26 Percent Say Privatizing USPS Would Improve Quality and Speed of Service

Reason-Rupe asked Americans about the impact of allowing private package carriers like UPS and FedEx to deliver the mail. Most Americans (47 percent) thought the speed and quality of service would remain the same, 22 percent thought quality would worsen, and 26 percent thought service would improve.

Expectations about privatization are in part explained by the underlying favorability toward the government-owned US Postal Service (USPS). Among the fifth of Americans who have an unfavorable view of USPS, a majority (53 percent) believes privatizing would improve service quality, 32 percent say quality would remain the same and 10 percent say it would worsen. In stark contrast, among the 80 percent of Americans who have a favorable opinion of USPS only 19 percent say privatizing would improve quality, 25 percent say it would worsen quality, and a majority (51 percent) say quality would remain the same.

In sum, strong favorability of USPS deflates support for privatizing USPS mail services.

Eighty-percent of Americans are favorable toward USPS, with 28 percent who are "very favorable." But Americans also like private package carriers like UPS (84 percent favorable) and FedEx (78 percent favorable). At the same time, twice as many Americans have an unfavorable opinion of USPS as they do UPS and FedEx (17 percent versus 9 percent).

Nearly all political groups and demographics are equally critical of UPS and FedEx, but political differences emerge regarding USPS. A quarter of Republicans are unfavorable toward USPS compared to only 12 percent of Democrats. USPS may have had some difficulty in the Northeast and Southern regions, since nearly a quarter of these respondents also have an unfavorable view of USPS, while only 10 percent are critical of FedEx and UPS. Only 12 percent of Midwestern and Western respondents have an unfavorable view of USPS.

In the absence of widespread frustration with the US Postal Service, Americans may find privatizing it less compelling. The argument that privatization would harness free market forces to improve quality and reduce costs is lost on most people. Or perhaps this argument is not their initial consideration when confronted with the possibility of reform.

It is possible that with greater discussion explaining how mail delivery could be improved with removing USPS' monopoly over services, that Americans would be open to privatization. Currently, this argument has not been made salient enough such that Americans immediately bring it to mind when asked about reform.

Nationwide telephone poll conducted February 21-25 2013 interviewed 1002 adults on both mobile (502) and landline (500) phones, with a margin of error +/- 3.8%. Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results found here. Full methodology can be found here. 

Comments

[Liam Skye]

"The argument that privatization would harness free market forces to improve quality and reduce costs is lost on most people."

Not lost on people is the fact that both UPS and FedEx are a LOT more expensive than USPS. When the easily obtained empirical data do not support one's assertion, one would do well NOT to suggest that it is everybody else that doesn't get it.

[Brian]

Liam Skye:

Not lost on people is the fact that both UPS and FedEx are a LOT more expensive than USPS. When the easily obtained empirical data do not support one's assertion, one would do well NOT to suggest that it is everybody else that doesn't get it.

The legal monopoly of the post office requires that private companies handle letters for at least twice the price of the post office.

You would do well to examine the law along with empirical data, before suggesting conclusions.

[ArbutusJoe]

Not lost on informed people is the fact that postal rates are subsidized by taxpayers and do not reflect market prices in the slightest degree.

Not lost on informed people is the fact that the USPS is actively looking for ways to reduce its service offerings in both quality and quantity. Are UPS and FedEx doing this?

[grannybunny]

Privatization is not a realistic option. There is no entity -- public or private -- willing or able to replace the United States Postal Service (USPS). FedEx and UPS -- combined -- deliver 6 billion items per year to 30 million addresses, consigning a substantial portion of those to USPS for "the first and last mile." The Postal Service delivers almost 170 billion items per year, to 151+ million addresses, and the number of addresses keeps growing. Without USPS, most Americans -- those 121+ million addresses not served by the private sector -- would lack access to mail service, much less at an affordable price.

[Brian]

grannybunny:

Without USPS, most Americans -- those 121+ million addresses not served by the private sector -- would lack access to mail service, much less at an affordable price.

Is it the taxpayers problem that they want to live in hard-to-get places, yet pay the same for mail as everyone else?

[liam.lah]

It is not the taxpayers problem. The USPS is self funded.

[juliabraon]

my roomate's sister-in-law makes $74 hourly on the laptop. She has been fired from work for seven months but last month her pay check was $16116 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site

http://fly38.com

[gomezkeralen]

my best friend's sister-in-law makes $87 an hour on the internet. She has been fired from work for five months but last month her check was $16574 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more here
http://jump30.com