HHS Proposes Delaying Key Part of ObamaCare's Small Business Health Insurance Exchanges


Photo credit: Barack Obama / Foter.com / CC BY-NC-SA

In response to skepticism that ObamaCare's health insurance exchanges will be ready on schedule later this year, Obama administration officials have been swearing up and down, cross their hearts and hope to voucherize Medicare, that ObamaCare's exchanges — the health insurance portals that are the centerpiece of the law — will indeed be ready on time.

In December 2012, Gary Cohen, the Health and Human Services (HHS) official heading up implementation of the health law, said he was "confident that states and the federal government will be ready in 10 months." At the end of January, he reiterated his claim: The exchanges "will be ready," he promised members of Congress.

Does partially ready count? On Friday, HHS all but admitted that at least one element of the exchanges won't be entirely ready on time: the Small business Health Options Program (SHOP) — the health insurance exchanges ObamaCare set up to serve small employers. The SHOP exchanges were supposed to be fully in place by January 1, 2014. But newly released regulations propose delaying a key part of the small business exchanges for a year: the employee choice provisions that were arguably the most significant feature of the program.

The SHOP exchanges were supposed to help businesses with as many as 100 employees purchase employee health insurance. Employers would enroll in the exchanges, and then they would be allowed to select a broad benefit level. Employees would then be able to select from a variety of private plans classified in that benefit tier.

The HHS regulations, which are set to go into effect in May after a comment period, would delay the implementation of the employee choice option for a year in the federal exchanges, and make it merely optional in state exchanges. Under these rules, small businesses won't be able to select a benefit level; instead they will only be able to select a single plan for their employees.

This isn't quite the same as delaying the SHOP exchanges entirely. But it's close.

As influential health policy scholar (and ObamaCare backer) Timothy Jost notes in Health Affairs, most observers considered the choice option the "primary benefit" of the small business exchange. Without that option, he says, it's "unclear what advantage" the SHOP exchange would actually offer to small employers over insurance options that already existed.

Why the delay? The proposed regulations note that HHS has received comments identifying "challenges to the effective implementation of employee choice." LifeHealthPro reports that HHS officials further noted that the agency "found that many commenters were not sure whether insurers could really handle the administrative tasks associated with an employee choice program."

In other words, it's a giant technical and administrative task, and there just isn't enough time to get it all done on deadline. Which shouldn't come as a surprise: For the last year or so, we've seen reports of technical frustrations, missed and delayed deadlines, and exchange administrators who admit that the law's implementation timline just isn't feasible. Even the Congressional Budget Office has expressed some skepticism about the likely readiness of the exchanges. At this point, the big question is whether this will be the only significant delay, or whether it will be the first of many. 

NEXT: Illegal Shades of Green

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2523136

    A big problem now is that industry is falling love head-over-heels in love with the subsidies that the ACA is providing and pressuring Republican governors to enact the exchange and Medicaid expansion provisions.

  2. I am altering the deal. Pray I don’t alter it further.

    1. You wouldn’t want to leave a garrison, would you?

  3. ‘In other words, it’s a giant technical and administrative task, and there just isn’t enough time *in the universe* to get it all done’

  4. Gary Cohen, the Health and Human Services (HHS) official heading up implementation of the health law,

    Whoa, whoa, whoa… shouldn’t this guy be a household name? Given that he’s got power to reorder 1/6 of the economy, shouldn’t we know every detail about his life, e.g., where he lives, work history, potential financial conflicts of interest, whether his left or right nut hangs lower?

    I swear to god, this guy’s making major decisions for me and I’ve never fucking heard of him.

  5. I am confused. These are all parts of the law, right? So how can HHS just decide which ones they’re going to follow?

    1. Because fuck you, that’s why.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.