Sen. Paul Says Clinton's Benghazi Response Should Prevent Her From Holding Office Ever Again
Made the remark during speech to the Missouri Republican Party
Sen. Rand Paul said former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's response to the deadly attacks on Americans in Benghazi, Libya last fall should prevent her from ever holding public office again.
The Kentucky Republican made the remark last week in a speech to the Missouri Republican Party, which just released a full video of his address in a fundraising appeal Tuesday morning.
During a Senate Foreign Affairs Committee hearing earlier this year, Paul told Clinton that he would have relieved her of her position because she didn't read the cable communications requesting additional help and security in Libya.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sen. Paul Says Clinton's Benghazi Response Should Prevent Her From Holding Office Ever Again
Buying an election in New York should have been enough....I guess this will have to do!
I find the immaturity, even downright stupidity, of people making more of Benghazi than it is appalling, but then I've seen every president since Roosevelt come and go. And that makes Rand Paul an absolute political clown as history goes. He has nothing to offer reasonable, well-informed, generally-objective people. Most of us with decent educations have read and followed this sad event with sincerity, and found it to be just that, a sad event. Governments are machines and like all machines, none runs with 100% efficiency so disasters will occur no matter who is in charge. But for political reasons, you have one group doing gymnastics to make it into some major failing of the "other side," and some earth-shattering event. Four people got killed in a dangerous part of the world. Over two dozen got killed in a school that was supposed to be safe. You tell me which event deserves more attention. Grow up.
Considering the government was supposed to make sure the former did not happen, while the latter had nothing to do with government, yeah there's a pretty big fucking difference stupid.