Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Christie is Against Gay Conversion Therapy, Netanyahu Apologizes for Flotilla Raid, Obama Promises Jordan $200 Million: P.M. Links

Matthew Feeney | 3.22.2013 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Credit: The National Guard / Foter.com / CC BY
  • New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has confirmed that he is against gay conversion therapy. 
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has apologized to the Turkish prime minister for the 2010 raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla that left several Turkish nationals dead. 
  • Obama has promised Jordan $200 million in aid, which I'm sure is easy to explain to the kids who couldn't go on tours of the White House. 
  • In other news on sensible spending, the Pentagon wants $49 million for a new prison at Guantánamo Bay for "special" detainees. 
  • France's highest court and an advisory council have both dismissed the 75 percent income tax on the wealthy.
  • Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas.) tried to repeal ObamaCare on its third birthday. 

Follow Reason on Twitter too, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Have a news tip? Send it to us!

The updated Reason app for Apple and Android now includes Reason 24/7!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: David Ranta Freed from Prison

Matthew Feeney is a policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (304)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has confirmed that he is against gay conversion therapy.

    How about asshole conversion therapy? Because banning that would be doing his state a disservice.

    1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

      Are people born assholes? Do I have the elusive "asshole" gene?

      1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        I don't think it's all that elusive.

      2. Rich   12 years ago

        As opposed to the "elusive asshole" gene?

        1. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

          No, my wife has that one.

          1. $park?   12 years ago

            Elusive or evasive?

            1. A Serious Man   12 years ago

              I think he meant 'elastic'.

          2. Rich   12 years ago

            Dominant or submis, uh, recessive?

            1. Xenocles   12 years ago

              I thought it was the receptive asshole gene.

              1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

                What an ass.

    2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods Dev Diary

      Dunno if anyone else has played Crusader Kings II, but if you haven't and you're an RTS fan or a medieval history geek, you owe it to yourself to buy it when it goes on sale.

      1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        Dunno if anyone else has played Crusader Kings II,

        I think I've logged close to 150 hours on it already.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Nice! Haven't done quite that much (it says 70 hours on Steam). Have you tried the Game of Thrones mod for it?

          1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

            Have you tried the Game of Thrones mod for it?

            Not yet. I'm still trying to conquer all of Spain as the Almoravids.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              Haven't played as any of the Muslim dynasties, yet. Lots of fun games with El Cid and restoring the Armenian kingdom as the Bagratids.

              1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

                Be warned, decadence is a bitch.

                1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

                  So I've heard, heh.

      2. John   12 years ago

        I am both. Thanks. You are a great American Trouser.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Enjoy. Amazon had a sale in January where you could get the game + all DLC for $10.

          Playing as any count, duke, king, or emperor in the western world from 1066-1337 has its appeal.

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            Well sure when you have an unarmed citizenry it must be easy!

      3. AuH20   12 years ago

        Holy hell am I excited for this mod. The ability to play pagan as well as the earlier start date look so awesome.

        I have yet to try a Muslim game, though I hear that is all kinds of fucked out.

      4. Capt Ace Rimmer   12 years ago

        That looks so awesome.

    3. DJF   12 years ago

      How is it any of his business unless New Jersey government is doing it.

      1. Juice   12 years ago

        The children?

    4. yonemoto   12 years ago

      What is wrong with gay conversion therapy? It's pretty stupid, but if people want to shell out their money for something that probably won't work for them, isn't that their business?

      Also: Isn't it equally asinine to think that "born gay" is a universally descriptive rationale for homosexuality? Maybe some homosexuals weren't born that way and would like to figure out how to fit in as a hetero. Should we en banc deny them this opportunity?

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        Generally states are forbidding it for minors, not for adults. It's mostly to protect kids from their parents putting them into some quirky therapy situation to "fix" them.

        I'm uncomfortable with the bans, but I was put in therapy by my parents with a "reputable" (at the time) ex-gay therapist, and my experience was utter bullshit. I came away unscarred, mostly by being his "most difficult patient ever," but I can definitely see how it could fuck a kid up who wasn't quite as self-confident.

        Most of the sessions were him trying to convince me that I'd been molested and that that was the emotional root of my homosexuality even though I was never molested. He kept pushing it session after session.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          That's fucked up.

          Jesse, do you know if current laws are sufficient to deal with that problem? I'd hope that any group or camp that tried that kind of abusive or manipulative crap with kids would run into legal problems.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            To my knowledge CA has the most restrictive rules on ex-gay therapy. I think there's a pretty big difference between putting a 12 year old and a 17 year old in therapy, and I think there's a big difference between a good therapist who will support a kid's mental health and help them work through complicated decisions, and the charlatans that make up the bulk of the ex-gay movement. There's a video on youtube of a practitioner of bio-energetics beating a pillow with a tennis racket screaming "MOM WHY DID YOU DO THIS TO ME" as an example of what passes for ex-gay therapy.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              ...wow. They don't do electroshock anymore, do they?

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                I haven't read anything about electroshock or aversion therapy being used currently. My experience was relatively mundane. I was given a book of case studies of miserable people who'd come to be cured by my doctor and there was lots of talk therapy. Being a pretty analytical kid I read the case studies who were all men who came of age in the '70s and ended up doing drugs and/or getting HIV and realized that they were unhappy because of familial rejection and abuse and their life choices, and not inherently because of their sexual orientation.

                The worst I've heard about are programs that involve a lot of isolation, or where the practitioners get into some very shady intimacy issues.

                1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                  At the other extreme:

                  "Like many others, David was taken in the night without warning by a "transport service" and was never told where he was going or when he would be brought back home. While at Escuela Caribe, David had no way of communicating with any of his friends or family back home until the filmmakers arrived and he decided to ask them if they would smuggle out a letter that he had secretly written to his best friend. Once word got back to David's community about what had happened to him, many people sprung to action and formed a plan to get him released. Getting David out of this school, however, turned out to be a much more difficult task than anyone had thought, and the trials they went through to get David released revealed just how far Escuela Caribe would go to prevent a student from leaving."

                  1. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                    Damn it, SF'd the link:

                    http://boingboing.net/2012/02/.....ument.html

                2. A Secret Band of Robbers   12 years ago

                  The problem with any therapy for kids is that some, like ungaying, is horrifically damaging and probably should be illegal, but I can't come up with any viable way for the state to distinguish between those and any other therapy approaches.

                  You can't judge by results since most therapy doesn't actually work. Judging by goals sounds like undue interference in parenting. Method would be ideal, but I sincerely doubt that legislators are going to make themselves knowledgeable about therapy to make good decisions.

                  The real danger with ungaying programs is that eventually, it's likely that someone will come up a way to do it that's not just pseudoscience. Even if it has a hardware component, there's probably a software fix down the line eventually. Right now, we have only the roughest tools, akin to when all psychiatry was lobotomizing, but at some point, we'll be able to ungay or unstraight or make everyone bi for maximum empathy. (Although I suspect the scientific understanding of human sexuality is decades away from such a discovery.) When sexuality becomes truly voluntary, that's when the trouble will begin.

                  As we all know from reading Astonishing X-Men, a cure that could help the worst case scenarios is going to make everything harder for everyone else, ESPECIALLY when there's potential for the cure to become mandatory, or default.

                  And as pointed out, the lag between puberty and legal adulthood is extremely problematic. I have no idea of where to start with that.

                  1. A Secret Band of Robbers   12 years ago

                    The TL;DR is that Gay Genosha has an INCREDIBLE club scene.

                  2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                    I've definitely heard the view expressed that it might be best not to find a purely biological cause for same sex attraction lest we be eugenics'd out of existence.

                  3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

                    Again, it becomes much easier if you assume the kid owns themself rather than that the parent owns them. Does this KID want to go to ex-gay therapy? If yes, then it's okay. If not, than it's abuse.

                    Getting sent to a labor camp against your will is no less a violation of your liberty if a parent does it than it is if a judge does it.

            2. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

              I think there's a big difference between a good therapist who will support a kid's mental health and help them work through complicated decisions, and the charlatans that make up the bulk of the ex-gay movement therapy community.

              FTFY. As the lucky recipient of a number of different types of behavior therapies as a teenager, I can assure you that this is not limited to ungay therapy.

            3. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

              See, this is where the question of whether children are considered property of their parents becomes important.

              Does the parent have the right to force a nonconsenting child to undergo something like ex-gay conversion therapy? The line is going to be very different in the "property" case than otherwise.

              1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                We might as well cut straight to the foreskin...I mean, chase...

                1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                  Hey Nicole, I gave you plenty of opportunity to go off on that earlier when we were talking about Harry Potter.

                  1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                    Damn, where was that?

                    To be clear, I actually hate talking about it. I think it's completely motherfucking pointless.

                    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                      http://reason.com/blog/2013/03.....nt_3626842

                    2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                      Jesus, you even signal me and I miss it because I am obsessed only with Q. I am the worst.

                    3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                      I know! It's ok, I'll forgive you this time, 'cause I'm a mensch like that.

              2. SIV   12 years ago

                No more (or less) right than they have to force the child into "substance abuse therapy" or military school.

              3. Homple   12 years ago

                "Does the parent have the right to force a nonconsenting child to undergo something like ex-gay conversion therapy?"

                Or doing his homework, or cleaning his room, or mowing the lawn, or getting a smallpox vaccination, or not smoking crack...?

          2. Virginian   12 years ago

            The molestation thing isn't just for gay conversion therapists.

            Pretty much every social worker who works with kids is looking for molestation. Luckily for them, if you get a young enough kid, you can convince him over several rigorous sessions that he was molested. Even to the point of giving him false memories of the experience.

            1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

              Yup. That happened quite often in the 80s and prompted a number of high-profile bogus child molestation cases.

            2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

              I agree with you on that. I think the important distinction is that ex-gay therapy is very frequently predicated on the idea that all gays were molested as children, rather than children being molested is common in troubled children and has to be watched out for (often times to the excess of generating false memories).

              1. Virginian   12 years ago

                Yeah I have a real hatred of the whole industry, because I think that they work to perpetuate problems instead of solving them.

                1. Sevo   12 years ago

                  Virginian| 3.22.13 @ 5:40PM |#
                  "Yeah I have a real hatred of the whole industry, because I think that they work to perpetuate problems instead of solving them."

                  It'd help their case if they could point to one objective study that showed they accomplish anything other than separating people from their money.

                  1. Virginian   12 years ago

                    They have a lot in common with the public school system that way. No matter how much funding they get, they're always helpless in the face of the problems these kids have.

                    1. A Secret Band of Robbers   12 years ago

                      At least the public schools don't ruin lives by getting innocent people thrown in jail for child molestation.

                    2. Virginian   12 years ago

                      Uh, a lot of these false molestation cases start with the school counselor.

                    3. A Secret Band of Robbers   12 years ago

                      I wrote that hoping that no one would respond and I could discover a non-evil thing about public schools.

                      Thanks, asshole.

                    4. sloopyinca   12 years ago

                      Hey, if it's any consolation a lot of real molestation cases start with the school counselor.

                    5. A Secret Band of Robbers   12 years ago

                      In high school, a substitute teacher started hitting on my friend, and she told me about it when he started pressuring her for sex. I got her to tell her host parents, they told the school, and the school took swift action and transferred him to a different school district that same week.

                      They take that kind of thing very seriously, don't you know.

        2. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_yjuTaRGx4

      2. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

        Your comment is a hate crime.

      3. generic Brand   12 years ago

        Also: Isn't it equally asinine to think that "born gay" is a universally descriptive rationale for homosexuality?

        I too have had problems coming to term with the "born gay" rationale. If mammals are hardwired to procreate and reproduce, it would seem as if there was something "off" by someone who did not have that desire.

        A possible alternative is that we are all hardwired to be both heterosexual and homosexual, but you would think there'd be a lot more bisexuals coming out of the woodworks than just out and out homosexuals.

        I think categorizing it as a choice isn't a bad thing.

        1. Coeus   12 years ago

          A possible alternative is that we are all hardwired to be both heterosexual and homosexual, but you would think there'd be a lot more bisexuals coming out of the woodworks than just out and out homosexuals.

          I believe that to be the case. It's all determined by societal standards and training. Look at ancient Greece.

          1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            That seems like a possibility to me, as well. Homosexuality in antiquity was often a strongly liminal and/or fraternal state, even if one removes the pederast relationships from the discussion. That is still the case in certain less-developed regions of the world.

        2. Rhywun   12 years ago

          If mammals are hardwired to procreate and reproduce, it would seem as if there was something "off" by someone who did not have that desire.

          I have no trouble with that notion. As someone with that very affliction, it became obvious at a pretty young age that I was not "normal". The problem is when people equate "not normal" with "wrong".

        3. Trespassers W   12 years ago

          I too have had problems coming to term with the "born gay" rationale. If mammals are hardwired to procreate and reproduce, it would seem as if there was something "off" by someone who did not have that desire.

          Last I checked, the best hypothesis was that the same gene that caused (or made more probable) homosexuality in men increased fertility in women. The gene doesn't "care" if a particular copy of it is embodied in a reproductive dead end, so long as other copies are being created at a higher rate elsewhere.

          Personally, I don't have a horse in this race. It's a scientific question. The ethical implications are the same to me whatever the answer.

          1. Pi Guy   12 years ago

            Who care if gays choose to be gay? I'm pro-choice. On abortion. On guns. On whose doo-dads you like to touch.

  2. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Obama has promised Jordan $200 million in aid, which I'm sure is easy to explain to the kids who couldn't go on tours of the White House.

    Or any of the other people allegedly being screwed by the sequester. This is red meat for GOP pols like Rand.

    1. robc   12 years ago

      Jordan needs aid? Isnt Hanes paying him enough?

      1. GW   12 years ago

        Nike isn't making as cool a Jordans as they used to, and I think it's hitting 'ol number 23's pockets hard.

        The economy IS in the shitter you know.

      2. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

        That's the least they have to pay him not to talk to the press after playing supersecret, no-media/cameras allowed golf with Obama.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has apologized to the Turkish prime minister for the 2010 raid on a Gaza-bound flotilla that left several Turkish nationals dead.

    SEE, TURKEY? THAT'S HOW YOU APOLOGIZE FOR LEAVING DEAD.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      SEE, TURKEY? THAT'S HOW YOU APOLOGIZE FOR LEAVING DEAD.

      Yeah, but the Kardashians.

      1. Hollywood   12 years ago

        What difference at this point DOES IT MAKE?

  4. SweatingGin   12 years ago

    Which one of you was this with the artisan mayo shop?

  5. rts   12 years ago

    What a cool way to die

    The van had sped down a BC Ferries dock, crashed through a chain link fence, sped across a tied-up ferry and launched off the other end into the ocean, before sinking at about 3:45 a.m. PT on Wednesday.

    1. Joe M   12 years ago

      Sounds almost exactly like what happened to the MacKenzie Brothers in Strange Brew. Except they survived, of course.

      1. Specail Sauce   12 years ago

        My brother and I used to say that drownin' in beer was like heaven, eh?

        Now he's not here, and I've got two soakers... this isn't heaven. This sucks!

        1. Joe M   12 years ago

          Did you know that movie was loosely based on the plot of Hamlet?

          1. Restoras   12 years ago

            Operative word there is loosely, eh?

            1. Joe M   12 years ago

              Just call them Rosencrantz and Guildenstern MacKenzie.

      2. Pi Guy   12 years ago

        To drink Molson or not to drink Molson. That is the question.

        1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

          not Molson.
          never.

          1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

            Sleeman's?

            1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

              Keith's or Kokanee

              1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                I will bear this in mind next time I cross into the Great White North.

                1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

                  or a microbrew

                  1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

                    not mentioned: Half Pints in Manitoba.

                2. Joe M   12 years ago

                  Victoria, BC has an awesome, thriving microbrew culture.

              2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

                Bor?ale, you bitchez. I mean at least if we're looking for something at that price point.

                Fuck Keith's. (It's actually decent, but I hate IPAs. I know.)

                1. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

                  Keith's may not really be an IPA.

        2. sloopyinca   12 years ago

          Get thee to a nunnery brewery: why wouldst thou be a breeder of sinners hosers?

  6. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

    New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has confirmed that he is against gay conversion therapy.

    It makes sense. If you can change your ways, maybe you really aren't predestined to BE anything. As a Statist, Christie obviously fears the whole "choice" thingy.

  7. $park?   12 years ago

    Speaking of weddings.

    Number 21 is ... uh ... well, you'll see.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Screw that. The second photo with the guns and glasses looks badass.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        The cat one is amazing too.

        But the first one in 23 is the best yet.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          28 can't be real. It's too perfect.

        2. $park?   12 years ago

          But the first one in 23 is the best yet.

          The lucky groom probably got fucked silly by all of them.

          1. hamilton   12 years ago

            At once, if the picture is any indication.

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              What would you do if you had a million dollars?

              1. Bardas Phocas   12 years ago

                I think 32 is a re-enactment of that meth ad.

                "Marrying a ginger isn't normal, unless you're on meth."

      2. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

        That is pretty bad ass. My wife did a wedding shoot for some friends who were hunters. She took a shot of all the groomsmen pointing their shotguns at the camera. It was totally badass.

    2. SweatingGin   12 years ago

      That really escalated

  8. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    In other news on sensible spending, the Pentagon wants $49 million for a new prison at Guant?namo Bay for "special" detainees.

    Special? Like, they're going to have finger painting special? Or special as in domestic, anti-government militia terrorist special.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      "There's other projects that I couldn't talk about here in the open but do have to do with replacing one of the camp facilities where some of the detainees are ? special detainees are housed. We could get into that offline if you want."

      How transparent!

    2. DJF   12 years ago

      This can't be right, Obama promised to close the prison in Guantanamo.

      1. SweatingGin   12 years ago

        He's definitely going to close it. Maybe expand it a bit first, but then, first day in office, definitely going to close it.

        1. Rich   12 years ago

          It's like fixing up the house to sell it.

    3. Hugh Akston   12 years ago

      Why is the government taking retards prisoner anyway? Are they taken to Guantanamo on a short helicopter? Are they issued a combination prayer rug/nap mat? Who takes them to the bathroom when they have to go boom-boom?

  9. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Meanwhile, in Russia

    1. Loki   12 years ago

      They must have watched the Top Gear USA taxi challenge episode.

  10. h3k86qc35923   12 years ago

    The Republican governor's announcement came one day after he said he didn't know enough about the issue to comment ? and hours after ... the Democratic Governors Association, calling Christie "extremist," used it as a way to raise money.

    A politician who doesn't know enough about an issue is the exact opposite of an extremist.

    1. Loki   12 years ago

      "He didn't say what we wanted to hear, and he's a member of the wrong TEAM, therefore - EXTREMIST!!!!"

  11. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    France's highest court and an advisory council have both dismissed the 75 percent income tax on the wealthy.

    Sounds like the highest court and advisory council are in a top bracket.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas.) tried to repeal ObamaCare on its third birthday.

    No big tax ever gets repealed. He should know that.

    1. C. Anacreon   12 years ago

      Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas.) tried to repeal ObamaCare on his third birthday.

      At least that's how I read it at first, and thought what a precocious little bugger, working against healthcare reform as a toddler!

  13. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Infant shot in the head while in stroller, underage killers shot and taunted mother before fleeing.

    I can't think of a punishment that would fit the crime here.

    1. Rich   12 years ago

      nvestigators were checking school attendance records for leads.

      That oughta narrow it down.

      "Understand this: There is no clear motive right now," he said.

      Yep.

      Seriously, I'm seeing a use for that new Gitmo prison.

    2. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

      Put the kids in the same cell as Jerry Sandusky?

    3. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

      Something along the lines of what the English did to William Wallace maybe. But I'm still coming up short.

    4. Restoras   12 years ago

      How on earth could this happen? I mean, how can an underage person legally purchase a gun? Something has to be done about this.

    5. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

      yeah, i'm going home now.

    6. SIV   12 years ago

      I can't think of a punishment that would fit the crime here.

      Summary extra-judicial hanging from the nearest tree seems appropriate.

    7. JW   12 years ago

      I can't think of a punishment that would fit the crime here.

      Whatever it is, it should be extremely painful and take several months to complete.

      1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        SCAPHISM! but it only takes a few days.

        1. SIV   12 years ago

          Cruel? I suppose that is a matter of opinion.
          Unusual? Not in ancient Persia!

    8. Loki   12 years ago

      I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    9. RBS   12 years ago

      I saw this earlier, so fucked up. I'm with SIV though, hang em.

    10. Chris Mallory   12 years ago

      No need to be cruel, but I would be in favor of locking both kids and their parents in a room and slowly replacing the oxygen in the room with helium.

  14. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    NATO has decided that the loosely-defined "hacker" can be considered a battlefield target and can be attacked if his actions cause death or "significant property damage."

    Link: http://thehill.com/blogs/defco.....to-report-

    I like the loose definitions they use. Pretty much means they can now kill anybody that ever tried to log on to a government server and label them a "hacker".

    1. Bam!   12 years ago

      So Iran would be justified in killing the guys who created Stuxnet?

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        Well, no! NATO are the good guys and Iran are the bad guys by definition. Therefore, if they follow our protocols, they are committing acts of aggression against us. When we follow those protocols, it's called "defense".

        Haven't you gotten your most current edition of the NEWSPEAK Dictionary yet?

  15. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Men's low standards: a cunning trick of the patriarchy!

    Inevitably during the rounds of the housework wars, there's a man who finds the neat solution that puts all blame where a sexist culture believes it completely belongs, on women. Feminists point out that women's duties at home are cutting into either their work time or their free time or usually both, and if men did more work around the house, this would help.

    Housework is coded as women's work, and so it has a Someone Else's Problem field generator around it for men. Women can either point out the housework that a man needs to do and be a nag or do it themselves and give up their free time.

    I sense that Amanduh's little talks with her boy-toy about the housework haven't been going too well...

    1. h3k86qc35923   12 years ago

      How do women's duties at home cut into work time? Aren't those one and the same?

    2. Joe M   12 years ago

      Funny that she makes a Douglas Adams reference. I would've thought hoopy froods were tools of the patriarchy.

      1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

        But the Point of View Gun is useless on women.

        1. Joe M   12 years ago

          That's not canon!

          1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

            Apparently that is an idea that Adams came up with for the movie before he died.

        2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          That or the Total Perspective Vortex.

          Non-canon bastard.

      2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        Bitch needs to find her towel.

        1. Restoras   12 years ago

          And iron my shirts. I have an important meeting on Monday.

          1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

            Around here the accepted phrase is "Iron my shit!'

    3. $park?   12 years ago

      You know, I always try to read these articles when you people post them. I really do. But I can never get past the first paragraph without getting the urge to punch something.

      1. RBS   12 years ago

        I know. Plus, I do 90% of our housework and still have plenty of free time. Probably because I get my ass out of bed on saturday morning, clean the fucking house, shower and then enjoy the rest of the day, oh yeah I also take care of an 8 month old. Seriously, it's so easy and even if you have a bigger house just do all the rooms on a rotation. I have zero sympathy for these whiners.

        1. Corey S.   12 years ago

          "In my experience, it's really not?most men actually do like having a clean home as much as women do, or else hotels wouldn't have daily maid service and the military would be unable to maintain its rigid cleanliness standards."

          If this is the gold standard of feminist analysis, they're in trouble. Hotels are clean because no one wants to stay in a hotel room covered in someone else's mess. And there might just be some other explanation for the military's cleanliness standards.

          I live alone. My apartment is never "clean." I find better things to do with my time than keeping my apartment 100% clean. I suspect this is the case for most men, and they have to adjust their expectations when living with others (roommates/girlfriends/wives etc). Why is this so hard for her to understand?

          1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

            Hotels are clean because no one wants to stay in a hotel room covered in someone else's mess.

            They also get cleaned every day while the same party is staying in the room, unless you indicate otherwise, so that's not the only reason.

            1. Corey S.   12 years ago

              True. But I imagine that if hotels charged for maid service, the percentage of men who would pay for it would be lower than the percentage of women who would.

              Also, am I the only one who doesn't like having his room cleaned every day when I stay at a hotel? Every third day is about right for me.

              1. SIV   12 years ago

                I'm in hotels all the time. I expect daily maid service. I assume it is women whoo fall for the "green" scam where they don't wash your towels or change the bed linen...for the environment!

  16. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    Deer escapes from trunk

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Rule #2: Double Tap.

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        Ummm...Rule #1 would be...

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          Cardio.

        2. BladeDoc   12 years ago

          Rules of Gunfights:
          1. Always have a gun
          2. Anything worth shooting once . . . is worth shooting twice

  17. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Ohio prosecutors have a macabre sense of humor, wants Punxsutawney Phil indicted and put to death for bad weather forecasting.

    Well he did predict an early spring and how's that been?

    1. Xenocles   12 years ago

      Speaking of bad weathermen, here's an oldie.

    2. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

      I thought winter is coming was just a tagline for Game of Thrones. I didn't think it was an actual prophecy.

  18. A Serious Man   12 years ago

    Canada ruins everything: Canadian volcanoes killed the dinosaurs.

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      Come up with something more believable, Canada has never literally killed something.

      1. hamilton   12 years ago

        except football.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          They more created a mutated clone of it.

        2. Generic Stranger   12 years ago

          And music.

      2. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

        Not fair, even though it has been almost a century.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vimy_Ridge

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          The Germans didn't die there, they just ran away from the horrible sound of Bieber.

  19. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Steubenville Makes Rape Culture Harder To Deny

    Formally, our society condemns rape. We pass laws banning it and occasionally, we even enforce those laws. It's insulting as fuck to call someone a rapist, so much so that even when we have irrefutable proof that someone is a rapist, it's hard to get people to form their mouths around the word. (But of course, the unwillingness to accept the reality of rape in this way is ultimately evidence for the existence of rape culture.) It's easy to imagine that our society is just against rape and that's all there is to it. Follow that line of logic far enough, and you're forced to conclude that rapists rape not because they feel empowered to do so, but because of some kind of biological drive that is untouchable by social pressure.

    "I'm not actually going to define rape culture or prove that it exists; in fact, I'll go ahead and give you a whole bunch of reasons to think it doesn't exist. Just trust me on this one, rape culture is totally a thing -- and if you don't agree, you're a rape culture apologist."

    1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

      Extra crazy bonus from the comments:

      It's the patriarchal system socially in confluence with the capitalist system economically and politically. This is to my way of thinking why the paper of record The New York Times on most days (except Sunday and Monday when Sports has its own section) has sports news in the business section! In other words, the cult of masculinity is an adjunct of the patriarchy and capitalism. And of course all of this is modeled in a direct way on religion--the dominance of god--which is why the European and soon to be international women's group Femen is concerned with destroying religion and making it illegal--they get it!

      1. Banjos   12 years ago

        "OK, here's what we've got: the Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people, under the supervision of the reverse vampires, are forcing our parents to go to bed early in a fiendish plot to eliminate the meal of dinner. We're through the looking glass, here, people..."

      2. Marshall Gill   12 years ago

        Ouch! That hurt my brain and lowered my IQ!

      3. Loki   12 years ago

        Wow... Her parents must be so proud of their precious snowflake's $100,000 B.A. in Gender Studies.

      4. AuH20   12 years ago

        Does someone even try to point out the sheer amount of money that sports generate for the television and radio industries, let alone clothing, advertising, etc.?

        1. Killazontherun   12 years ago

          That would be . . . something to do with the oppression of women . . . sexist, yeah, somehow sexist to point that out. God, I hate feminist. Of all the collectivist in Dipshitville the dumbest fuckers of all.

    2. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      . Follow that line of logic far enough, and you're forced to conclude that rapists rape not because they feel empowered to do so, but because of some kind of biological drive that is untouchable by social pressure.

      Maybe rapists are just fucked up mentally? Or do they not accept that view for murderers. Do we have "murder culture" in this country?

      1. Restoras   12 years ago

        Do we have "murder culture" in this country?

        Go ask. I double-dog dare you.

        1. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

          What do you think they mean when they say "gun culture"

        2. Pi Guy   12 years ago

          IF only we had a Freedom Culture. That would be the shit.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        What, you've never heard of the 2nd Am and our out-of-control gun culture?

        Obviously, there would be no murder if not for those things, we are all just eminently perfectible blank slates, etc.

        1. Dr. Frankenstein   12 years ago

          Or what he said.

      3. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        "Do we have "murder culture" in this country?"

        Based on the Balko stuff I've read over the years, I'm gonna say yes.

    3. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      I refuse to believe in Rape Culture until someone shows me the museums full of Rape Art, the orchestras that have Rape Opera as part of their repertoire, the cities full of Rape Architecture, and the restaurants that serve Rape Cuisine.

      1. hamilton   12 years ago

        Well, Olive Garden. QE frickin' D.

        1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Damn your quick fingers.

        2. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

          Ugh. You're right.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

        restaurants that serve Rape Cuisine

        In fairness, the existence of the KFC Double Down is strong proof in favor of that small point.

        1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

          I fully consented to the sex that that sandwich had with my taste buds.

          1. Ska   12 years ago

            This reads like a line from Futurama.

            1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

              I did do the nasty in the pasty.

          2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            "The way the bacon was just hanging out of the sandwich, it was practically begging for it!"

        2. H. ReardEn   12 years ago

          Which is why Rape Cuisine is considered the apex of culinary development.

      3. AuH20   12 years ago

        Rape Opera

        Where do you want me to start?

    4. Xenocles   12 years ago

      Except I guarantee that her standard of "irrefutable proof" is "the woman said so."

    5. itsnotmeitsyou   12 years ago

      Yay! I get to use this video twice today!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtNHuqHWefU

    6. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

      "What those boys did? It wasn't rape-rape. It was something else, but I don't believe it was rape-rape."

      /Whoopi

  20. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    I'm sorry to do this on a Friday afternoon, but I'm gonna go ahead and ruin everybody's fucking day. I guess it's nice that they're letting the civil case go forward, but the facts of this case are quite disturbing.

    FTA: Officers Daniel Fry and Sean McCormick said in depositions that Boucher left the convenience store at their request after the clerk complained about him. When McCormick approached Boucher from behind and put a hand on his shoulder, they said that Boucher clenched his fists and began screaming.

    That's when Fry shocked Boucher in the back, causing him to fall hard, face-first into the pavement, landing with his hands underneath him and out of the officers' view, according to the depositions.

    Fry said he got one handcuff on Boucher's wrist before he spun around and punched the officer in the head twice. A wrestling match ensued before McCormick yelled for Fry to move and shocked Boucher in the chest with his stun gun, causing him to fall to his knees.

    The officers said Boucher then spotted the clerk outside, got up and ran toward her.

    (cont.)

    1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      (cont.)

      Although Boucher wasn't moving, McCormick testified he kicked him and hit him with his baton, and ordered Fry to stun him twice more. Although Fry testified he only remembered stunning Boucher three times, information downloaded from the device showed he used it six times in a 75-second span.

      A third officer, Bradley Walker, testified that when he arrived at the scene, he saw McCormick hit a motionless Boucher with the baton about five times and saw Fry use his stun gun on him.

      The officers handcuffed Boucher, patted him down and turned him over, only to find that he wasn't breathing and his face was covered in blood. Boucher was dead minutes later despite attempts to revive him.
      -and-
      Neither officer was disciplined and the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation cleared both of wrongdoing.

      So, they ask him to leave and he does. An officer then decides to assault him in the parking lot by putting his hands on him for no fucking reason and then they completely lose it and beat/taze the guy to death.

      I fucking swear. I hope these murderous pigs die a painful death.

      1. Joe M   12 years ago

        Fluffy bunnies, chirping birds, the smell of fresh flowers, a trickling stream...

      2. Juice   12 years ago

        Any relation to Bobby Boucher?

      3. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

        I'm sorry to do this on a Friday afternoon

        Can we just be real for a moment and admit you love doing this on a Friday afternoon?

        1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

          Honestly, I don't. I feel compelled to relay this kind of stuff though.

          Maybe I should have become a reporter/investigative journalist...like Balko but with hair on the sides and back of my head.

          1. Pi Guy   12 years ago

            We should all be relaying this kind of stuff.

  21. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    the Pentagon wants $49 million for a new prison at Guant?namo Bay for "special" detainees.

    That's a lotta cake.

  22. MJGreen   12 years ago

    Cato Unbound update: Nicole Hassoun continues flailing around, starting her most recent response with a summary that looks as if she's been following an entirely different debate. Michael Huemer, meanwhile, has further convinced me that he invades my brain while I'm asleep. He says most everything I want to say, with all the caveats included.

    1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      Oh fun. I'm going to go check it out. Thanks!

    2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      God, she is just awful. Her like entire shtick is, "Duh, everyone knows there are positive rights and that's why most people aren't anarchists." And...that's all.

      1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

        As you read her arguments, remember, this is a woman who received her Ph.D in an Philosophy department at an American university, and supposedly should have a deep grounding in the methodologies of Analytic Philosophy.

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          So, although I am tempted to use this forum to talk about the causes of poverty and what I think we can do about it, I will refrain.

          She spent maybe like five sentences total not talking about poverty. What the fuck.

          1. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            "Imma let you finish thinking about the causes of poverty, but government has the truest consent of all time!"

        2. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

          She had arguments?

      2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

        The proper way to choose a political system is to run a regression that tries to hold all factors except for regime type constant?not to look at examples?not to give theoretical arguments.

        ...

        If legitimacy does come in degrees and if consent would justify an agent in having a monopoly on the use of coercive force within a territory, I think Huemer also needs a reason to reject my new argument against libertarianism. I claim that the ability to consent is necessary for consent. So those exercising coercion (states in the actual world) will have to ensure that people can secure what they need to consent (even if this requires coercion) to be legitimate. On consent theory, ensuring that people can secure what they need to consent may be illegitimate if doing so requires coercing those who have not yet consented to the coercer's rules, but coercers may be more legitimate if they do secure this consent than if they do not.

        Sure, making consent and coercion into some kind of infinite feedback loop totally solves the problem of consent. WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN I just can't even.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

          What it means is that when the State hits Prof. Hassoun, it's just because it loves her. Bitch shoulda known the State doesn't like cold mashed potatoes with its pot roast.

          1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

            Pretty much.

        2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Word jambalaya! For when you just have to meet that 1500-word article requirement.

        3. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          Also, I realize that she was supposed to respond to the essay and not the book, but this whole "consent theory" bullshit is so absurd in the context of the book. "I claim that the ability to consent is necessary for consent." Yeah, so does Huemer. And one of his necessary conditions for consent is the meaningful ability not to consent. So you might as well stop writing now, Prof. Hassoun, the rest of your argument is completely fucking irrelevant.

        4. MJGreen   12 years ago

          Fucking philosophy. You get to talk endlessly about subjects that will never be resolved. What does it mean to attain consent or be "more legitimate"? Whatever the hell you want it to mean! And if you define it differently, we get to write papers refuting each other until our last day on this planet.

          Consent = written or verbal agreement to undertake the obligations of a contract is nice and logical, but unfortunately leaves little room for intellectual sparring.

          1. deified   12 years ago

            And if you define it differently, we get to write papers refuting each other until our last day on this planet.

            MJGreen-- can you think of a better way to pay for your mortgage and take your sabbatical year in Heidelberg?

            In that case, I'm going to ask you STFU.

        5. deified   12 years ago

          For the record, I love it when Nicole just can't even and i have been lobbying hard for the return of this nickname.

          /awful person

      3. MJGreen   12 years ago

        And she simply has no response to Caplan's obvious point that, according to her own argument, she has a moral obligation to give all her money to the poor. While Caplan can sometimes misuse the reductio ad absurdum, he's so clearly correct here, given the language she used. It's hilarious.

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          Oh, I know. And she's just like, "nuh uh!" Seriously, that's her response. "He said this entails that, and I say it doesn't." Well fuckin' a, in that case...

          1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

            Well, it seems to me that after "nuh uh," she implies that if the government took away her money, and others', to give to those poor people then that would be OK, even if she has no unilateral obligation to do so.

            1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

              Inside the mind of a statist...

              1. Pi Guy   12 years ago

                Statists gonna state.

        2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

          Reductio ad absurdum isn't a formal logical fallacy, and works well in the context of abstract discussion. It is used quite often in mathematical proofs, actually -- it's associated with proof by contradiction.

  23. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

    "Just like you can't run into a theater and yell 'fire' when it's not on fire, you can't run into a crowded bingo hall and yell 'bingo' when there isn't one," said Park Hills Police Sgt. Richard Webster, the officer who cited Whaley.

    http://nky.cincinnati.com/arti.....e?gcheck=1

    1. Xenocles   12 years ago

      At least he remembered the "false" part of the Holmes meme.

  24. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    only to find that he wasn't breathing and his face was covered in blood.

    Dominance was established.

    Blood flowed.

    Respiration ceased.

    Homes were returned to.

  25. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Kelly Thomas Part II.

    I guess it's not worthy of more attention because he had a load of meth in his system when the cops beat tazed and sat on him until he died.

    1. h3k86qc35923   12 years ago

      Maybe it was their meth.

  26. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

    Pravda headline: "Venezuela's President Hugo Ch?vez: a cult figure"

    When even the Soviets' favorite rag is saying it...

  27. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    Hey, maybe being a part of the thick blue wall of silence might actually be punished.

    FTA: Public complaints about troopers usually go through a series of internal reviews, but that didn't happen in the case of Chris Hughes, he said. The former Biloxi-area trooper pleaded guilty recently to depriving the woman of her civil rights.

    The DPS chief said he doesn't know what the FBI has or will learn, but agents surely are looking at who knew about the Hughes incidents and what actions they took about them.

    A recently filed federal civil lawsuit against Hughes and three unidentified officers claims to document seven incidents in which Hughes beat or otherwise mistreated motorists he stopped on north Mississippi roadways from 2007 through July 16, 2012.

    This is what can happen when you're more concerned with covering up criminal activities of your co-workers than upholding the law. Not very often, but it can happen.

    1. SIV   12 years ago

      former Biloxi-area trooper

      Hughes beat or otherwise mistreated motorists he stopped on north Mississippi roadways

      If he was "Biloxi-area" what was he doing patrolling North Misissippi roads?
      That is one hell of a commute.

      1. Enough About Palin   12 years ago

        ^^THIS^^

        1. SIV   12 years ago

          The article is from the Tallahassee Democrat. That is the newspaper that inspired a very popular bumper sticker "Don't Ask Me, I Read the Democrat"

  28. Juice   12 years ago

    If the US instituted a 75% tax bracket the courts could do nothing about it. I don't understand how the French courts struck theirs down.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   12 years ago

      I don't understand how the French courts struck theirs down.

      I'm guessing it's the difference of the role of the courts between a common law system and a civil law system.

    2. Stormy Dragon   12 years ago

      IfWhen the US instituted a 75% tax bracket the courts could dodid nothing about it

      FTFY

  29. Tony   12 years ago

    Yes, sometimes children need to be protected from their parents.

    If there were no children, I might even be a libertarian. But there are, and you can't really justify libertarianism in a world with children. At least not the lowbrow Ayn Rand version most people here buy into. It's no accident her novels don't contain children.

    1. Virginian   12 years ago

      Derp derp derp.

      Ever been inside the foster care system?

    2. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: Tony,

      Yes, sometimes children need to be protected from their parents.

      Only if the parents are committing acts of aggression against their children, not just because they want them to receive a non-secular education or refuse to give them Ritalin.

      If there were no children, I might even be a libertarian.

      I am a libertarian precisely for the children. The state is the biggest murderer and enslaver of children there has even been.

      1. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

        If we're using standard definitions, I've aggressed against my children countless times.

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          Where to people get this idea that children are always completely passive?

        2. Xenocles   12 years ago

          That's precisely why standard definitions don't apply to children. They aren't chattels, but they sure as hell are not the same morally as adults. There are at least a few stages in between that children pass through - I can't quantify it, but they're there.

    3. DRM   12 years ago

      It's no accident her novels don't contain children.

      . . . with the exceptions of We the Living, The Fountainhead, and Atlas Shrugged.

      Which is to say, each and every one of her novels did contain children, nitwit.

  30. cw   12 years ago

    So, Reasonoids, I have a couple updates (not that you bastards care, but here goes):

    My child is a boy, and I was accepted into law school.

    That is all.

    1. Jordan   12 years ago

      My child is a boy

      Congratulations!

      I was accepted into law school

      May god have mercy on your soul.

      1. MJGreen   12 years ago

        This basically constitutes child abuse, right?

      2. cw   12 years ago

        May god have mercy on your soul.

        Yeah, yeah, yeah...

        1. Corey S.   12 years ago

          I say this as a recent graduate with a mountain of debt. Don't go to law school unless 1) you are absolutely committed to being a lawyer, 2) going for free or cheap and 3) you have a reasonable probably of getting a good job when you graduate. Trust me.

          1. cw   12 years ago

            Perhaps unbelievably, I meet all three of your criteria. I'm sorry about your debt; I am aware of the risks in going to law school.

            1. Corey S.   12 years ago

              (I apologize if this gets posted a bunch of times)

              First, congrats on the baby, exciting stuff.

              Second, good for you for being smart about law school. I wasn't and many of my friends weren't either. I was fortunate to get a great job and I will be fine. Many of my classmates at a pretty good school aren't. It sounds like you got a great plan. Best of luck. Are you planning on trying to work for PLF or IJ, by any chance? I did a summer at IJ, it was awesome.

              Also, enjoy that first year.

              1. cw   12 years ago

                Yes, I am very interested in IJ, and that's awesome you got to work for them. But I could give Pacific Legal a look, too.

                Thanks for the response!

      3. R C Dean   12 years ago

        Two words:

        In. House.

      4. Mickey Rat   12 years ago

        "May god have mercy on your soul."

        Don't worry too much about that. His soul will be surgically removed by the time he graduates.

    2. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      Congratulations!

      1. Virginian   12 years ago

        She's going to want pictures now. It's the nature of her sex.

        Send me my fucking cigar pops. I prefer something smooth, but with a complex thread. Don't skimp. Real libertarians find a way to get those Cuban virgin thigh rolled ones.

        1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

          Nah, I only care about pictures of babies whose naming rights I buy.

          1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            ZIIIIIING!!!!

            1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

              I mean, not that she isn't also the motherfucking cutest, sloopy.

              1. Virginian   12 years ago

                Well played.

              2. Banjos   12 years ago

                Damn Straight!

                1. Virginian   12 years ago

                  Squueeeee

                  I mean uh....*manly grunt* real uh...cute kid you got there. I'm gonna go....if you need me, I'm gonna be in the garage...[in a deeper voice] hangin' Sheetrock, 'round an engine I'm rebuilding.

                2. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

                  Aww, that is a really cute kid.

                3. JW   12 years ago

                  Very cute! She looks like her father.

                  Does Ken know about him yet?

                4. Restoras   12 years ago

                  Very cute. I can also tell from the pic that kid has a bit of the devil inside. Good luck.

    3. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      Is the child new or are you just discovering this?

      Congrats, man!

      1. cw   12 years ago

        Oh I've known since conception. We just found out the sex recently.

        1. RBS   12 years ago

          Congrats, I just had a boy in July. They are a lot of fun. Until they go all zombie on you.

    4. JW   12 years ago

      Congrats on the first and you have my deepest sympathies on the second.

      When's the naming contest?

      1. cw   12 years ago

        He already has a name, but your welcome to submit your proposal. Maybe I can convince the wife to alter it if it's a real zinger.

        1. Warty   12 years ago

          Charles Martel is the perennial suggestion around here, I believe.

          1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

            Just don't steal Lysander Messiah or Lysander Christ. I've got dibs on both.

    5. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

      You had me then you lost me.

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        The baby isn't born yet. I was confused for a minute as well.

        1. cw   12 years ago

          Sorry, bad writing on my part.

    6. DEG   12 years ago

      Congratulations!

  31. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    I've got to give credit where credit is due. Al Gore has gotten so deep into the green movement that he must not have seen a single news story in the past few months. That can be the only explanation for him calling for there to be a carbon tax.

    What a maroon.

  32. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Neither officer was disciplined and the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation cleared both of wrongdoing.

    If somebody went to these pigs' houses, rang the doorbell and shot their balls off with 00 buckshot when they came to the door, and then left their dismembered bodies in a dumpster, would their co-workers look at one another and say, "Well, shit; it's not like they didn't deserve it. It's surprising it took this long."?

    No. They would weep and wail and gnash their teeth and shriek to high heaven about the War on Cops. And use it as an example of why they need ever-increasing levels of militarization for their baboon army of occupation.

    1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      No. They would weep and wail and gnash their teeth and shriek to high heaven about the War on Cops. And use it as an example of why they need ever-increasing levels of militarization for their baboon army of occupation.

      You mean after the state funeral, parade and 21-gun salute with pipers playing in the background, right?

      1. Pi Guy   12 years ago

        Yeah. What is it with the fucking bagpipes? Why do all cops and firefighters think they're freaking Scottish?

        1. jb4479   12 years ago

          After the 1715 rising a lot of Scots were forced from their lands and resettled in Northern Ireland. A large number of their descendants were among the successive waves of Irish immigration. They brought their unique Scots-Irish culture to America. (It's why bluegrass and Celtic music sound a lot alike.)

          The police and Fire departments fo the large cities of the northeast were mostly made up of immigrants, particularly Scots-Irish, especially in Boston and New York City.

  33. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I was accepted into law school.

    Condolences.

    1. Ice Nine   12 years ago

      I don't want to rain on his parade so I'll ask down here. After the well-publicized catastrophic "reception" into their job market that the last couple of law school graduating classes have experienced, why does anyone apply to law school now? Forget new grads, if I'm not mistaken established lawyers and even partners are being laid off from firms in large numbers. Is he going to dabble in law as a hobby or what?

      1. cw   12 years ago

        Lawyers in my state(MT) seem to be doing OK. Mainly I want to do work defending private property from government overreach, in what little way I can.

        1. General Butt Naked   12 years ago

          I'd say spending the $100k on an arsenal would better equip you towards that aim.

        2. Corey S.   12 years ago

          Then I amend my comment above to say: good for you. But do it as cheaply as possible. It sounds obvious, but I wish someone had told me 4 years ago.

  34. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    In other news on sensible spending, the Pentagon wants $49 million for a new prison at Guant?namo Bay for "special" detainees.

    Special = American.

    1. Joe M   12 years ago

      Damn right we're special. Sorry, Canada.

  35. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    after the state funeral, parade and 21-gun salute with pipers playing in the background, right?

    Ya, sure, you betcha by golly. And special guest appearances by Governors, Senators, representatives of Mayors Against Legal Guns, and other suchlike dignitaries. Quite possibly Janet Napolitano himself, hand delivering the keys to a shiny new APC.

  36. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    Cato Unbound update: Nicole Hassoun continues flailing around, starting her most recent response with a summary that looks as if she's been following an entirely different debate.

    I shall be forever grateful that I have no fucking clue what any of that jibberjabber is about. And don't bother trying to explain it.

    *sticks fingers in ears*

    "LALALALALALALALALALALALALALALAI'M NOT LISTENING!"

  37. OldMexican   12 years ago

    France's highest court and an advisory council have both dismissed the 75 percent income tax on the wealthy.

    se reculer!

  38. Barrett70   12 years ago

    my best friend's mom makes $70/hour on the internet. She has been out of a job for 5 months but last month her income was $18311 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on this web site http://www.wow92.com

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      Re: Barrett70,

      my best friend's mom makes $70/hour on the internet.

      "I know - I have paid her top dollar to see her lick her knickers!"

  39. Joe M   12 years ago

    The first seal of the sequestpocalypse has been broken!

    FAA To Close 149 Air Traffic Towers Because Of Budget Cuts

    With a little shout out to our own Robert Poole:

    "There's a tendency over time to have Congress direct more money to small airports than would probably be economically justified," explained Robert Poole, an aviation analyst at the Reason Foundation think tank.

    He said his own initial review of the list released Friday showed that many of the towers that will close around the clock are at airports with few or no scheduled passenger flights, indicating that Friday's decision would likely have little effect on airline service.

    So, I get the impression the sequester just forced the trimming of some of that fabled "waste, fraud, and abuse" we're always hearing so much about.

    1. SFC B   12 years ago

      One of the airports being shuttered is Sugar Land Regional. Although it doesn't do regular passenger service it gets a lot of travel for businesspeople traveling too and from Houston. The city has tried, in the past, to pay for the operation of the tower. but the FAA has refused.

      In addition to cutting off fabled FWA, how much of this is political decisions designed to hurt those people who dare not support The One. Hurting operations at an airport in a very business-friendly, Republican-leaning city seems par for the course at this point.

  40. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    why does anyone apply to law school now?

    I would think the market for in-house "compliance officers" would be booming. It might not ultimately pay off like a partnership, but it seems to me a lot of businesses need a dedicated person to slog through the neck-deep bullshit.

  41. Sevo   12 years ago

    "Off-leash dog runner sues over tasing"
    At least she didn't shoot his dogs...
    http://www.sfgate.com/crime/ar.....374463.php

  42. Coeus   12 years ago

    Krugman gloats that Ireland is not recovering.

    Even with the tortured graph he posts, it looks like it's coming along fine. What am I missing?

    1. Auric Demonocles   12 years ago

      When I was in Ireland everyone there thought the economy was shit and they were doomed to be in debt for a couple generations. No idea how that conforms to reality, but that's what the average Irishmen seemed to think.

    2. Irish   12 years ago

      You're missing that Ireland has the most progressive income tax in the European Union.

      Strange that Krugman leaves that out.

  43. sloopyinca   12 years ago

    What am I missing?

    "Team Blue talking points" would be my guess.

    1. Shine on, Nikki Diamond   12 years ago

      I was going to suggest "Krugman's magic beard," but that works too.

      1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

        I fail to see what Coeus kidnapping Krugman's wife would accomplish.

        1. Irish   12 years ago

          Now stealing Krugman's cats would be a really serious blow. I don't know how Krugdaddy would ever recover.

          1. Irish   12 years ago

            THERE ARE ALWAYS CATS!

          2. The Immaculate Trouser   12 years ago

            Those cats have seen things, Irish. Seen things that would make a grown man tremble.

  44. Archduke Pantsfan   12 years ago

    oh, it said sleep like Royalty

  45. Loki   12 years ago

    4th photo down. Rapefruit. Hi-larious!

    1. sloopyinca   12 years ago

      The ones on Page 2 are better.

  46. DEG   12 years ago

    I decided that after a shitty week I would continue the pain by finishing my taxes. I made a mistake, my withholding is too high, so the Federal government might deign to give me a little of my own money back. I'm getting the paperwork finished so I can get that money quickly and get my withholding fixed.

    I am drinking my misery away with Lancaster's Milk Stout. I might switch to something with higher alcohol later in the evening. Who else is drinking out there?

  47. The Late P Brooks   12 years ago

    I watched part of Kudlow's show a while ago. I knew better, but I watched anyway. They were talking to a woman who owns a bakery who is getting royally screwed by Obamacare, to the tune of losing two thirds of her business profits to increased costs. There was some democratic Congressman who was happily nattering about how the system is working, because the penalties are sufficiently harsh that she cannot really benefit from just dropping her employees' coverage.

    What a fucking moron; he did not listen to a single word anyone else said, he just dutifully spouted his talking points over and over like a windup monkey beating its drum.

    Then they began talking about the DHS mass ammo purchases; Kudlow is afraid the cops won't have any bullets to shoot people with. None of the idiots even pretended to give a shit about the rights of citizen gun owners.

    The Democratic Congressman switched over his "Gun Safety" talking point tape and jabbered away.

    1. OldMexican   12 years ago

      I knew better, but I watched anyway.

      Well, consider it your confirmation.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   12 years ago

        Your baptism was when you accidentally tuned in to NPR.

  48. SumpTump   12 years ago

    Come on dude, lets hit it on up one time now.

    http://www.Anon-Today.tk

  49. Ted Levy   12 years ago

    "Christie is Against Gay Conversion Therapy"

    Is that what they're calling same sex marriage in New Jersey these days?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!