Britain's Government Continues to Get Pulled Apart By Internal Squabbles
As was noted on Reason 24/7, David Cameron's coalition government is facing additional strains after failed House of Lords reform promoted some of the strongest calls for dissolution of the government in months. The defeat is bad news for the Conservative's partners in coalition, the Liberal Democrats, who included House of Lords reform in their 2010 election manifesto. The Labour opposition has seized on the coalition's rift, calling it a humiliation.
The Liberal Democrats had been pushing for legislation that would have made 80 percent of Britain's upper chamber directly elected. However, the bill didn't make it to a vote as it failed to pass consideration by the House of Commons, where Members vote on whether to debate abill. As it is the House of Lords is made up of a mixture of hereditary peers, Religious officials, and those who impress the right Prime Ministers.
While it might seem obvious to most people that the Bishop of Ripon and Leeds should not by virtue of his profession get to vote on legislation, the issue remains contentious in British politics. Nick Clegg, the Leader of the Liberal Democrats and Deputy Prime Minister, has called for his party to oppose boundary review legislation in response to Conservatives killing House of Lords reform.
With reform of the House of Lords dead supporters of both the Tories and the Liberal Democrats have expressed their support for calling a general election before 2015.
If one examines the latest polling data it is hard to see why the Tories would support another general election. The coalition government has been controversial. The so-called "austerity" program, the tuition fees fiasco, and the phone hacking scandal have all contributed to a dwindling amount of support for the government. The liberal democrats who are traditionally considered center-left are hemorrhaging support while the Tories are struggling to contain a Labour resurgence. In the unlikely event of another hung parliament the Liberal Democrats would be more easily persuaded to join with Labour than risk another partnership with the Tories.
Were a general election be called there is a very good chance that the next Prime Minister would be Ed Miliband, a man who takes pride in the label "socialist". While the coalition government's "austerity" program is a bit of a joke it is at least a refreshing exception to the rhetoric heard in mainland Europe where more centralized control and bailouts are being put forward as realistic and serious solutions to the euro-crisis.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The Liberal Democrats had been pushing for legislation that would have made 80 percent of Britain's upper chamber directly elected.
Frankly, I fail to see why anyone would think that having more elected officials in the upper chamber would result in an increase in liberty. If anything, I would bet that it leads to a decrease (to the extent the House of Lords is even still relevant; I don't know, and find it hard to care).
Who the fuck cares about actual liberty? The LDs are outright pinkos. They're part of the 'democracy=freedom" crowd.
Because, you know, the fact that the authoritarian thugs in power were elected and not appointed is such a comforting one.
If any of you guys are familiar with Limetree politics, you'll know that on Limetree Island, the practical differences between the parties is so miniscule that they make slightly variant factions within a single party in the US, even the Democrats, look like opposing factions in a heated war of ideology.
They're totalitarian assholes. Fuck them.
*Are so miniscule.
Where the hell's my coffee?
Minuscule.
The sooner the coalition dies and takes Cameron with it the better. The only hope for Britain lies in Boris Johnson...and I hope he fails. Why waste another good person on Britain? Burn in hell Britain.
While he has totally awesome hair it is pretty depressing that someone who endorsed Obama is their only hope.
While the coalition government's "austerity" program is a bit of a joke it is at least a refreshing exception to the rhetoric heard in mainland Europe where more centralized control and bailouts are being put forward as realistic and serious solutions to the euro-crisis.
It would be hard to disagree with this more.
Britain's austerity program is more centralized control and bailouts plus added taxes....the fact that it is called "austerity" only hurts austerity. Better to let it commit suicide under its real name which is Keynesian economics.
The difference between Tories, Lib-Dems and Labor explained by how they answer one simple question:
How fast should we travel to socialist economic ruin?
Labor - 8003 miles per hour
Lib dems - 8002 miles per hour
Tories - 8003 miles per hour but we will call it "austerity".
And they will get there by driving on the wrong damn side of the road. Limeys!
lol are they all bought and paid for like the US?
http://www.Goin-Private.tk