Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Romney Leads Obama by Seven Points, DOMA Struck Down, Annual Welfare Spending Tops $1T: P.M. Links

J.D. Tuccille | 10.18.2012 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
  • Gallup now has Romney leading Obama by seven points nationally among likely voters, though that doesn't necessarily address big regional variations (guess who is leading by a lot in the deep South).

  • The anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act was slapped down as a violation of the right to equal protection by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
  • The U.S. ambassador to Turkey spilled the beans about an American offer to help with efforts against the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party. Is there some kind of prize for meddling in the internal affairs of volatile countries? (H/T: Paul Scott)
  • Greek police are skeeving out their co-citizens by developing close ties to the nativist, bigoted Golden Dawn party.
  • The federal government and the various state governments spent a combined $1.03 trillion on welfare programs in 2011. No, that doesn't include Social Security and Medicare.
  • San Antonio police officers responding to a call went to the wrong door and … shot the family dog. The pooch lived, though it's suffering. 
  • Now that planets have been discovered there, a private group wants to send a probe to Alpha Centauri.

Have a news tip for us? Send it to: 24_7@reason.com

Don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily AM/PM updates for more content.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Was Fed Reserve Bomber Wannabe Really a Threat?

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (398)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    The federal government and the various state governments spent a combined $1.03 trillion on welfare programs in 2011.

    Must be why there aren't any poor people around anymore.

    1. MikeP   13 years ago

      $3,000 for every man, woman, and child.

      $12,000 for the poverbial family of four.

      1. MikeP   13 years ago

        And in case you're wondering:

        $22,000 for every man, woman, and child under the poverty line.

        $90,000 for the povertial family of four.

        And this doesn't even include those bastions of misguided welfare -- Social Security and Medicare.

        Astonishing.

        1. wareagle   13 years ago

          and despite that, you still hate the poorz.

        2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          This is why I get my dander ruffled when MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX is placed ahead of discretionary spending, as the former WAY outstrips the latter. I'm no Warboner, but as the Iron Law goes:

          "If everything is a priority, then nothing is a priority."

          I would prefer to slash this entitlement spending first, then get to reducing the military.

          1. Carston   13 years ago

            Agreed, even though we are way too interventionist, national defense is an actual legitimate function of the federal government, while basically everything else it dos, is not.

        3. R C Dean   13 years ago

          $90,000 for the povertial family of four.

          If that's a typo (and I'm gonna say it is), then we can close the rolls for R C'z Law for the year, and declare it a typo that has ascended to neologism.

        4. robc   13 years ago

          Negative income tax would be a lot cheaper.

          Actually, it wouldnt be, except that you could end all the programs too, and thus, it is.

    2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      Someone was asking my why block grants would not help and insure ObamneyCare stays in place, there's another answer.

      You can be quite sure that many medical assistance programs that are not specifically itemized under Medicaid are in the there.

    3. Trespassers W   13 years ago

      A trillion here and a trillion there... it starts to add up, doesn't it?

    4. Don Mynack   13 years ago

      They also gave $5.5 billion to something called "Indian Health Service". I don't think we should be subsidizing health care in the sub-continent.

      1. Rhinonamous   13 years ago

        ...racist...

  2. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Now that planets have been discovered there, a private group wants to send a probe to Alpha Centauri.

    You just want to make sure you keep their probes away from Uranus.

    1. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Well it's not like they're gonna be interested in sending a probe to Uranus cause all they'll find there is a giant black hole pulling anything nearby inside it.

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        Might as well use the gravity assist.

      2. BakedPenguin   13 years ago

        C'mon, Rasilio, Fist isn't that big of a slut.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

          DON'T BE SO SURE.

    2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

      What's the fastest we've gotten a probe--150,000 mph or so? I think we'd better improve upon that dramatically or there's no point in launching one.

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        They've got a willing GNC engineer here.

        1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          What do we need here, nuclear propulsion? Solar sails? I figure it's not worth doing unless we can get up to at least 0.1c.

          1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

            How big of a probe are you talking? And probably more important: do you want it to stop?

            1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

              Big enough to send me back some data decades later. And I think it's got to stop--if it bolts through at an appreciable fraction of light speed, that's too quick.

              1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

                Ah, so you want the whole "stop and observe" package huh? Well that's gonna cost extra.

                My personal guess is that we'd use a solar sail for acceleration (with some lasers to keep up the gas after you leave the system). You can theoretically get close to 0.1 c with this setup.

                Then we'd use a combination of traditional propulsion and magsail to slow down (but probably not stop).

                1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                  It would be a shame to spend all that time waiting, then get only a few weeks or months of decent data.

                  I'd also like to stop by Voyager, pick it up, and send it back to Earth, just to piss off NASA.

                  1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

                    But we need Voyager to smash into God!

                    1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                      Sorry, it's too much fun to tweak NASA's nose. Besides, V'ger.

                    2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

                      Can't we just piss off NASA by doing actual space exploration without them?

                    3. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                      Why stop there when you're interstellar?

                    4. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

                      Because we're above them so much they don't deserve our notice. Which will piss them off even more.

                    5. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                      Well, okay.

          2. robc   13 years ago

            .1c at turnover?

            That shouldnt be too hard, but I would have to do the math.

            1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

              I was thinking an average speed of 0.1c. But let's not quibble.

        2. JW   13 years ago

          Son, a bunch of vitamins and holistic quackery won't help us reach another star.

          1. rac3rx   13 years ago

            +1 MegaMan

          2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

            You obviously have never smoked the shit my holistic quack peddles.

      2. db   13 years ago

        Big Motherfucking Laser propulsion will get it there, but how to slow it down?

        1. JW   13 years ago

          THEY PROMISED US RAMJETS.

        2. Trespassers W   13 years ago

          Deploy a space parachute.

          1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

            That's basically what a magnetic sail is.

        3. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          Put an old person behind the wheel.

        4. robc   13 years ago

          The centauris use their laser. Duh.

          1. JW   13 years ago

            Nah. The planet will stop it.

            1. JW   13 years ago

              The centauris use their laser.

              You mean the Kzin, right?

              1. robc   13 years ago

                I was thinking more Moties-New Scotland.

                1. Brett L   13 years ago

                  Nice.

          2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

            And if they don't have one, they're too primitive to continue, so just initiate a massive flare in their sun.

      3. Rasilio   13 years ago

        We've actually got several technologies that could expand on that quite a bit, we just havn't had a mission to justify the cost of using them. We've already demonstrated Solar Sails and Ion propulsion engines, both of which would be capable of extended constant acceleration. In theory using just off the shelf technologies we could combine the 2, use the Solar Sail out to somewhere around the orbit of Pluto, then ditch that and turn on banks of ion thrusters. Realitically we should be able to keep that accelerating for at least 20 years or so and even with an acceleration of only 1/1000th of a gravity you'll be going pretty damn fast by that point.

        Course you'd still be looking at a 100 year plus trip one way

        1. gaijin   13 years ago

          instead of getting the ship to go faster, how do we get life to go longer...suspended animation always works in the movies!

          1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

            Except when the cyro-tubes are controlled by homicidal computers.

            1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

              Don't be ridiculous! That only happens when uncharted planets send out SOS signals, and we all know that never happens!

              1. JW   13 years ago

                I'm just going to leave this here.

                1. JW   13 years ago

                  I'm just going to leave this here, too.

                  1. JW   13 years ago

                    And the squirrels ate the ampersand in the link.

                    :::sigh::: Got to 21:12.

                    1. Restoras   13 years ago

                      RRRRRUUUUUSSHHHHH!!

          2. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

            Clearly none of you fuckers remember Event Horizon. In it, Sam Neill patiently explained that space can simply be folded, so that the distance between Point A and Point B becomes nil. Mr. Neill even took the time to illustrate this principle by drawing an A and a B at opposite ends of a sheet of paper then - you guessed it - folding it.

            1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

              I have it on good authority that it's impossible for any point in the universe to be further than 6000 light years away.

              1. SKR   13 years ago

                Lol, i hadn't considered that angle of nuttery.

                1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

                  Exactly, which is why we're sitting here droning on about ion sails and freakin laser beams. The science is settled, people, and it involves none of that sorcery.

                2. db   13 years ago

                  All that crap about "invisible dark matter?" That's just God's not inconsiderable omnipresent weight in another dimension.

            2. JW   13 years ago

              So, we can use paper to get there. How far can we get on 4 reams?

              1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

                So, we can use paper to get there. How far can we get on 4 reams?

                Four reams should be enough to tear a hole in our universe and open a gateway to another dimension. A dimension of pure chaos. Pure evil.

                But I'd toss in a few extra loose sheets, just in case!

                1. Karl Hungus   13 years ago

                  Five reams to get back, since you'll be flying against the jet stream.

                2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                  What if I used very thin crepes instead of paper, folded them, and ate them?

                  1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

                    Then you'd be a Frenchie, Frenchie.

                    *spits on floor*

                    1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                      Oh, that's a good point. How about a tortilla then?

            3. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

              The mere act of so folding will actually get you where you want to go.

            4. StacyKay   13 years ago

              Idea stolen from Heinlen's "Starman Jones".

            5. Rasilio   13 years ago

              They are actually working on this, not jump drives like in Event Horizon but rather Star Trek style Warp Drives, really the big problem with that is the power system, if we could generate the energy we could probably have a working warp drive in less than 100 years.

          3. Rasilio   13 years ago

            Well because at current levels of technology we're not talking about sending a colony ship we're talking about sending something the equivalent of Voyager, carrying sufficient oxygen water and food for even 1 passenger would make the ship too heavy to move with our available technologies.

            1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

              Given a sufficient power supply, both oxygen and water could be recycled and re-used indefinitely.

        2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          You can keep using the solar sail even when it's that far out, if you beam a concentrated light at it. Yup, like most things, this gets better with lasers.

          1. robc   13 years ago

            You can take your laser with you too.

          2. db   13 years ago

            It'd be interesting to demonstrate tacking against the laser beam with a solar sail. If it works the way an aerodynamic sail does, one could get more acceleration that way than on the way out.

            But you have to rely on someone keeping the laser running for a few decades.

            1. robc   13 years ago

              But you have to rely on someone keeping the laser running for a few decades.

              That was the problem the Moties had.

              1. Rasilio   13 years ago

                Well the moties did keep it running for like 40 years and their ship did make it with at least a portion of the crew alive, they just suicided when the MacArthur intercepted them.

      4. Tman   13 years ago

        Even if we could travel at 150K (and we can't) it would take us about 20,000 years.

        In other words, pointless.

        1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          The Helios probes got up to 150K mph. And we've never really tried to go fast just for fastness' sake. I bet we could get something up to 1 million mph or an appreciable fraction thereof without any kind of major technological breakthrough.

          That's still too slow, of course, but this isn't something we've actually tried to do yet, either.

          1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

            Yeah, we haven't tried yet.

            1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

              For intrasystem travel, if we could get up to, say, 1 million mph, we could move around fairly quickly. Saturn, for instance, is between 800 million and 1 billion miles from Earth at any given time. If we could get a ship up to an average speed of 1 million mph, that's a thousand hours to Saturn at its maximum distance.

              For unmanned vehicles, that's not an insane leap from where we are now. For manned, well, that's a lot of acceleration and that speed might create some dangers of its own if you run into anything. On the other hand, it would eliminate most of the concerns about long-duration spaceflight.

              1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                Mars ranges from 35 to 250 million miles from Earth, so our hypothetical ship could do that trip in 35 to 250 hours. At its closest, we could send a ship there in less than two days, discounting acceleration and deceleration for the moment.

              2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

                I think that kind of acceleration is not achievable that easily. Part of why we could do such high speeds on interstellar missions are that the power requirements for those slower accelerations are so much easier.

                1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

                  Right, an ion drive is out for anything fast in-system. But there are other options.

                  Really, even 250K mph would bring the inner system within easy reach.

                  What we really need more than anything is cheap access to orbit. If we can do that, the rest should follow.

      5. Rasilio   13 years ago

        If you could manage a constant acceleration of .01g (0.1m/s^2) for 30 years you would reach a speed of over 300,000,000 MPH. At that speed you would need less than another 9 years to reach Alpha Centauri giving us a flyby probe in 40 years.

        We could actually do this with technology that is already past the prototype stage

        If you want the ship to reach there and stop you're looking at a longer trip, probably around 65 years but still probably within our reach to launch in the near term future.

        1. Ted S.   13 years ago

          Something tells me relativity is going to factor in here, and you haven't taken that into account.

          1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

            That's less than half the speed of light. No major relativistic effects at that speed.

            I'll believe we can easily achieve such speeds when we do it. Lots of devils in the details.

    3. gaijin   13 years ago

      Uranus...home of the Suppository Peoples?

  3. A Serious Man   13 years ago

    Texas judge rules that high school cheerleaders can display Christian themed banners at football games until the issue goes to court next year.

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      He just didn't want their mothers to come after him.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      A question to Christians:

      Why do you think God/Jesus/Holy Spirit cares about your sporting events?

      1. Rasilio   13 years ago

        Because did you see those 2 catches the Giants made against the Pats? The only possible explaination is God was jealous of Brady and worried he'd take his place.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

          Why are you ascribing said event to any other deity than the one who made it possible, i.e. the all-mighty Thor?

          1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

            Thor is a cricket-lovin' candy-ass!

            1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

              Hey, what's wrong with cricket?

              1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

                It's a game in which three people play and ten people watch. It's like baseball with an extra helping of suck.

                1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                  Them fighting words.

                  1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

                    Whacha gonna do? Sticky my wicket?

                    1. SKR   13 years ago

                      Watch out those crazy white robots are hell bent on destroying the cosmos. You don't want to piss them off.

                    2. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

                      White robots don't scare me.

                      White Martians on the other hand...

              2. Mickey Rat   13 years ago

                "Hey, what's wrong with cricket?"

                Making a game out of a xenocidal war is in such poor taste.

        2. hamilton   13 years ago

          The only possible explaination is God was jealous of Brady and worried he'd take his place.

          Brady was going to move from quarterback to Head Coach of the Pats?

      2. SugarFree   13 years ago

        Metaphysics has nothing to do with culture war.

      3. DRM   13 years ago

        You know, that's actually a pretty easy one. In their holy book, they're told by Jesus that not even a sparrow falls except as willed by God, and that God keeps count of the numbers of hairs on each individual's head.

      4. Don Mynack   13 years ago

        Nope, but only God beats the sports book in Vegas.

      5. VG Zaytsev   13 years ago

        Why do you think God/Jesus/Holy Spirit cares about your sporting events?

        He likes hot cheerleaders.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    The anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act was slapped down as a violation of the right to equal protection by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Is anyone even defending it in court these days?

    1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

      Obama.

      When Barack Obama ran for President, he pledged to fully repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) ? a mean-spirited piece of legislation that Bill Clinton signed in 1996 for crass political reasons. Obama says it's still his intent to do so, but has yet to follow up with any action. Meanwhile, the U.S. Justice Department filed a brief late last week defending a constitutional challenge to DOMA. The brief did not merely argue against the lawsuit on technical grounds such as the plaintiffs' lack of standing, but advanced legal arguments that ? if pursued by the courts ? could greatly damage gay and lesbian rights. Most lawyers at the Justice Department who write these briefs are civil servants who cannot be replaced by a new President, and one of the authors was in fact a right-wing holdover from the Bush years. But Tony West, an Obama appointee and the brother-in-law of San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris, allowed it to be filed in court ? and his name appears on the front page. As Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division, West may argue that he's "just doing his job" ? i.e., defending existing federal law. But the Administration can use discretion in these lawsuits, making this unacceptable.

      1. Spoonman.   13 years ago

        Man I despise that guy.

        And then I listen to Romney talk and I hate him too. Both of them are just horrible slimy shitbirds.

        1. The Hammer   13 years ago

          Careful, there are some inexplicable Romney zealots here.

          1. Enough About Palin   13 years ago

            Name one.

            1. T   13 years ago

              Your mom?

              1. Enough About Palin   13 years ago

                She's dead, asshole.

            2. The Hammer   13 years ago

              Tulpa.

      2. torrentprime   13 years ago

        My god; you're out of date.
        Obama stopped defending this law years ago, after the courts started knocking it down. Just happened to have a 2009 article laying around, huh?

        "President Obama has instructed the Justice Department to no longer defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, the legal prohibition on federal recognition of same-sex marriages." Link

        The only ones defending it are the House GOP; spent a million or so, so far. Chump change, but still.

    2. R C Dean   13 years ago

      I'll have to dig up the opinion, and see if it relies on the usual dodge of redefining marriage in order to hold that marriage should be redefined.

      1. R C Dean   13 years ago

        A very quick read shows that it basically went off as a state's rights opinion, holding that the definition of marriage is left to the states, and the feds have to honor the state's definition.

        They rather neatly discard the "traditional" definition by pointing out that its the state's definition that matters.

        I'll have to study it a little more to figure out how this made this an equal protection case.

        1. robc   13 years ago

          They dont want to give the 10th amendment any power back?

  5. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

    HuffPo commenter goes full retard and doesn't understand the concept of false choices:

    In response to my saying that government should have no role whatsoever in contraception, he replies "And the church should" to which I pointed out that there are other options. It replies thusly:

    Because those that believe the government should have nothing to do with contraceptive care base that belief on religious doctrine. There is no other reason to express that view.

    And that is just one brand of crazy that occurred in that thread.

    1. JW   13 years ago

      You get what you deserve for wading into that cesspool of TEAM TARD.

      1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

        I agree. But sometimes it's just too tempting to avoid.

        1. Episiarch   13 years ago

          Just face up to the fact you're a masochist and wade back in. You realize this makes you just like NutraSweet, right?

          1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

            *shudders*

            *whishpers in hush tones*

            "Yes."

            1. SugarFree   13 years ago

              Lulz are their own reward.

              1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

                We need to hang, Sug. Besides being a guy who generally hates other people, I can't think of a single reason why. You can drink your nasty beer, and I'll sit by and SHINE my shoes. Or SHINE the table or something.

      2. Killazontherun   13 years ago

        NKG is doing us a favor. Those of us who are not even close to completing our shelters need to be reminded that the tipping point for the Zombie Apocalypse is close at hand as a kick in the butt.

    2. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      Church or state, you have no other options! It's not as though you can apply reason or logic to the issue, no siree!

      Some days, I wish I wasn't a misanthrope. Thankfully, this isn't one of them.

    3. The Hammer   13 years ago

      I'm l3randon in the cesspool, and I am your 3rd fan. I like to wade in over there daily to see what crap they are spewing, and it is indeed hard to keep from calling out some of the more egregiously stupid comments which, sadly, come from the articles as often as the comments section.

    4. mr simple   13 years ago

      If you're blueGrassTubb, then you should have responded to SmileAndActNice's comment with a "What do you mean 'you people'?"

      1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

        I had thought about it. Hard. But decided that would lower the bar even lower than she had already set it.

        And considering all of her presumptions are wrong, she was talking to some other "you people" anyways.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    San Antonio police officers responding to a call went to the wrong door and ... shot the family dog.

    In the officer's defense fuck you.

    1. Rasilio   13 years ago

      I heard the dog was secretly a Muslim and was caught plotting to pee on a federal official so really they were just defending our freedoms

  7. Brett L   13 years ago

    Kids suspended for accidentally seeing pics of their teacher's tits. Apparently, pressing the wrong button on her iPad was a violation of school rules. Or something. My foot would be up someone's ass if this happened to my kid.

    1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      The school district said it has taken action against the teacher, but refused to specify what action, only that she is still a member of the school staff.

      So the teacher TITS on her IPhone (two blatant signs of a dumbass), fails to properly secure the TITSing. exposing a minor to photos of her TITS, and she's still on staff?

      Shouldn't she be registering as a sex offender right now?

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        That only works if the pic have DICKS.

        1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

          Well that's not right. TITS are scientifically shown (by science) to have more influence on the minds of the youth than DIKS. If anything, showing TITS to a minor should be a capital offense, like in derka derka jihad land.

    2. generic Brand   13 years ago

      Pics of the teacher or it didn't happen.

    3. Coeus   13 years ago

      My foot would be up someone's ass if this happened to my kid.

      Now I know apple makes easy to use products, but they definitely intentionally linked up to her unsecured phone and went browsing. I mean seriously, there is no way in hell that happened by pushing a button while in another app.

      1. Brett L   13 years ago

        Nah. I think she sync'ed her photo library accidentally. I did that upgrading from iOS4 to 5. I, uh, noticed because some delightful pics of an ex-gf showed up again in my photo library. The i-stuff all wants to upload all pics from all devices to a common library and share them. Which is great if your a 30-something married couple with a tame sex life. They should really have a "single people" setting. Do NOT share my pics across device until I tell it to.

        1. Coeus   13 years ago

          It's not account specific?

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            Most people have their devices sync'ed to one account. Otherwise you can't shared paid apps across multiple devices. So yeah. Make sure you don't autosync your pics if you have people in your life who shouldn't see boobies that you have pics of.

            1. Coeus   13 years ago

              Ok, so you figure she synced into the school's account to use their apps for free and then accidently autosynced her pics? But wouldn't that go to all the ipads on the school account instead of just one?

  8. Brett L   13 years ago

    Who does he think he is? A union boss?

    Mitt Romney wants your vote. And if you're a small business owner, he wants your employees' votes as well and insists that there's nothing wrong with giving them a little guidance this election cycle. On June 6, Romney led a conference call with support from the ?ber-conservative National Federation of Independent Business and -- to cut to the chase -- urged the bosses on the call to persuade their employees to vote for him in the upcoming election.

    (Parenthetically, I tried "an" in front of "union boss" and it sounded wrong. In fact most long "u" sounds wrong with an. I'd also write "a uvula". Am I way off the grammar reservation here?)

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      Whoops! link here.

    2. Ice Nine   13 years ago

      (Parenthetically, I tried "an" in front of "union boss" and it sounded wrong. In fact most long "u" sounds wrong with an. I'd also write "a uvula". Am I way off the grammar reservation here?)

      No, you are not. It is the sound that governs, not the letter.

      1. Paul.   13 years ago

        And who governs the sound?

        1. Spoonman.   13 years ago

          Rick Perry, unfortunately.

          1. Ice Nine   13 years ago

            Neg. Christine Gregoire.

        2. rts   13 years ago

          Master Blaster.

        3. Ted S.   13 years ago

          An historian, of course.

  9. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

    Hmmmm... a shot across the bow?

    "Governor Romney's argument is 'we're not fixed, so fire him and put me in.' It is true, we're not fixed," [Bill] Clinton said at a campaign stop with Bruce Springsteen in Parma, Ohio. "When President Obama looked into the eyes of that man who said in the debate, 'I had so much hope four years ago and I don't now,' I thought he was going to cry because he knows that it's not fixed."

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      Clinton: Shank your enemies hard and your "allies" harder.

      I love Billy Jeff as a political animal. As a human being, he's kind of a scumbag.

      1. Marshall Gill   13 years ago

        Kind of?

    2. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

      Hmmmm... a shot across the bow?

      Nope. Just a shifting to the tactic of pretending that Obama hasn't been in control for 4 years. They want to still act as if he's had no power at all. It's an extension of the "BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSCH!" tactic.

      Besides, just imagine the mess he'll inherit if he's re-elected.

    3. A Serious Man   13 years ago

      They're really going all in with the "Romney is Satan, ignore that Obama has failed" strategy.

      1. Episiarch   13 years ago

        Did they have any other choice whatsoever? Any?

    4. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      If Hillary resigns, she comes back home to Bill. If Barry loses, Hillary comes back home to Bill. But Bill really doesn't like Barry and Bill is a loyal TEAM Blue man. So he'll help Barry, but he'll also slip one in on Barry at convenient moments.

      1. R C Dean   13 years ago

        Bill is loyal to TEAM CLINTON, first, last, and always.

        Now, when TEAM BLUE and TEAM CLINTON align, Bill can give the impression of being a TEAM BLUE guy.

        When TEAM BLUE's head honcho starts looking like a liability for TEAM CLINTON, the knives come out.

        1. robc   13 years ago

          However, Im not sure Bill considers Hillary part of TEAM CLINTON.

          1. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

            She's got the dirt on him. And him on her. It's a relationship grounded in MAD.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   13 years ago

    Gallup now has Romney leading Obama by seven points nationally among likely voters...

    No one gives a shit about nationally, Gallup. Where are they in Ohio, Florida, Virginia and (yes) Pennsylvania? The other states can all go fuck themselves with their solid, already decided colors.

    1. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Actually it would be a very interesting case if Romney won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote, especially if it turned on a ridiculously close vote in a swing state.

      Gotta wonder how the lefties would handle that situation after all the crap they threw at Bush.

      I predict if it does happen you will see every major network do an exposee on just how important and critical the Electoral College is to our system of government.

      1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

        They will all hail Gore v Bush as what helped to save America.

      2. Episiarch   13 years ago

        Dude, I've been waiting for that to happen since 2000. The best part is they will do it without the slightest embarrassment, whole hog.

        1. Spoonman.   13 years ago

          Oh yeah. And lots of sneering about how this time is different, and who cares how those rednecks vote anyways.

          1. Episiarch   13 years ago

            Watching the TEAMs diametrically switch positions 180 degrees used to be frustrating but at this point it's so predictable and utterly without integrity that it's become dull and unexciting.

            We need them to achieve a new level of abject scumbaggery, something so depraved and conscienceless that it becomes exciting again. Hey, let's everyone speculate on how the next level of depravity will be reached!

            I say they will excuse a TEAM member of a heinous crime, something really bad like leaving a girl to drown so that the person driving doesn't get in any trouble.

            1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

              How about if some anti-gun politicians intentionally put a bunch of guns in the hands of a Mexican drug cartel?

              1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                Dude, I was trying to be serious and was soliciting serious speculations. Way to be a dick, though.

                1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

                  OK, how about this? What if an anti-war president is elected, but he then triples the number of troops in one war zone while starting a whole new war in another?

                  1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                    Please....it would take something like executing two American citizens without anything resembling due process.

                  2. Spoonman.   13 years ago

                    Or, or, a president could get elected propounding a humble foreign policy, then he could invade and occupy all sorts of shitholes?

              2. Matrix   13 years ago

                No ya'll are just bein' silly. Nothing like that would ever happen!

                1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                  So you guys are just being dicks and have no real suggestions. Whatever, we all know the TEAMs have reached the limits of their depravity and can't go any further. Right?

                  1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

                    Yes, certainly. James Cameron raised the bar a few weeks ago, so all that depravity will so be just a bad memory.

            2. Enough About Palin   13 years ago

              Maybe they don't call 911 when their friend OD's?

              1. wareagle   13 years ago

                I refuse to believe that either Team has reached full depravity or that such a thing even exists.

            3. generic Brand   13 years ago

              How about a former governor best known for creating a mandatory health insurance plan runs on a campaign to repeal a mandatory health insurance plan.

              Nah... now I'm just getting into the absurd.

              1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

                No, it has to be something believable.

                1. wareagle   13 years ago

                  maybe a bunch of Americans will get killed in a planned attack, but it'll be blamed on a video and the guy who made the film will be arrested while those who did the killing walk away.

            4. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

              We need them to achieve a new level of abject scumbaggery, something so depraved and conscienceless that it becomes exciting again. Hey, let's everyone speculate on how the next level of depravity will be reached!

              Adopting online speech laws like the other countries. Either that or a takeover of The Intertoobz and digital media under those types of rationale.

              As far as sheer depravity, I dunno, Epi. I think we have hit Peak Depravity from politicians a long time ago, we just don't hear about it.

              1. Coeus   13 years ago

                As far as sheer depravity, I dunno, Epi. I think we have hit Peak Depravity from politicians a long time ago, we just don't hear about it.

                With the way they go after whistle-blowers now, this would not be suprising.

            5. DK   13 years ago

              something so depraved and conscienceless

              Pics of Pelosi giving Boehner a BJ. Which would lead to the exposure of the evermore expansive secret bipartisan COC (Congressional Orgy Caucus).

              1. T   13 years ago

                That's more tasteless than conscienceless.

            6. robc   13 years ago

              Hey, let's everyone speculate on how the next level of depravity will be reached!

              A tie in the EC and it gets thrown into the House, which is controlled by GOP states.

              1. robc   13 years ago

                Or better yet, Obama "wins" the EC vote 269-266-3, and Romney wins in the House.

                1. Marshall Gill   13 years ago

                  Science, Rob, that would be fucking epic!

        2. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

          It's The Team? all the way.

      3. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        Hey, I already raised this idea in the regulation thread!

        1. sage   13 years ago

          Suki, can we get a ruling?

          1. Episiarch   13 years ago

            Realdolls can't give rulings, sage.

            1. Warty   13 years ago

              Well, what if your boner is 12 inches? They could probably give you a ruler then.

              1. Episiarch   13 years ago

                I shudder to think what you would do with that ruler. Involving your pee hole.

    2. hotsy totsy   13 years ago

      On the RealClearPolitics site today, they had Romney ahead in electoral votes as well, though neither had the 280 required to win.

    3. db   13 years ago

      The gallup poll question that keeps getting reported gives the respondent a purely binary choice. No room for "neither of those assholez" or "Gary Johnson."

    4. The Hammer   13 years ago

      Colorado is already decided? Then why do I see more political commercials than beer commercials during football games? THAT IS NOT RIGHT!!!

  11. Lisa   13 years ago

    "guess who is leading by a lot in the deep South"

    Hitler?

    1. T   13 years ago

      Paula Deen?

    2. Restoras   13 years ago

      Richard Petty?

    3. sloopyinca   13 years ago

      The Houston Texans and the Atlanta Falcons?

  12. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Well, we finally broke down and bought some swine. That 11-month lady on the left needs a name, so please help us out. The 5-month old razorback on the right is "Little Dunphy"

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      The supposed "comedienne" from Jezebel. whats her name?

      1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

        Ooh, ooh. Lindy West it is!

      2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

        Lindy West.

        Please...please...please name it Lindy West.

        Then post a youtube video when she gets slaughtered.

        1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

          It's a deal!

          1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

            Great! And make sure you don't waste the intestines and innards like these guys.

            1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

              Screencap: "And I thought they smelled bad on the outside."

        2. sloopyinca   13 years ago

          Jesus. The resemblance is striking.

      3. sloopyinca   13 years ago

        We also have two piglets coming as soon as they're weaned in 3 weeks. Both are females, so we'll have to come up with names for them as well.

        1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

          Maddow and Pelosi

          1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

            I said they were both female. Can't you read?

            1. Ted S.   13 years ago

              Dave Weigel and Andrew Sullivan?

        2. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          Piglets are insanely cute. We just saw some at a farm we went to with our youngest daughter.

          1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

            And one day they will taste fucking great.

            1. Brett L   13 years ago

              They taste fine from day 1.

            2. fish   13 years ago

              Unlike Maddow and Pelosi.

              1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                *BARF!*

                How fish (appropriately named given the nature of the comment) would you know how geriatric and manly tuna taste?

              2. Cdr Lytton   13 years ago

                Ow! I need some new nasal passages where the milk burned them.

                Note to self: don't drink milk while reading HyR comments.

          2. Paul.   13 years ago

            Piglets are insanely cute.

            And especially charming!

        3. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

          I think you should name one of the piglets Ms. Moham9f 9d b2 35 33 d4 04 e5 be 67

          [POST REDACTED BY US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE]
          [For more information please contact:
          U.S. Department of Justice
          10th Constitution Ave., NW
          Criminal Division, (Computer Crime Intellectual Property Section)
          John C. Keeney Building, Suite 600
          Washington, DC 20530]

          1. Banjos   13 years ago

            What the fuck?

            1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

              I guess you could name one Redacted.

            2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

              Well, I guess I'm not going to win the future anytime soon.

              1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                Did you do that as a joke, HM?

                1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

                  The scary thing is that you guys have to ask.

                  We are so fucked.

                  1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

                    Sorry, Mewhommodans are testy lot, and it looked pretty darn convincing. It also doesn't help with all the cheer leading emanating from both the WH and the State Dept.

                    Not to mention all the free speech posts about "cyber-thought-crime" and such so prevalent in EUR and CAN (so far UKR appears to be relatively immune to this, but some YooToob content is blocked there.)

          2. gaijin   13 years ago

            ^^hah!

          3. sloopyinca   13 years ago

            That's some crazy shit right there. We've decided to go with "The Kagan" and "Attorney General Janet Reno, Esquire". We are assuming, obviously, that their cuteness will wear off rapidly.

            1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

              The cuteness will wear off rapidly, otherwise, children would be perennially adorable.

              Cats, however, never suffer from this problem. -))))

              1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

                Not true.

                http://legacy-cdn.smosh.com/sm.....-cat-2.jpg
                http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_67xw....._cat-3.jpg

                1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

                  Continued.

                  http://www.maoxian.com/images/200706/elwood.jpg
                  http://www.lpenguin.com/wp-con.....-cat-1.jpg

          4. $park?   13 years ago

            Oh man, that is fucking hysterical.

        4. R C Dean   13 years ago

          A nice list of potential names here:

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad's_wives

          1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

            FTA: Aisha was six or seven years old when betrothed to Muhammad.[11][15][16] Traditional sources state that she stayed in her parents' home until the age of nine when the marriage was consummated with Muhammad, then 53, in Medina,[16][17][18][19] with the single exception of al-Tabari, who records that she was ten.

            Stay classy, prophet. At least here, it'll cost you your school teaching job and NFL cheerleader gig.

            1. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

              It'll at least cost you your cheerleading job. Unions rules differ in different districts as to how easy it is to fire a child molesting teacher.

    2. Rasilio   13 years ago

      Coulter?

      1. Paul.   13 years ago

        Too fat.

    3. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

      I would go with "Bacon" and "Bacon Jr."

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        I am partial to the name "Kevin" for pigs.

        1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

          How about dunphy1 and dunphy2

          1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

            Speaking of which, was he in any way affiliated with the South Park episode last night? He is a native, after all.

            1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

              "Native" just doesn't convey the fact that Dunphy invented Hawaii.

  13. A Serious Man   13 years ago

    Obama debate coach and advisor named Mao Zedong as her favorite political philosopher (along with Mother Teresea).

    1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      That's old news...

      or so I thought. Maybe I was thinking of someone else?

    2. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

      That's old news.

      Though it explains where they got the campaign slogan "Forward."

      1. hotsy totsy   13 years ago

        "Forward" with Great Leaps!

    3. JW   13 years ago

      Old news. Very old.

    4. Paul.   13 years ago

      Old news. Video of her with drymouth available upon request.

  14. Brett L   13 years ago

    As a courtesy to everyone in the Bigorati Pick'em League who may not read the board over there: From here on out I'm picking Eli and the NYG to win every game. At least this way when he fucks me for the 7-16th time, he'll suffer as well.

    1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      Did you miss again this week?

      1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        Ah, I see you, along with basically everyone, did. If it makes you feel better you still had 1 better than me this week. What a god awful weekend for me.

    2. Banjos   13 years ago

      I just want everyone who is losing to me to know that your well researched picks are losing to my random guesses.

      1. The Hammer   13 years ago

        That's how it works, dammit. You probably kick ass during March Madness pools, too, right?

        1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

          Forget that, I want to know Banjos ability to pick stocks!

      2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

        I don't really do any research, just the normal amount of football watching I normally would. I checked one game's injury report when it was a toss up, but that's it.

  15. hamilton   13 years ago

    Wow nice throwback Civ reference in the alt text

    1. Archduke Pantsfan   13 years ago

      It's a shoutout to the game Alpha Centauri

      1. Jerry on the road   13 years ago

        Never played AC, but Master of Orion II was a great game.

        1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

          Never played AC

          WAAAAHHHH?!?!?!?

          You need to get your ass on Good Old Games.com stat and rectify that.

          I play that game to this day.

          1. #   13 years ago

            It is indeed amazing.

          2. John   13 years ago

            Thanks for the link. That site is amazing. And I just bought the old Baldur's Gate. My wife hates you now. But my future divorce lawyer and I thank you.

          3. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

            Ooooh...they have Caesar III!

            1. Brett L   13 years ago

              One of my favs.

            2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

              You're a Caesar fan? I bought all the games in the city building series.

              1. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

                I played it on Gametap once upon a time, but I got sick of paying monthly. I be downloadin' it now.

              2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

                I only ever got as far as Valencia on the non-war track, though (never played the war track). I was so pleased to have beaten Lugdunum, though. The first time I played that city, everyone got eaten by wolves.

                1. Brett L   13 years ago

                  I can't remember now. I'll have to buy it and play again. Its been 15 years and several build shit up games ago.

  16. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Two idiots involved in road rage incident. DA inexplicably chooses not to press charges. Perhaps it's because one of the idiots was a cop.

    1. Brett L   13 years ago

      Ah yes, discharging a gun at a person who just attempted vehicular homicide by running over your motorcycle with you on it is unreasonable!

      Sommerville, 29, was accused of firing several shots at the tires of a Nissan truck driven by Parker, a detention deputy who was 25 at the time. Sommerville, who at the time had a concealed weapons permit, was on a motorcycle.

      Parker, whose girlfriend and infant son were in the truck, was accused of swerving into Sommerville's lane before colliding with his motorcycle.

  17. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

    "The anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act was slapped down as a violation of the right to equal protection by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals."

    No, the 2nd Circuit declared Section 3, the federal definition of marriage, invalid. In states with a same-sex definition of marriage, the feds now have to recognize those marriages for the purpose of federal benefits (tax breaks, etc., etc.).

    The parts of the law still standing say that a state with SSM cannot force its definition on other states.

    1. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

      Opinion here:

      http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/de.....te_opn.pdf

  18. Brett L   13 years ago

    Being a heartless libertarian, I was rooting for failure.

  19. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

    I love hunting.

    http://forum.finsandfur.net/in.....ic=16421.0
    http://forum.finsandfur.net/in.....ic=16422.0

  20. Archduke Pantsfan   13 years ago

    Gary Bettman flat out refuses NHLPA counter-offer.
    "We're not even speaking the same language".

    Maybe if he learned French?

    1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

      Swedish? We have a lot of those in Detroy-it on the Wings...

    2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      BWA HA HA HA!

      French?! Pah-tooey!

    3. Restoras   13 years ago

      Bettman is a douche. That is all.

  21. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    DC Cop can't decide whether he wants to be Hugh Grant or Lorenzo Gilyard. Either way, DC is safer now that he's off the streets and going to trial for attempted murder.

    1. fish   13 years ago

      "The two people who had been in the store then met up with others and drove off in a mint-green Chrysler 300, court documents say.

      A felony offense in it's own right. Chrysler...just go away....please.

      1. The Hammer   13 years ago

        BUT, BUT, BUT, EMINEM AND CLINT EASTWOOD LOVE CHRYSLER!!!

      2. sloopyinca   13 years ago

        Oh, I'm pretty sure that was an aftermarket paint job. By the way, whatever happened to classic pimp cars? They used to be a whole lot cooler than the 300's or the Escalades of today.

        Exhibit A.

        although

        this display of trucknutz is worthy of respect.

    2. Ted S.   13 years ago

      They're actually putting a cop on trial for attempted murder??

  22. Mike M.   13 years ago

    Gallup now has Romney leading Obama by seven points nationally among likely voters, though that doesn't necessarily address big regional variations (guess who is leading by a lot in the deep South).

    Sounds to me like someone is desperately trying to rationalize.

    Gallup is a professional and well-respected polling organization; one of the oldest in the country in fact. They have been at this a long time. You honestly don't think that they know how to do proper methodology in order to prevent one region from dominating a particular sample? Please.

    1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

      You know who else did well in the Deeeeeeep South?....

      1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

        Reagan?

      2. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

        Ron Jeremy?

      3. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

        Jimmy Carter?

        1. Art Vandelay   13 years ago

          El Cid?

      4. Paul.   13 years ago

        George Wallace?

      5. Ice Nine   13 years ago

        Sherman?

      6. sloopyinca   13 years ago

        Roald Amundsen?

        1. Pro Libertate   13 years ago

          Okay, I laughed.

        2. Paul.   13 years ago

          Yeah that was pretty good.

      7. Restoras   13 years ago

        Bandit?

    2. Gladstone   13 years ago

      I think he's refering to the fact that if Obama wins the swing states then he wins the Electoral College.

      That said a 7 point lead is quite big and I don't think such a gap can save enough swing states. Benjamin Harrison and George W. Bush lost the popular vote narrowly. Oh and Rutherford Hayes only lost the popular vote by 3 points.

  23. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

    Lost ANOTHER comment and had to log in again.

    That's it. No contribution to the Reason this year. Fuck you. Fix H'n'R or you can just get all your contributions from Big Bird from here on out.

  24. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

    We need to pay for the War on Drugs via our taxes AND our health insurance premiums.

    [Kentucky] State regulators said this week they're working with private insurance companies and Medicaid managers to make sure health insurance plans help cover the cost of urine tests required under House Bill 1, the so-called "pill mill bill."

  25. protefeed   13 years ago

    What's the fastest we've gotten a probe--150,000 mph or so? I think we'd better improve upon that dramatically or there's no point in launching one.

    It would make no sense to send one now, because faster and faster probes would be developed, each of which would get there faster than the ones previously launched.

    Until you get one that can travel at a significant fraction of the speed of light, best to wait.

    1. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

      Hey! If Al Gore had that attitude, we wouldn't be communicating with each other on a series of tubes!

      "A journey of 1000 miles begins with a single nose to the grindstone!"

      Who's with me? Come on! Let's goooooo!!

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        Excelsior!

      2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        **EXCELSIOR!**

      3. Killazontherun   13 years ago

        If Al Gore got his way, there would be about a dozen servers on the entire planet.

  26. John   13 years ago

    Governor Romney's argument is, we're not fixed, so fire him and put me in," said Clinton. "It is true we're not fixed. When President Obama looked into the eyes of that man who said in the debate, I had so much hope four years ago and I don't now, I thought he was going to cry. Because he knows that it's not fixed."

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/.....54893.html

    Damn does Clinton know how to kick someone in the nuts.

    1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      I have to admit, he still knows how to turn a phrase.

      1. John   13 years ago

        That is just brutal to Obama. He is killing him out there while still claiming to be a loyal soldier. And there is not a damned thing Obama can do about it.

        1. Brett L   13 years ago

          As I said upthread, the only thing worse than having Billy Jeff as an enemy is thinking he's a loyal ally.

  27. Matrix   13 years ago

    Victim of Colorado theater shooting speaks out against guns

    Thinks law abiding citizens owning guns does very little to stop crime.

    1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

      That's actually true so long as the law-abiding citizens aren't allowed to take their guns to the places where the crimes occur.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      Dude's just pissed no one has passed "Stephen's Law" yet. Or do you only get one of those if you die?

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        Those eponymous statutes are granted when the victim assumes room temperature.

        1. Dr. Frankenstein   13 years ago

          What about the Brady Bill?

        2. Kaptious Kristen   13 years ago

          What if you keep your thermostat at 98.7?

    3. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      The very people who tell me I should carry a gun to stop shootings refuse to entertain even the most basic measures to prevent those shootings from happening in the first place.

      So how exactly is the great and magical background check supposed to prevent a man with no criminal record or history of violence, from getting a firearm, or several, and shooting up a movie theater? Because that's what happened.

      Down off the cross, return to your life, quit shilling.

      1. Loki   13 years ago

        Down off the cross, return to your life, quit shilling.

        But how else is a talentless loser supposed to get their 15 minutes of fame? It's not like he's Paris Hilton and can rely on his daddy's fortune and a sex tape to get famous.

      2. JW   13 years ago

        So how exactly is the great and magical background check supposed to prevent a man with no criminal record or history of violence, from getting a firearm, or several, and shooting up a movie theater?

        A few more laws oughta do it.

  28. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

    I have approximately 58,625 years before a probe can reach Alpha Centauri, assuming an average velocity of 50,000 mph. Tack on another 4.24 years before a signal from the star system could be received by Earth.

    1. Loki   13 years ago

      You might want to increase that speed a bit. I don't have my Orbital Mechanics book with me, and unfortunately I can't remember how to calculate escape velocity off the top of my head, but that sounds a little low for solar escape velocity. Or maybe not, Voyager 1's current velocity relative to the sun is 38,127 mph, and Voyager 2's is 34,537 mph.

      1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

        Look, we're gonna have to figure out how to put a man on the moon (again) before we can try any of that shit.

        1. Restoras   13 years ago

          I doubt we can figure out how to do that again.

          1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

            I hear we're less than 20 years away.

            Seriously, who else does it piss off that we can't develop the tech with computers to do something we managed with slide rules and reams of paper over 40 years ago? It's like Idiocracy was a documentary from the future.

            1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

              We could do it again tommorrow if we wanted. The difference between now and then is safety. Back then we were willing to take a few risks with the life of your favorite mailbox owner. Today, they want it 99% safe before anyone's allowed to fly, and they don't care of that costs 5 trillion.

              1. Loki   13 years ago

                Unfortunatly, ^this^. NASA is a bunch of whiney safety obsessed pussies now. Of course it doesn't help that back then they had the political support of the vast majority of the country. Now anytime an accident occurs like Challenger or Columbia you get the obligatory "why are we wasting money on this* when there's so many problems to solve on Earf!!11!!!!1!!" idiots.

                *You could argue that space travel, or at least the routine business of shuttling astronauts to/ from the ISS should be privatized, and I'd agree, but that's a different argument.

                1. robc   13 years ago

                  Actually, its the right argument, as the next moon landing will be private.

              2. robc   13 years ago

                We could do it again tommorrow if we wanted.

                Really? with what vehicle?

                1. Brett L   13 years ago

                  Well, tomorrow is fast, but if we still manufactured Saturn Vs, SpaceX could throw together a capsule with modern avionics (astronomics?) in less than a year.

      2. SKR   13 years ago

        At that speed it would only take about 71k years. sounds great c.c

  29. Jersey Patriot   13 years ago

    We are ever closer to my dream outcome: big electoral college vote one way and big popular vote the other. Go Go Gadget Legitimacy Crisis!

    1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

      I've got it. Take this map and give Romney Virginia, Iowa and Nevada. 269-269, assuming a district in Maine doesn't go his way. Then it goes to the house, where each state's delegation gets one vote. Romney would win that most likely. The fun would be if Team Blue holds the Senate, who would be tasked with choosing the VP.

      Anyone want to see a Romney/Biden administration? How about a Romney/Obama admin? That would be fucking awesome.

      1. Zeezrom   13 years ago

        It would be like that episode of the Munsters where Herman and Grandpa had a big fight and divided the house in two by painting a fat white line down the middle.

        1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

          Don't you mean that Happy Days episode where Ralph Malph and Potsie Webber did the same in their college apartment?

          1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

            I thought it was Three's Company.

          2. The Hammer   13 years ago

            They did it on Saved By the Bell:The College Years, too. And every other sitcom from 1965-1995. Kinda surprised Friends didn't work it in somehow.

      2. Spoonman.   13 years ago

        Goddamn that would be fun. They wouldn't get any bullshit legislation passed for months.

      3. robc   13 years ago

        Senate can only choose from amongst top 2 vote getters for VP slot, so Romney/Obama isnt an option.

        1. The Hammer   13 years ago

          Besides, Andrew Sullivan would just suicide-bomb Romney within a week or two.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            Not if Paul Ryan promises to appoint Sarah Palin as his veep in anything happens to Romney.

    2. Caleb Turberville   13 years ago

      That's it. We have to tuck tail between our legs and go back to British Monarchy and admit our republican experiment failed.

      Canadians are going to act very smugly when this happens, but I don't blame them.

      1. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

        Act smugly, because in a particular election the federal legislative body decides on the chief executive? The Canadian Parliament does this all the time.

        I don't know the "popular vote totals" of the various Canadian parties, but I wouldn't be surprised if sometimes the Parliamentary majority goes to a party with a popular minority - perhaps even short of a plurality - and the winning party gets to select the executive anyway.

        So they can go back to their maple syrup farms and take their smugness with them.

        1. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

          Wait, you were replying to the electoral v. popular scenario. Same basic response.

        2. Gladstone   13 years ago

          I don't know the "popular vote totals" of the various Canadian parties, but I wouldn't be surprised if sometimes the Parliamentary majority goes to a party with a popular minority - perhaps even short of a plurality - and the winning party gets to select the executive anyway.

          It has happened once in 1896.

          In 1957 and 1979 the party with fewer votes won more seats but not a majority. In the latter election the winning party fell just short of a majority despite a 5 percent margin. In both of these elections this was because the Liberals racked up huge majorities in Quebec but the Conservatives racked up narrow wins in Ontario.

          1. Gladstone   13 years ago

            In terms of popular vote the only times a party has won a majority of the popular vote since WWI was in 1940, 1958 and 1984.

  30. np   13 years ago

    In terms of space travel and colonizing other planets, I think we really need to move beyond conventional rocket propulsion. This may sound crazy, but I really do think we need something like or beyond warp, not mass accelerating force. To clarify I mean something along the lines of bending space, much like how gravity can, so that we move without actually overcoming the inertia of our mass but pulling space around us.

    1. Trespassers W   13 years ago

      You should send a letter to your nearest physics department.

    2. Loki   13 years ago

      Already on it.

  31. np   13 years ago

    Dunno much about the Free State project (though interested), when I came across this today:

    Dems Target State Rep Mark Warden, Free State Project Participant

    1. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      The outcome of this race could show whether conservative-leaning districts like this one are "in play" for New Hampshire Democrats, as well as whether the Free State Project's unique brand of conservatism has staying power among normal New Hampshire voters.

      Hear that, libertarians? You're all just a bunch of conservatives in denial! Get back to thumping your Bibles!

      1. Coeus   13 years ago

        The outcome of this race could show whether conservative-leaning districts like this one are "in play" for New Hampshire Democrats,

        The locusts have come.

  32. Loki   13 years ago

    Greek police are skeeving out their co-citizens by developing close ties to the nativist, bigoted Golden Dawn party.

    This is not going to end well for anyone.

    1. np   13 years ago

      Maybe there was a hidden meaning in the Nazi cosplay protests when Merkel visited..

    2. T   13 years ago

      Ahh, the Golden Dawn will just degenerate into opium use and schism.

  33. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

    WTF is wrong with Team Blue?

    Soup kitchen in Ryan photo op losing donors

    People are withholding donations because they let Paul Ryan have his picture taken doing dishes.

    1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

      And you're surprised by this? The left isn't compassionate. Sure they want to help the poor, but they sure as fuck don't want it done with their own money if there are political points to score or rich people to rob.

      1. robc   13 years ago

        And what political philosophy supposedly doesnt care for others?

        1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

          Well, charity is collectivist, so I'm sure Suderman will run an article condemning Ryan's act.

          1. The Hammer   13 years ago

            How is charity collectivist?

            1. Trespassers W   13 years ago

              Dude, don't even start. Suffice it to say that Tulpa is a real outside-the-box thinker.

    2. Anonymous Coward   13 years ago

      the Mahoning County St. Vincent De Paul Society is losing donors as a result of the photo.

      Tulpa, don't you see? They've been tainted by being in contact with the Romney/Ryan/Rand/Koch/Hitler Axis of Evil. It's not about feeding the poor and hungry. It's about the purity of the TEAM Blue donor's souls is at stake if they continue to give to a soup kitchen that would consort with one of the Anathema (Republicans).

    3. JW   13 years ago

      Party before people.

      It's really that simple.

    4. The Hammer   13 years ago

      At least Yahoo is still better than HuffPo. HuffPo's headline was "Soup Kitchen in Trouble for Ryan Visit."

  34. R C Dean   13 years ago

    A little detail on the dog shooting:

    According to Morales, the officer said, "He trotted up to me after I turned the corner, came to my feet and I shot him."

    Morales said the officer described how he told the pit bull to get back, and when he didn't, he stepped back and fired his service revolver. However, the officer admitted to Morales the pit bull never growled at him.

    Naturally, the supervisor is looking into it, and we can confidently expect that nothing else will happen.

    1. R C Dean   13 years ago

      Let me just say, as an owner, that if an adult pit bull decides to attack you, it will come full speed, you will be knocked down, and unless you hit the brain or spinal column, it will keep coming after you shoot.

      So there's no question at all, in my mind, that this dog was not aggressive.

    2. JW   13 years ago

      the officer described how he told the pit bull to get back, and when he didn't, he stepped back and fired his service revolver.

      We could avoid these tragedies from ever happening, if all LEOs received language training in all of the major breeds.

    3. Loki   13 years ago

      Morales said the officer described how he told the pit bull to get back

      I'm shocked that didn't work given pit bull's well established ability to understand conversational English. /sarc

      1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

        Polish immigrants learned English just fine back in the 1910s. Why can't dogs do it today?

        1. sloopyinca   13 years ago

          How do you stop a Polish cavalry charge?

          Stop the carousel.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            Panzers worked just fine in '39.

  35. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    This was recently posted in the AM Links thread. laugh at your leisure:

    Dunphy (the real one)| 10.18.12 @ 2:35PM |#|?|filternamelinkcustom

    if you look over this thread and others, notice how many posts involve sarcasmic referencing me, parodying me, etc. heck, if you do a text search for "dunphy" you often will find my name in his posts more than total posts made by me. i don't do this to him (this is a rare exception) because i am not a troll. trolls are as trolls do. note, JUST in this thread and in others.

    iow, sarcasmic, get a life. i'll continue to post , not troll. you can continue to troll, but it just makes you look like an obsessed ridiculous shadow of a person

    trolling is lame. get over it

    reply to this

    1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      I saw. I laughed then.

  36. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

    Keep the stupid coming.

    Illegal to take free online courses in MI:
    Way to go Michigan

    1. Mad Scientist   13 years ago

      Minnesota, not Michigan.

      1. Clich? Bandit   13 years ago

        reading comprehension is not my strong suit...they both start with M

  37. The Hammer   13 years ago

    http://www.tennessean.com/apps.....ck_check=1

    Al Gore's former paper endorses Romney. The comments are delicious:

    Blaine Mcclister ? Subscribe ? Top Commenter ? Volunteer State
    Newspaper should not be endorsing anyone. They are supposed to be a non biased entity and report the news no matter who it makes look good or bad.

    They all pretty much boil down to "WAAAAAAHHH!!!"

    1. The Hammer   13 years ago

      And this is just gold:


      Charisse Winters Kulp ? East Nashville High School
      Canceling my subscription.
      Reply ? 23 ? Like ? Follow Post ? 11 hours ago

      John Smith ? Top Commenter ? Works at CNC/Tool and Die
      Charisse Winters Kulp: "Canceling my subscription."

      The tennessean shows it's true color. RACIST! RACIST! RACIST!

      Obviously sarcasm, right? Later in that sub-thread:

      Jim Goldstein ? Subscribe ? Top Commenter ? University of Missouri?St. Louis
      Not sure if it's racist or just plain ignorant.

      1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

        Perhaps we should introduce the Tennesseean comments section to our drinking game.

  38. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

    Luh-loh: Mrs. Kim Jong Un hasn't been seen in public for 40 days. Looks like the honeymoon, at the very least, is over.

  39. JW   13 years ago

    Aaaand into the filter with you, cunt.

  40. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Most domestic dogs understand simple commands.

    [citation required for the command coming from a stranger]

    Maybe the cop forgot to say "please" as the killer dog was lunging for his throat.

    Funny, his report didn't say that.

    Stupid cop!

    Finally, something we can agree upon.

  41. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

    Responsible dog owners train their animals to recognize and obey police.

  42. Coeus   13 years ago

    You forgot the hth.

    hth

  43. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    **golf clap**

  44. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Drone attack victims:
    http://fkpolitics.files.wordpr.....ictims.jpg
    http://thinkpress.files.wordpr.....154701.jpg

    What's your point?

  45. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Bad doggy!
    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TMHw.....ttacks.jpg

  46. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Is yours more vicious than this one?
    http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/t.....m4SCMp.jpg
    Guess who it works for?

  47. sloopyinca   13 years ago

    Is that pit bull defending it's owner's property? I know this dog isn't.

  48. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

    Yeah, doesn't sound like the best anti-shooting argument I can think of.

  49. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

    You laugh, but it's true. It comes down to getting the dog to associate the smell of donuts with submissive urination.

  50. The Hammer   13 years ago

    What is your point, dumbass? All dogs should be pre-emptively murdered because you can find 4 instances of dogs hurting people? If that's your logic, all police should be put down first.

  51. Coeus   13 years ago

    Approximately 24% of human deaths involved unrestrained dogs off of their owners' property

    Approximately 58% of human deaths involved unrestrained dogs on their owners' property

    Yep. Sure. 82% of deaths are caused by unrestrained dogs. Then with your 25% of fatal attacks caused by chained dogs that makes...102.5% of all human deaths are caused by dogs.

    Impressive.

  52. R C Dean   13 years ago

    So, you're in favor of shooting dogs that aren't aggressive? Shoot on sight? You, Tulpa, and dunphy should get together and have an occifer safety party.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Celebrate Independence Day by Insulting a Politician

J.D. Tuccille | 7.4.2025 7:00 AM

Independence Day Reminds Us You Can Be American by Choice

Billy Binion | 7.4.2025 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!