Hard-headed
Bicycle helmet study
Since 1987, 21 states and hundreds of localities have enacted laws requiring bike riders under a certain age to wear helmets. In a study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in February, economists Pinka Chatterji of SUNY-Albany and Sara Markowitz of Emory University ask whether these laws have made children safer.
Chatterji and Markowitz found that head injury rates for children five to 11 years old fell by nearly half from 1991 to 2008. Adjusting for physical, climate, and economic variables that may affect this figure, they found that helmet laws seem to reduce bike-related head injuries by 13.7 percent.
Although that sounds like strong evidence that helmet laws are effective, Chatterji and Markowitz note that the drop in head injuries could be due to less bike riding. They say "evidence in support of the decrease ridership theory comes from the observed increase in injuries in other wheeled sports." Hence "the net effect of these laws on health outcomes is actually not straightforward."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
requiring bike riders under a certain age to wear helmets. In a study published by the National
less bike riding. They say "evidence in support of the decrease ridership theory comes