Imprisoned Environmental Activist Forbidden From Publishing Without Permission From Government
Daniel MacGowan, charged with terrorism and now in a halfway home, has written about being placed in experimental solitary confinement
After more than seven years, the stack of dehumanizing and seemingly unconstitutional interactions between Daniel McGowan and the American prison system is now piled so high it is teetering over into a recursive mess of bleak and Kafkaesque absurdity.
Last Monday, McGowan published a piece on the Huffington Post that laid out much of his situation to date. After years in prison for his role in environmentally motivated property destruction that was prosecuted as acts of terrorism, he wrote, he was finishing up the remaining months of his sentence in a halfway house in Brooklyn.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yeah, but David Palmer wouldn't let that one journalist publish without Sherri's permission during the first 24 hour period of his presidency.
Gods, but I detest this kind of sh*t. I have NO patience for the kind of activist that feels entitled to damage people's property in order to announce their moral superiority, and I strongly feel that a number of Environmentalist groups, specifically including the ELF, have stepped over the line from simple vandalism to low level terrorism. And then the State has to pull something like this. Why can't there be a middle ground between an indulgent "Boys will be boys" attitude and acting like the KGB?