Russia Warns the UK Not to Arm Syrian Rebels

Russia has said that any attempt by the British government to arm the Syria opposition will be a violation of international law.
Last week British Foreign Secretary William Hague said that the U.K. will send body armor and armored vehicles to Syrian rebels. Hague today said that the British government was keeping its options open. From the BBC:
During a press conference following a meeting with his British counterpart, Mr Lavrov said: "In our point of view it [arming the Syrian opposition] is a violation of international law."
But Mr Hague said it wasn't clear how grave the situation would become, adding: "We have never ruled out anything in the future."
"Anything we do will be legal and clearly stated to our country and to the international community."
And he insisted: "As long as a political solution is not found we will increase our support to the opposition and to the Syrian people to save lives and promote that political solution."
The BBC is also reporting that British Prime Minister David Cameron is considering vetoing an extension to the European Union's arms embargo on Syria.
While the U.S. and its European allies have not yet directly armed Assad's opposition there are reports that American, British, and French instructors have been training opposition forces in Jordan. However, according to The Guardian those being trained will not be heading back into Syria unless the situation deteriorates even further:
A Jordanian source familiar with the training operations said: "It's the Americans, Brits and French with some of the Syrian generals who defected. But we're not talking about a huge operation."
He added that there had so far been no "green light" for the rebel forces being trained to be sent into Syria. But they would be deployed if there were signs of a complete collapse of public services in the southern Syrian city of Daraa, which could trigger a million more Syrians seeking refuge in Jordan, which is reeling under the strain of accommodating the 320,000 who have already sought shelter there.
The Arab League recently announced that its members were free to send aid to Syrian rebels, and Israeli President Shimon Peres urged Arabs to intervene in Syria at a speech to the European Parliament yesterday.
The situation in Syria makes arming Assad's opposition difficult. While no one doubts the atrocities being carried out by Assad's forces the fact remains that many of the Syrian rebels have been accused of horrific crimes and have jihadist sympathies. It would be difficult to arm vetted rebel groups without being able to guarantee that weapons would not end up in the hands of the unpleasant elements of Assad's opposition. However, it is concerns regarding international law that is worrying the Russian government about Syrian rebels receiving weapons, not potential human rights abuses by Assad's opposition.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Send anyone in Syria who wants weapons a giant form that needs to be vetted by at least three Federal agencies. If anyone completes and returns the form, they're obviously fanatics and shouldn't be sent weapons.
And yes, I know this will pave the way to single-insurgent.
Socialized terrorism? Not exactly libertarian, is it?
Just for that, smart guy, we'll be sending Syrians actual deadly assault rifles and you get NOTHING! (insert Charlie and the Chocolate Factory scene)
When in the past 100 years has US foreign policy been libertarian?
But I thought sequestration meant that we did not even have enough money to train US troops, where are getting money to train Syrian rebels? Or is my TV lying to me again?
More foreign policy on autopilot. Lovely.
I sure hope they are smart enough to head that warning!
http://www.EliteAnon.tk
Don't fellate the messenger.
This is yet another example of the harm done by government-run schools - though in this case, a foreign one.
Russian Capo Vladmir "Polonium" Putin (educated in government-run schools) has failed to recognize that British arming of Syrian rebel groups is beneficial to Russian sales of arms and ammunition to Syrian, Iranian, and Hezbollah forces. These people can't even do crime right.
I'm going to open up a consulting firm for supervillains.
Russia has armed Syria already.
Check out the Russians checking in on how their T-72s are doing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFF4Gc9Mb5c
Thanks for sharing. Great websites! for More visit:- YoWhatsApp.
Thanks for sharing. Great websites! for More visit:- YoWhatsApp.