop getting in the way of your art.
They need to stop getting in the way of your art, Scott.
Geez, here...
SF SF'ed!
Disallowed characters? WTF?
Never change, SF, never change.
You never change. Nor, apparently, have your html skills.
Take it easy on him. It's not like there's some magic preview button that allows you to check if you've linked properly before posting.
If that existed, he'd have no excuse.
Preview hasn't worked for me since the registration "upgrades".
Once I deleted my e-mail address from my profile it began to work for me.
But then how will I get hate mail? I'd miss out on so much poorly spelled invective...
WTF?! I have been here for a few years and I am a complete asshole. Why no hate for Marshall?
Fuck you, Marshall. I hated you the moment I laid eyes on your posts.
You're a little bitch Mr. Gill, unworthy of anything but my disdain.
Come now, Marshall. Do you really think you can match our levels of assholeness, day in and day out? We're professionals.
Thanks, Irish, it means a lot.
And, no, Epi, I am certain that I can not match your levels of assholeness, but I am willing to learn. Can I be sent someplace special?
(hands Marshall a Google Maps printout with directions to NutraSweet's mom's house)
Why no hate for Marshall?
Beats me. I've gotten it since the second or third week of posting. There's not as much as there used to be.
And preview works. Thanks, Gilly.
I've gotten it since the second or third week of posting.
Were you, by any chance, doing the slashfiction by then? That shit definitely deserves some hate mail. Or fan mail depending upon taste.
That didn't start until years later. I guess they just lacked the flavor.
Work, damn you!
It works if you copy and paste the address. Holy shit, how adorable is she.
my filter tells me that's NSFW.
An Error Was Encountered
The URI you submitted has disallowed characters.
SUGARFREE, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! SUGAR!! FREE!!!!
I guess I am the disallowed character. 🙁
I thought that was Gumby (DAMN IT!)?
Guess not.
Right click. Copy link location. Remove "://reason.com/blog/2013/05/13/" from the link. Apply to web browser. Get grossed out by aftermath of Papa Smurf blowing a load in some blonde's mouth.
Or better yet I could just fix the damn thing.
There are lots of babies, lots of children, and they're literally frightened.
You know, these type of scum go straight to the "it's for the children" bullshit so immediately at this point that maybe people will become inured to it.
Or it will just lead people like me to be more frightened of babies and children (and the adults who have them) than almost anything else. They seem to be really, really powerful.
Weren't the Salem Witch Trials based mostly on the testimony of young girls?
Youngish, yes. They were probably witches themselves!
Well, she did have a wart on her nose...
Look out! Babies! RUN!!!
Vell you vanted him to grow up in dee city!
Here is the website for Scared Mommy Patti Negri.
http://www.pattinegri.com/
She's a white witch, so she probably doesn't like the depictions of demons. It harshes her aura.
And yes, I would do Patti.
I think it's time for some neighboring Christians to express their fear of natural earth magick infecting their children.
there's a mural of Papa Smurf using voodoo magic to raise zombies
Picture?
I tried to see if google could find it but all that came back was pictures of Gary Busey.
He was the zombie, not the Smurf, right?
From the comments:
If you do something to your own property, how is that any different than someone else doing that same thing to your property? For example, I have stopped going to my house, because if some nefarious element saw me opening the door and going inside, he'd immediately assume that it's okay for him to break into my house.
Of course a glibertarian like you wouldn't understand that.
Why don't we add in some racism/classism to go with the same property rights illiteracy:
I believe Rick James covered this in Charlie Murphy's True Life Stories: "They shoulda never gave y'all n****** money!"
And, again, "Mrs. Smith has crossed the line by having children and thus forcing other people to live in her terrified, anxiety-ridden world. HERE YOU MUST BE NICE TO MY BABIES. N#@### please."
Prozac is one helluva drug...
Not sure if you saw the Friday PM links, but I'm convinced after reading this "Mother's Bill of Rights" that you, Nicole, are morally obligated to have children so you can use your maternal authority to counter this nonsense.
That's revolting. I already do what I can to destroy the innocence of children, so at least I'm doing something.
Anyone who has heard the way a 5th or 6th grader speaks to his friends knows that there is no innocence left to destroy. No one is more vulgar than people between 5th and 8th grade because they're at the point where they think swearing is cool.
Swearing is, has always been, and always will be, the fucking coolest shit ever.
Fuckin-a right, motherfucker! I loves that shit.
I agree, but there has to be an artistry to it. Cursing must be savored, like a fine wine.
When children swear, they do it like some vulgar fat person chugging soda and washing himself in bacon grease. If my child is going to swear, it had better be with some motherfucking class.
When my brother's kid was about 4 years old, I taught her that saying, "shutup" was very rude. She should instead say, "Shut your cock holster!" For some reason he doesn't ask me to watch his kids anymore.
Very classy.
You're as bad as the fuckers hating on Chris' wall.
"Swearing - twas thought up as a compromise twixt fightin' and runnin' away"
Why do you hate children?
'Protect our children's innocence and shield them from gun violence in America, BOTH REAL AND SCRIPTED.'
Not content to obliterate the second amendment, moms the nation over decide to blot out the first as well.
Also, let's just look at the verbs for a minute.
"We have a right to..."
Expect.
Preserve.
Demand.
Know.
Expect.
Demand.
Expect.
Have access to.
Hold accountable.
I mean, sure, you have the right to demand anything you want. Demand away! Go ahead, expect! See where that shit gets you.
Go ahead, expect! See where that shit gets you.
I believe the goal is to add force of government to each of those verbs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_bx6B3dBMM
Barf!
*apologizes to Barfman for trespassing on his territory, but it needed to be done*
"Mother's Bill of Rights"
*barf*
I love how they demand that all public areas are to be 'gun free zones'. Because obviously no mass shooting has ever occurred in an area that has sign prohibiting the carrying of weapons.
Meanwhile, just see the fuss they raise if you ask for a kid-free zone.
I thought they ALL happened in areas that had a sign prohibiting the carrying of weapons...maybe it's the sign's fault.
The only mass shooting in the last 15 years that happened outside a gun-free zone was the Giffords shooting. Everything else (Columbine, VaTech, Auroa, Sandy Hook) were in places were carrying arms was prohibited.
I thought they ALL happened in areas that had a sign prohibiting the carrying of weapons...maybe it's the sign's fault.
It's pure coincidence. Correlation is not causation. Besides, since the signs are not intended to create places where people intent on committing terrible deeds can be certain that everyone there is unarmed and unable to shoot back, the fact that that is the result just simply cannot be true.
Intentions trump results.
Demand that our government create the same strong regulations for guns that they have for toys, cars and food.
Do they mean this in a literal sense, or are they just not at all familiar with existing gun regulations?
Cause while there are a shit ton of regs already in place, there are no regulations that specify the allowable ppm of rat feces in a gun.
I don't do facebook but I had to chuckle when it says "Be the first to like this."
So, no one likes it? Not one? Ha!
"Mrs. Smith has crossed the line by having children and thus forcing other people to live in her terrified, anxiety-ridden world. HERE YOU MUST BE NICE TO MY BABIES. N#@### please."
Nice one. Now my co-workers are probably wondering why I'm laughing.
Holy sheet. Amazing logic
So I'm guessing most of Chris Brown's Hollywood Hills neighbors are not black? Calls of racism to commence in 3...2...1...
John should be here any second to tell us that the neighbors have every right to demand that Chris Brown behave in a way that will maximize their property's exchange value, above and beyond allowing them the quiet enjoyment and use of their property.
You mean, Tulpa?
Unfortunately, no I don't.
That's really the argument here. I think there are limits. Just because it's his property doesn't mean it doesn't affect the value of properties around it.
It's basically like saying my neighbors can play loud music 24/7 and they have every right to do so. No, they don't.
Get a shitty neighbor and then try to sell your own place. That "libertarian" perspective will be an expensive lesson. People who do weird shit to their property DO have an effect on the value of properties around them.
What does property rights have to do with liberty? That's right - nothing.
I'd imagine whatever aesthetic enforcement you'd like the government to provide will require additional taxes. In the long run, the monetary difference between the cost of enforcing aesthetics versus the property value loss comes out to zero or possibly in favor of no enforcement of aesthetics.
In Chris Brown's defense, what would be appropriate behavior after hearing Rihanna's music day in and day out?
what would be appropriate behavior after hearing Rihanna's music day in and day out?
Print out a Liberator pistol and blow your brains out.
I guess some guys really like the camel-faced girls?
If the walls are on his property he should be allowed to do whatever he wants with it. The key word being should. If he lives in an HOA or covenant controlled community, then of course that's not the case. Instead he has to get permission from the busy body committee to do anything with his house.
My wife and are currently planning to paint our house and it's a pain in the fucking ass.
YEah - I'll never buy in an association again. Fortunately, since everything went in the shitter with the economy, the nags have mostly backed off. Still - even the idea that I need to get permission to park my boat in my driveway in the summer (we store it elsewhere in the winter)....irritates me.
I've heard that in some areas you basically have no choice. All of the neighborhoods worth living in have associations. Since so many people are sheep, you may not have the choice.
Well in libertopia I think HOAs as they exist now would either be nonexistent or powerless. (actual shared ownership e.g. if they are paying half in exchange for say in the property, is a different matter)
If he was stupid enough to buy into such a community, than I don't have any problem with them enforcing their rules.
Such things are pretty explicit during the purchase process.
HOLY SHIT! SugarFree's name just turned blue! Not orange any more.
I think he turned into a Smurf! WEIRD!!
He got tired of us emailing him to tell him that he SF'd a link.
Here's one, though, not sure if anyone beat me to it.
Crocodile Tears
That is the second time I have seen him cry tears from the outside of his eye. Dont tears normally start on the i inside, next to the nose?
I am probably biased. At this point I doubt there is much he could do to redeem himself in my eyes.
Remember, the Obama is not mere mortal. Maybe that's the way God tears work...
And he lost his monocle!
Well, he best get a new one before PM links, or he's outta the cloob. No exceptions for not having monocle. We have to maintain some degree of worthiness around here.
Speaking of how much we all love SugarFree, my brother-in-law made a T-shirt of this image and gave it to me for Christmas.
DAMN! That is some man love right there. Your BiL is the shizznit!
That is an epic present. You have a great BiL.
And he lost his monocle!
I did. All the kids are calling me Two-Eyes. 🙁
I need preview, damn it. I had to assume the blue name of no-linky shame.
...they might be distracted by the ice cream trucks and street vendors who are typically on hand when school lets out.
Aren't all public schools in capitalism-free zones?
As a former douchebag boss of mine once famously said, "This ain't no democracy"!
"There are lots of babies, lots of children, and they're literally frightened. It's like devils on the wall ? big, scary eyes and big, scary teeth, and just the whole vibe is not what we're used to," [Patti Negri] said"
I suspect they'd still bitch if he painted unicorns and rainbows and butterflies on his crib.
And when, oh when lord, will someone finally decide that, "erp.... children! babies!" does not in fact constitute an argument.
I think there should be an official new-outlet for "The Children" which provides frequent editorials on precisely what it is they *do* think, rather than let hysterical adults constantly speak in their stead
e.g. =
Official Children's Position on Domestic Murals
Awesome, and We Want to Make One On Our House Too.
- Mommy Says Paint is Messy. Give us Ice Cream or We Will Cry.
This is a case where I really don't give a shit if it violates my principles, I wanna see that bastard Chris Brown get fucked for once.
If it can happen to him, it can happen to you. You're willing to lose your rights over Chris Brown having to repaint his house?
Consider for a moment Sam, the concept of rule of law and how it applies to principles in general.
If the only comment here was SugarFree's first one, the comment section would be complete. Kinda hard to beat that.
Still I just have to say; "There are lots of babies, lots of children, and they're literally frightened. It's like devils on the wall ? big, scary eyes and big, scary teeth, and just the whole vibe is not what we're used to," [Patti Negri] said."
Fuck you Patti,fuck what you are used to and fuck the children too.
The irony is that if he had done this on an abandoned 50s-era government office building in the middle of the LA ghetto and emphasized a social justice theme, those same neighbors would probably be lauding him for his progressive bona fides, with the LA Weekly doing a fluffer piece on his "growth" as an artist.
But because it's on his private property and shows monsters, out come the long knives.
Followed the link to see the paintings and they look like something off a Rob Zombie poster.
More comical than scary.
"Where I live, there's a mural of Papa Smurf using voodoo magic to raise zombies right across the street from a local elementary school"
WTF!? I want a link to a picture of the mural, not to a Wiki article about LA.
Racist!