Rich Biz Gives More
Corporate social responsibility
Firms that feel flush are more likely to engage in corporate social responsibility, according to a new National Bureau of Economic Research working paper. In their October study "Financial Constraints on Corporate Goodness," economists Harrison Hong and Jose A. Scheinkman of Princeton University and Jeffrey D. Kubik of Syracuse University challenge the growing consensus that corporations can boost profits through environmental programs, philanthropic giving, or community building.
Comparing the behavior of firms before the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s with their choices mid-bubble, Hong and his colleagues found that when companies experienced an influx of cash or otherwise became less financially constrained, they were more likely to engage in socially responsible practices. The economists also looked at idiosyncratic variations between firms. In both scenarios, they found that corporate social responsibility was more sensitive to increased financial slack than other spending decisions, such as R&D and capital investment. The authors conclude that "firms are more likely to do good when they do well."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Thank you very much
Thank you very much
bubble, Hong and his colleagues found that when companies
experienced an influx of cash or otherwise became less financially
before the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s with their choices