Remember When Barack Obama Complained About the White House Running Deficits That Were Just Too Dang High?
At tonight's presidential debate, you can expect Mitt "Cut the Spending" Romney to criticize President Obama for allowing the federal debt to balloon while in office. It's become such a common criticism of the president that most won't think anything of it: Obama has always been at war with low deficits, and the GOP has always attacked him for it.
But flashback a few years to the 2008 debate, and the roles don't seem quite as familiar. Then, Barack Obama, the Democratic Party's choice to succeed a two-term Republican president who had presided over an enormous increase in the debt, was frequently on the offense when it came to the nation's sky high debt and deficits. He would say things like this to his GOP rival, John McCain:
I think it's important just to remember a little bit of history. When George Bush came into office, we had surpluses. And now we have half-a-trillion-dollar deficit annually.
When George Bush came into office, our debt -- national debt was around $5 trillion. It's now over $10 trillion. We've almost doubled it. And so while it's true that nobody's completely innocent here, we have had over the last eight years the biggest increases in deficit spending and national debt in our history. And Senator McCain voted for four out of five of those George Bush budgets.
And this:
Now, the last thing I think we have to focus on is a little bit of history, just so that we understand what we're doing going forward.
When President Bush came into office, we had a budget surplus and the national debt was a little over $5 trillion. It has doubled over the last eight years.
And we are now looking at a deficit of well over half a trillion dollars.
So one of the things that I think we have to recognize is pursuing the same kinds of policies that we pursued over the last eight years is not going to bring down the deficit. And, frankly, Sen. McCain voted for four out of five of President Bush's budgets.
We've got to take this in a new direction, that's what I propose as president.
Here's some more recent history. Since taking office, Obama has run deficits of over a trillion dollars every single year. Total federal debt, in turn, has ballooned to $16 trillion. At this point, the debt has increased more in Obama's single term than in Bush's two. Obama's primary response has been to offer a $4 trillion deficit plan that "virtually no serious budget analyst" believes will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion, and which consists mostly of of budget gimmicks and tax hikes. On the federal budget, Obama didn't take us in a new direction. He took us in the same direction that his predecessor had gone, even faster.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Mittens: My opponent has run up deficits! We must cut them! I am the man to do it!
Teh Presuhdent: LOL!
I refuse to watch or listen to the drivel.
Obama has not run a budget deficit. He would have had to have signed a budget to do that. He has run a continuing resolution deficit. And that is different and better than a budget deficit.
Dude, you forgot to change your handle to PB.
I will be doing something much more interesting than watching the "debate"...letting my parent's incontinet dog piss on my shoes, helping with household chores and visiting the desolation that Rockford, IL has become.
I'm gonna be seducing my girlfriend after she makes me dinner.
Seems to me like he's upheld this promise by submitting budgets that no one, not even members of his party, would vote for, and by avoiding having any real budget resolution passed, just Continuing Resolution spending authority.
I mean, sure, there may still be huge deficits, even larger than before, but at least he's gotten right on that problem of having Senators on the record voting for those deficits.
Harry Reid did that for him. That is really the only power he has left in Congress; the power to keep Democrats from having to make tough votes. When you think about it, it makes sense considering he was Senator "Present" before becoming President.
Booooosh stands astride history like a colossus.
That's what President Barack H. Bush has done on most things.
Someone on staff should remind Suderman that what Obama said in 2008 is irrelevant.
"let's look at a little history" is what the Great One counts on.
He sure ain't going to point voters attention toward all the rest of history that includes his screwups. He's a caricature of the old joke about "How do you know when a politician is lying?" "His lips are moving."