It's easy enough to find registries full of names of people who have been convicted of crimes, including such acts as pissing in a parking lot. You can even find online databases of mugshots where you can vote on the hotness of the accused (go find 'em yourself). But now we have a registry of people who were convicted of crimes they didn't commit, before finally proving their innocence. The National Registry of Exonerations is a joint project of the University of Michigan Law School and the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University School of Law featuring "all known exonerations in the United States since 1989."
Right now, the registry features 901 exonerations for convictions ranging in seriousness from drug possession to murder. The sentences hanging over the heads of these innocents included everything up to and including the death penalty. The registry is browsable both in summary format and in a detailed view, by name, crime, sentence, year of conviction, year of exoneration, whether or not DNA evidence was involved, and other helpful factors for parsing a list of terrible errors.
Among the entries currently featured on the site are the following:
Frank O'Connell State: CA Date of Exoneration: 6/11/2012 In 1985, in Los Angeles County, California, Frank O'Connell was convicted of murder based on eyewitness testimony and an ambiguous dying declaration by the victim. He was exonerated in 2012 after the key eyewitness admitted he could never recognize the killer, and it was discovered that police hid evidence of other suspects and improperly influenced the identification procedure. [Photograph: Diane Bladecki]
David Lee Gavitt State: MI Date of Exoneration: 6/5/2012 In 1986, David Lee Gavitt was sentenced to life without parole for arson and murder, after barely escaping a home fire that killed his wife and two young daughters. On June 5, 2012, he was exonerated after new analysis of evidence from the fire found no proof that it was deliberately set. Experts concluded that the original investigators had relied on a mix of junk science and "arson myths," and that one investigator misread the results of the tests he performed.
Yeah … Listing the names and stories of those who rotted behind bars by mistake doesn't exactly give them back those lost years. But it at least pays tribute to what they went through — and gives them someplace to which to point if they ever need to explain those missing chunks of their lives.
The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Affects Graham Chapman's Upper Class Boring Pompous Voice
The fact that those people were exonerated shows that the system worked. Justice takes time, and police being human make the occasional mistake. For most people that interact with the criminal justice system, the more they interact with it, the more they approve of it.
"Well...well...as the Conservative candidate I just drone on and on and on and on without letting anyone else get a word in edgeways, until I start to froth at the mouth and fall over backwards."
The chance that innocent people will be exonerated is closer to zerro than one percent. This is just the tip of an iceberg that has ruined far too many lives. The problem is the American people who trust authorities who hide evidence and use junk science to frame the innocent.
police hid evidence of other suspects and improperly influenced the identification procedure
I trust these police are rotting in jail.
.
.
.
Haaaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha haaaa!
**Lights Dunphy Signal**
Affects Graham Chapman's Upper Class Boring Pompous Voice
The fact that those people were exonerated shows that the system worked. Justice takes time, and police being human make the occasional mistake. For most people that interact with the criminal justice system, the more they interact with it, the more they approve of it.
"Well...well...as the Conservative candidate I just drone on and on and on and on without letting anyone else get a word in edgeways, until I start to froth at the mouth and fall over backwards."
"The Silly Party has gained a seat at Leicester!"
The chance that innocent people will be exonerated is closer to zerro than one percent. This is just the tip of an iceberg that has ruined far too many lives. The problem is the American people who trust authorities who hide evidence and use junk science to frame the innocent.
Cool story, bro.
Is zerro related to Zorro in any way?