Sequestration Cuts Seem Increasingly Likely
Probably the best we can hope for, really
Republicans on Wednesday rejected President Obama's proposal to postpone $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts, and politicians of both parties warned that a March 1 sequester that would slash military and domestic programs and jeopardize the nation's economic recovery is now more likely than ever.
"It's probably going to happen," Rep. Robert Scott, D-Va., told The Washington Examiner on Wednesday as Democrats left the House for a two-day retreat in Leesburg.
Republicans believe they hold the leverage in the sequester stalemate because polls show the public wants to rein in government spending.
"Republicans have the upper hand, because by doing nothing, they get what they want -- real cuts," said Republican strategist Matt Mackowiak.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A populace that feeds on itself will choke to death on its own entrails.
I for one hope we see the sequester take effect.