HI Bill Would Force Business Buyers To Retain Employees
It should mandate profitability, too, to solve all problems
HONOLULU — The Kauffman Foundation's Thumbtack.com gave Hawaii an F for small business friendliness, considering regulations, taxes, labor, hiring, licensing and zoning in determining the bad mark.
Numerous other organizations have deemed Hawaii as the most expensive — or worst — place to own a business.
Hawaii lawmakers, for the most part, have failed to take the warnings seriously, and they've introduced a number of controversial proposals that would place even more restrictions on business owners.
Most onerous is House Bill 642 — "successive owner" legislation — which would force people purchasing a business to retain all employees. In the current draft, the legislation designates the restriction on businesses with 100 or more employees. But as one lawmaker points out, that can easily be lowered this year or in future years to affect companies with considerably fewer employees.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you own a business in HI, it is now worthless.