Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Don't Believe Initial Accounts of Drone Strikes Killing 'Al Qaeda Militants'

Matt Welch | 12.27.2012 6:35 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Foreign Policy has a perfectly awful account of a U.S. drone strike in Yemen this September that killed a dozen civilians. Begins like this:

SANAA, Yemen — The villagers who rushed to the road, cutting through rocky fields in central Yemen, found the dead strewn around a burning sport utility vehicle. The bodies were dusted with white powder -- flour and sugar, the witnesses said -- that the victims were bringing home from market when the aircraft attacked. A torched woman clutched her daughter in a lifeless embrace. Four severed heads littered the pavement.

"The bodies were charred like coal. I could not recognize the faces," said Ahmed al-Sabooli, 22, a farmer whose parents and 10-year-old sister were among the dead. "Then I recognized my mother because she was still holding my sister in her lap. That is when I cried."

What enables such state-sanctioned murder? One crucial ingredient is highlighted in the next paragraph:

Quoting unnamed Yemeni officials, local and international media initially described the victims of the Sept. 2 airstrike in al-Bayda governorate as al Qaeda militants.

Follow that link to the Sept. 2 Reuters article, and you'll see this loaded lead paragraph:

Five suspected militants linked to al Qaeda were killed by a U.S. drone attack on Sunday in central Yemen, in what appears to be stepped up strikes by unmanned aircraft on Islamists.

Note that "suspected" only modifies "militants"; Reuters treated as fact that the charred bodies were "linked to al Qaeda," and part of a broader campaign against "Islamists" who don't qualify as being "suspected."

This isn't just linguistic nitpicking of journalismese; this is how you midwife propaganda–straight from anonymous government sources who have a huge incentive to legitimize targeted death-dealing against undesirables, and unadorned with the kind of protective skepticism that such ultimate power (let alone fog of war) so richly deserves.

Link via the Twitter feed of Laura Pitter. Reason on drone strikes here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Deadly Weapon

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsDronesWorldScience & TechnologyCivil LibertiesPolicyForeign PolicyWarYemen
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (12)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. anon   13 years ago

    But, they were suspected of being militants.

    Just like they're going to "suspect" gun owners of being domestic terrorists.

    Why do you hate children?

  2. RightNut   13 years ago

    After 9/11/01, I thought that the people equating US military actions to the terrorist attack were pretty disgusting. After all these drone "strikes" on "suspected Islamist", I think they now have a pretty legitimate point.

    1. GroundTruth   13 years ago

      Sadly true.

  3. waaminn   13 years ago

    Now that looks like it might jsut work. Wow.

    http://www.Privacy-OT.tk

  4. $park?   13 years ago

    A torched woman clutched her daughter in a lifeless embrace. Four severed heads littered the pavement.

    No less than they deserve for living in a terrorist sponsoring state. If they don't want to end up like this, they ought to either move or drive out the terrorists living among them.

    /John and/or Cytotoxic

    1. Cytotoxic   13 years ago

      "If they don't want to end up like this, they ought to either move or drive out the terrorists living among them."

      Sounds right.

  5. The Late P Brooks   13 years ago

    Dehumanize the enemy; the foundation of wartime propaganda.

  6. DJF   13 years ago

    I don't believe initial reports about anything. They are usually wrong and often used by people to push their own particular point of view

    Initial reports should be used mostly to inform you that something has happened and that you should keep an eye on it to see how the story develops.

  7. Skip   13 years ago

    Thank Gaia the wise Obama was responsible for this and not the dumb redneck Bush!

  8. paranoid android   13 years ago

    Who says American manufacturing is dead? We're clearly still #1 when it comes to manufacturing consent.

  9. johnl   13 years ago

    Was there ever a time when journalists didn't completely trust the government? It's really rare to see "suspected" or "alleged" used correctly in an article in the city section of the paper. They are used incorrectly more often than correctly, to the point tht standard English speakers think "suspect" means the person who did it.

  10. jensfiederer@gmail.com   13 years ago

    "linked to Al Qaeda" doesn't need a "suspected" because it is obviously true. The only thing that could be argued about is what specifically the links are.

    The US military is linked to Al Qaeda, too, the links just aren't cordial ones. "Linked to" without more detail is almost meaningless.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Affordability' Politics Is a Major Opening for the Free Market Message in the New Year

Christian Britschgi | 12.31.2025 3:35 PM

If You Give a Bear a Badge, Will It Respect Your Rights?

Jacob Sullum | 12.31.2025 3:10 PM

The Big Lesson of the 2020s? Don't Ignore the Economists.

Eric Boehm | 12.31.2025 1:00 PM

Study: Short-Form Video Isn't Rotting Your Brain

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.31.2025 12:24 PM

DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship

C.J. Ciaramella | 12.31.2025 12:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks