Ron Paul

Ron Paul Roundup: Continuing Delegate Wrangling, Making Peace with the GOP?, and Gearing up for a Weekend of Pre-RNC Rallying


As the Republican National Convention looms in Tampa next week, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) continues to be the only Romney opponent still making relevant news, largely because debates and negotiations over how many of his delegates will be properly seated in Tampa continue.

I blogged yesterday about a deal on a couple of the contested states, Louisiana and Massachusetts, in which Paul wins some but loses some he would have had had the party establishment not been fighting him in the first place. 

Ron Paul's rEVOLution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired

NPR had a long account of that deal, hitting the heart of why Romney's people are even nickle-and-diming the Paul delegates if the nomination is Romney's:

Pro-Paul delegations from Iowa, Nevada and Minnesota have already been credentialed, without challenge, for the convention.

Romney and the RNC had been pursuing a legal strategy that appeared designed to prevent Paul from coming into the convention with "the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five or more states."

Why? Reaching that threshold, according to the party rulebook, would allow Paul delegates to place the longtime congressman's name into nomination during the convention, and the candidate to make a speech. Paul has not sought to be nominated from the floor.

More Paul delegate issues are still in the air as I write. While the Maine challenge–in which two local GOPers are trying to get a Paul-controlled delegation unseated because of alleged irregularities at the state nominating convention–is still being debated, sources within the Maine delegation assure me they are not amenable to any deal (especially a rumored one that would make the delegation half-Romney, half-Paul) and are going to Tampa and will fight to be seated no matter what.

In other Paul delegate news, Huffington Post reports that the RNC's Rules Committee considered, and rejected, a rules change to raise the number of state delegations one must control to be nominated for president from the floor from five to 10, allegedly to make triple-super-sure that Paul can't be nominated for president officially at the RNC next week. Excerpt:

the deliberations sigaled that the Republican Party and Mitt Romney's presidential campaign remain nervous to some degree about the potential for Paul supporters to disrupt the carefully scripted program for the four-day convention next week….

The Paul campaign told CNN that its count indicates that 373 of the 2,286 delegates support Paul. Some of those delegates are bound by state rules to vote for Romney. However, the state rules binding delegates to the presidential nominee do not apply to vice president, leaving open the possibility that Paul delegates could nominate an alternative to Romney's running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) from the floor.

But the Paul insider said that the Texas congressman does not want to be nominated for vice president.

The Romney campaign reached an agreement with the Paul campaign to seat contested delegates in Massachusetts and Louisiana this week, but delegates in Oregon remain contested. 

*Some of the (very complicated) details of the Oregon delegate challenge.

*The Minnesota delegation is still for Paul, and happy about it.

*Christian Science Monitor writes of Paul activists who think all these delegate deals are raw deals.

*The lawsuit–not supported by the campaign itself–trying to get all RNC delegates declared "unbound" (with the dream they would then put Paul over the top even now) is struggling for life against a judge who might be prepared to dismiss it with prejudice any minute now. I wrote about the suit in June for the New York Times and wrote about an earlier version of the suit being tossed earlier this month. More of the filings from the suit's twists and turns available here.

*Jim Antle at Daily Caller, in an article quoting me, writes that "Paul activists uneasily embrace GOP." Money quote about a very complicated situation, one that will by no means be ending in Tampa next week:

Republican leaders have an incentive to resolve the impasse: they want to keep the convention running smoothly without any disruption from the Paul delegates. There is also much at stake for the Paul forces. If young Paulites make the GOP gathering their 1968 Democratic National Convention, they will endanger all the progress they have made within the party.

But if Paul backers come away from Tampa empty-handed, it will bring doubts many of them still have about working within the GOP into the open and potentially divide the movement.

*In other Paul news, even as Ron himself seems shut out of the RNC itself except for a possible video tribute and a speaking berth for his son, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), a bunch of his grassroots fans are holding a multi-day festival of Paulian ideas, for which they have now turned "Paul" into an acronym–P.A.U.L. ("People Awakening and United for Liberty") (You try it!) 

Ron himself is not scheduled to appear at that one, though Paul-inclined intellectuals and entertainers from late-period Misfits vocalist Michael Graves to Meltdown author Tom Woods to antiwar radio host Scott Horton, are. Even politicians are showing up–most prominently Libertarian Party presidential and vice presidential candidates Gary Johnson and Judge Jim Gray.

*Paul himself is holding a big rally the day before the RNC begins at Tampa's Sundome. Speakers run the full Paul gamut from the purely political, like Michigan Rep. Justin Amash, to the decidedly non-political such as Mises Institute founder and anarcho-Rothbardian Lew Rockwell.

*Adam Kokesh of Veterans for Ron Paul now says a planned march on the RNC in Tampa might not happen after all, out of general distaste for the way he sees the campaign treating the grassroots.

*And the Paul campaign's own website reminds you: even after Ron Paul is no longer on the political scene, it was always all about the message.

My book, Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired.

NEXT: 9/11 Trials Could Be Delayed Four Years

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. This life-long Republican now hates the Republican Party more than he hates the Democrat Party. The only possible advantage of a Romney win is the potential for the Left Wingers to end their hypocritical silence over the gov’t’s unConstitutional violations of civil rights. Because “conservatives” are so inconceivably stupid that they are fretting over some numbskull saying some nonsense about rape and pregnancy rather than the fact that an Iraq War Veteran is now in the process of being “disappeared” right in front of everyone’s eyes.


  2. ^^What I meant to say is that conservatives are too stupid to realize that the government has now reached the “police state” stage. They’re still working under the “the government will be good again, once we elect the right people” paradigm.

  3. ot but wtf

    great and civil debate between dan savage and some protraditionalantigaymarriage guy

    but for CHRIST’S SAKE

    dan, in listing the contradictions in the bible, trots out the ridiculous (but oft used line amongst liberals) about how the bible says “thou shalt not kill” and then mentions all the killing god does or asks people to do

    for the MILLIONTH time, the proper translation is “thou shalt not MURDER” iow unlawfully kill

    there is ZERO debate about this from scholars, but you will still constantly hear people (mostly liberals) trotting out “but god says thou shalt not kill”

    which is not what the bible says…..-children/

    1. How many angels would you say can dance on the head of a pin?

    2. That’s true but that leaves you with the uncomfortable reality that murder apparently doesn’t include cases where God commands the killings, even those of women and children following a battle.

  4. The Romney campaign reached an agreement with the Paul campaign to seat contested delegates in Massachusetts and Louisiana this week, but delegates in Oregon remain contested.

    Wait, why is the Romney campaign in charge if seating delegates? Doesn’t that seem like a conflict of interests?

  5. I believe that they also got official support of Audit the Fed into the party platform. Of course, party platforms mean basically nothing.

  6. Every Ron Paul delegate should hide a cloth “Where’s Ron Paul?” banner under their shirt, and whip it out at an appropriate time.
    What are the goons gonna do, frog march 300+ delegates off the floor under the tv cameras? Yeah, I hope they do.

  7. Does a hurricane emergency allow the Paul delegates to do any cool procedural things? (Such as vote to make Paul win the nomination)

  8. I am a big fan of Ron Paul (but even bigger fan of Gary Johnson), but the convention can’t come soon enough for me, so that we can get beyond the daily “what’s happening to Paul delegates today” updates… It’s getting tiresome.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.