Biden Continues Pushing Bad Stats while Stumping for Gun Control
Keeps bringing up outdated, decades old background check numbers
Vice President Joe Biden once again used the 20-year-old statistic on background checks today that he and President Obama have repeatedly cited in their push for tighter gun control laws.
Obama has already been called out for saying 40 percent of all gun sales don't require a background check under current law, a number incorrectly pulled from a decades-old report.
But Biden pulled out the statistic several times during a Google+ hangout on gun violence this afternoon to explain the importance of expanding background checks to private gun sales and gun shows. At least 80,000 of the people run through the background check system each year aren't allowed to own a gun, he said. With as many as 5,200 gun shows in the U.S. each year, the 40 percent statistic means at least 30,000 people who buy a gun in a private transaction aren't legally allowed to own that gun, Biden said. The difference is there's no background check to stop the purchase.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'And 90% of the people support my bill!'
I wonder how many people who read that point - that this "40%" figure is from 20 years ago - understand that 20 years ago the background check system was just starting to get off the ground and was not affecting the largest majority of transfers?
So even if it was accurate - which I highly doubt - it practically has nothing to do with background checks.