Ayn Rand

Sen. Ron Johnson Compares Modern America to "Atlas Shrugged"

You're not the only one, Ron


Sen. Ron Johnson said there were "absolutely" parallels between the novel "Atlas Shrugged" and America today in an interview published Monday with a group that promotes the work of libertarian philosopher Ayn Rand, the book's author.

"Absolutely," the Wisconsin Republican said when asked by an interviewer from the Atlas Society if "Atlas Shrugged" resembled modern-day America.

In the 1957 novel, society's most productive and wealthy citizens go on strike to protest increased government taxes and regulation. Millions of copies have sold since the book's release, and tens of thousands of copies are still sold each year.

NEXT: Wedding Businesses See New Opportunity in Gay Marriage

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “I reject her philosophy,” Ryan said. “It’s an atheist philosophy. It reduces human interactions down to mere contracts and it is antithetical to my worldview.”

    Wrong. It properly defines human interactions as contracts; nothing ‘mere’ about it.

    1. Ron Johnson is not Paul Ryan?

      1. Seemingly not.

  2. until I looked at the draft four $6116, I have faith that my best friend had been truly taking home money parttime on their apple labtop.. there friends cousin haz done this 4 only about 11 months and a short time ago cleared the dept on there villa and purchased a great new Lotus Carlton. read more at…… http://BIT40.com

  3. Ayn Rand on libertarians (from the Ford Hall Forum, 1981):

    “Q: Why don’t you approve of libertarians, thousands of whom are loyal readers of your works?

    AR: Because libertarians are a monstrous, disgusting bunch of people: they plagiarize my ideas when that fits their purpose, and denounce me in a more vicious manner than any communist publication when that fits their purpose. They’re lower than any pragmatists, and what they hold against Objectivism is morality. They want an amoral political program.”

    Maybe if she were still alive then she’d think differently about today’s libertarian movement, but calling her a “libertarian philosopher” is false, because in her lifetime she had no respect for libertarian philosophy.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.