Federal Hacking Case with No Hacking Goes to Jury
Man being tried for accessing a database he was given the password to
The same hacking statute internet sensation Aaron Swartz was being prosecuted under until his January suicide is quietly being tested in a San Francisco federal courtroom — to little fanfare in a case devoid of hacking in the traditional sense.
Swartz's case and his untimely death set off a firestorm across the internet to reform the hacking law known as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act — a statute many suggested the government was abusing. The Swartz prosecution prompted Attorney General Eric Holder to enter the fray, saying it was a "good use of prosecutorial discretion."
But none of that drama associated with the Swartz case and its aftermath is present in the San Francisco courtroom of U.S. District Judge Edward Chen. It's where one of the most bizarre applications of the anti-hacking law is playing itself out to a virtually empty gallery.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?