Hit & Run

Your Domestic Drone News: Boeing Tested a Drone Capable of Staying in Flight For Four Days and the EPA is Using Drones to Observe Cattle (Hopefully)


The Los Angeles Times notes that Boeing Co. recently tested a new kind of hydrogen-propelled drone capable of staying in flight for four days. Currently most drones can stay aloft for about 30 hours, which is obviously already superior to manned aircraft. The Phantom Eye circled the Mohave Desert for 28 minutes on June 1, but then had a problem with the landing gear and broke on landing.

With a 150-foot wingspan and an egg-shaped fuselage, the drone was built at Boeing's Phantom Works complex in St. Louis with engineering support from its facilities in Huntington Beach. The drone is designed to spy over vast areas at an altitude of up to 65,000 feet.

"This day ushers in a new era of persistent intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance where an unmanned aircraft will remain on station for days at a time providing critical information and services," said Phantom Works President Darryl Davis in a statement. "This flight puts Boeing on a path to accomplish another aerospace first — the capability of four days of un-refueled, autonomous flight."

Unlike existing combat drones that are controlled remotely by a human pilot, the Phantom Eye could carry out a mission controlled almost entirely by a computer. A human pilot sitting miles away can design a flight path and sends it on its way, and a computer program guides it to the target and back.

The flight was powered by liquid hydrogen. Boeing says the fuel is a powerful alternative for vehicles that require endurance, and the combustion leaves only water in the atmosphere.

It took Boeing about four years to get the Phantom Eye to the runway, without the promise of a payout. Boeing does not have a contract on the drone; it is developing the craft at its own expense

There's obviously nothing inherently scary about this sort of thing — technology, freedom, etc. It would be nice if this just meant a cool new piece of technology that humans are having fun with. But considering the still-shaky status of drones and safety and not crashing, not to mention the domestic repercussions for technology that can let this baby hang out in the air for four days…It's a bit unnerving. Until we all have our drones and nobody has any privacy, of course.

Meanwhile, reported with great alarm on infowars, but originally noted on the more credible Fox News, there are reports that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is bothering Nebraskans with their drones:

A bipartisan group of Capitol Hill lawmakers is pressing EPA Director Lisa Jackson to answer questions about privacy issues and other concerns after the agency used aerial surveillance to monitor livestock operations over their home state of Nebraska.

"Farmers and ranchers in Nebraska pride themselves in the stewardship of our state's natural resources. As you might imagine, this practice has resulted in privacy concerns among our constituents and raises several questions," says the letter signed by Republican Reps. Adrian Smith, Jeff Fortenberry and Lee Terry, as well as Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson and GOP Sen. Mike Johanns.

Smith, co-chairman of the Modern Agriculture Caucus and the Congressional Rural Caucus, said Tuesday the operations in many cases are near homes so "landowners deserve legitimate justification given the sensitivity of the information gathered by the flyovers."

The letter asks nearly two-dozen questions including why the inspections are being conducted, how many flights have occurred and whether they have resulted in any enforcement activities.

"Nebraskans are rightfully skeptical of an agency which continues to unilaterally insert itself into the affairs of rural America," Smith added.

Check out Reason's other drone tales and let's all hope for the best.

NEXT: Ron Paul Chaos at Louisiana State GOP Convention; Ron Paul People (Probably) Win

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. These two stories put together make me want to kill myself.

    1. Don't kill yourelf yet. Hang out here long enough and you'll eventually just go numb from the nut punches.

  2. It's a bit unnerving. Until we all have our drones and nobody has any privacy, of course.

    Sorry, Lucy, it's still unnerving. I don't understand and have never understood the concept that universal lack of privacy is better than partial privacy. There are worlds that can be described that are not fit for human occupancy, and a world of universal surveillance is one of them.

  3. Lucy stop hiding your posts! Surely you have priority over this Eric Boehm character.

  4. Christ Jesus, what has your evolution wrought on this planet? Your insidious minions have now donned badges and pledges to protect 'Merican apple pies. Law brains are fucked from the get-go and god in heaven loves'em. So sez his churchy-babies. Fuck all that is Earth.

    1. The problem is that we circumvented evolution a long time ago. We're now doomed to mediocrity at best.

      1. Or we're evolving towards mediocrity. Evolution doesn't seek any particular goal other than survival.


        1. Anyone see IDIOCRACY? I think it was prophetic.
          Anyway, drone test flights are starting in FLA soon so says the Orlando Sentinel.

  5. The first step in monitoring alien contact is to watch the cows. I would think that would fall under the Air Force though and not the EPA.

    1. Of course if the drones have thermal imaging they could be monitoring cow flatuance which is even a greater threat then alien invasion.

  6. A bipartisan group of Capitol Hill lawmakers is pressing EPA Director Lisa Jackson to answer questions about privacy issues...

    Put away your limp dicks, Congress. You're embarrassing yourselves. Your oversight boners have atrophied from lack of use. You ain't doing shit about this.

    Anyway, you should embrace the drones. Get some yourselves. Maybe target some obese Americans before they become a drain on society. Or Mexicans. Or militia men. Whatever's hiding under the bed this month.

    1. Everyone is a potential terrorist. Why take chances. If you can save one life by killing everyone, man you are really making a difference out there hero.

    2. Drain on society? Ahem, I and my fellow rotundarians are key economic engines!

      1. I personally appreciate the low prices we enjoy on beer, pizza, and wings we enjoy due to the high demand.

  7. Sounds like a pretty good plan to me dude. Wow.


  8. "This is just feel-good legislation," says Beeber. "It's not going to solve any problems, but it makes people think that we've done something."

    Still, council member Tom LaBonge feels that he served his district well by outlawing plastic bags at grocery stores.

    "That one percent [of plastic bags in the waste stream] pollutes the river," says LaBonge. "You want to go out to the river with me? I'll show it to you."

  9. What gets me is the part about the drone's being hydrogen-propelled, leaving only water as exhaust. Why don't we get to use this technology in our cars, etc etc? I'm sure there's a simple reason why not...

    1. Exploding hydrogen tanks.

  10. The main problem with drones crashing is landing. There are solutions, they just have to be integrated. They aren't cheap necessarily.

  11. "Currently most drones can stay aloft for about 30 hours, which is obviously already superior to manned aircraft."

    Actually, Lucy, with aerial refueling (KC-135 and KC-10), we can keep our manned aircraft aloft for quite extended periods of time. I understand that the military is looking at aerial refueling for drones - possibly even unmanned aerial refueling aircraft or drones refueling drones (is that a sign of Skynet?).

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.