Phonehenge Architect Sentenced to Pay For Demolition, "See Dead People"
Kim Fahey, the retired phone company repairman who built a fantastic and whimsical fort known as "Phonehenge" out of old telephone poles in the middle of the Mojave Desert, has been sentenced to repay the $83,488 it cost the county to demolish his creation, reports the Washington Post:
Superior Court Judge Daviann L. Mitchell told Fahey that he must pay $50 a month in restitution. He ordered a July 27 progress report.
The 59-year-old retired phone company technician was convicted of a dozen misdemeanor building code violations. Fahey never got building permits for the structures, which included a 70-foot tower, and authorities said the compound was a danger.
In a more bizarre turn, the judge is also requiring Fahey to work for five days in the coroner's office. According to Fahey's defense attorney Jerry Lennon, the judge wanted to teach him a lesson about the potential deadly consequences of building unpermitted structures in the middle of the desert:
"The judge thought it was an extreme fire danger and I guess she just wanted him to see dead people," Lennon said.
Reason.tv highlighted Fahey's case in a video produced with LA Weekly's Mars Melnicoff, which examined Los Angeles County's code enforcement policies, particularly the seemingly arbitrary deployment of so-called Nuisance Abatement Teams (NATs) against citizens of the barren Antelope Valley.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
$83,488 it cost the county to demolish his creation
$83K?! I'll bet Obama could have taken it out with a Predator for half that!
Hellfire missiles cost $68,000, so with the mission costs it's probably a push.
Damn, one Hellfire costs that much?
This sort of thing even happens in Texas.
SF'd
Judges and bureaucrats. They're faaaaaaaaaaaaaan tastic.
Does this have something to do with high speed rail alignment going through antelope valley?
No but it does have something to do with Los Angeles metro area pushing out into the desert. It sort of looks like a ramping up of official harrasment in order to clear the way for development.
Lots of "code enforecement" going on in Antelope Valley and its pissing off a lot of people who moved there years ago to get away from that shit.
This is a terrific example of good government, showcasing precisely why the Founding generation engaged in armed insurrection against a global empire and established a constitutional republic of liberty by law -- so that municipalities and the judiciary could obliterate people's property and then force them to pay them for the act.
Wow.
In a more bizarre turn, the judge is also requiring Fahey to work for five days in the coroner's office.
Maybe that's not cruel, but it's definitely unusual.
Exactly my response. Most of the 8th amendment cases have dealt with purportedly cruel punishments; I'd love to see a case dealing with unusual ones.
Of course, it's not clear whether the 8th is supposed to ban cruel punishments and unusual punishments, or only punishments that are both cruel and unusual.
Interesting thought, but I have a hard time believing they meant it had to be both at the same time. Various forms of rough, capital punishments were not unusual, but by modern standards would be cruel.
It seems strange that they would only be considered unconstitutional if while being caned, they made you wear a funny hat.
Especially given how many of the founders were Freemasons.
"Fuck you, that's why."
Fool. Next time get an NEA grant.
WTF? I thought lefties were all about recyling and shit..
Forget it, Zach. It's just Chinatown.
The judge thought it was an extreme fire danger
So, their point is that wood in the desert is likely to burn? Better tear down all those other wooden structures out there too.
Plus, how is a potential fire in the middle of nowhere with no one around a danger to people?
http://articles.latimes.com/20.....t-20110526
"His closest neighbor is about 100 feet away."
No the point is do what you're told because the codes are written for your safety and never because some beaurocrat has to have something to put on his CV.
If this were a Home Owners Association forcing him to take it down, this would be a good thing, right?
Only if he voluntarily joined it and didn't get annexed.
Urge to kill, rising.
http://www.coachoutletonline-five.com
http://www.ccoachfactoryoutletonline.com