Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Judge Jim Gray Floats VP Run With Gary Johnson

Garrett Quinn | 4.29.2012 1:20 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The chatter surrounding a possible Libertarian vice-presidential candidacy by Judge Jim Gray of California just got an exclamation point on Gray's Facebook page. 

"What would you think of Judge Gray running for Vice President?" the Jim Gray page asked on Friday. 

The question is approaching 100 Likes and has received overwhelming positive responses. 

The Libertarian Party Convention is next week in Las Vegas, and according to organizers Gray has removed himself from the list of featured speakers at the convention because party rules limit candidates for national office to speaking during a specific part of the convention.  

Sources close to the Gary Johnson campaign have spoken favorably of a potential Gray candidacy. 

As of this time it does not appear there are any other candidates running for the VP slot. 

Gray, a trial court judge and attorney in Orange County, California since the 1980s, has run for federal office in his home state twice before — once as a Republican for Congress in 1998 and once as a Libertarian for U.S. Senate in 2004. He is an outspoken critic of the War on Drugs. 

More from Reason on Judge Jim Gray here and more on Gary Johnson here. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Tim Cavanaugh on the 20th Anniversary of the L.A. Riots

Garrett Quinn is a Boston-based journalist. He covered the 2012 presidential election for Reason.com.

PoliticsCampaigns/ElectionsElection 2012Presidential CandidatesLibertarianismLibertarian PartyCourtsGary Johnson
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (41)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Anacreon   13 years ago

    I don't know, I'm not a big fan of California politicians named Gray.

    1. Anacreon   13 years ago

      I guess no one remembers California's failed, recalled Governor Gray Davis, the man responsible for Arnold Schwarznegger becoming governor.

  2. Gannicus   13 years ago

    Its amazing how much better Johnson/Gray is than Barr/"scumbag what's his name" was.

    1. Amakudari   13 years ago

      Root.

      And Gray is also the only of them whose last name isn't a phallic euphemism. Progress.

      1. Joe M   13 years ago

        Heh, that reminds me of when a friend called the 2004 LP candidate Michael Bad-nerd-dick while punching his own crotch.

    2. rsi   13 years ago

      and unlike this guy?

  3. Killazontherun   13 years ago

    OT Obama at the correspondents dinner:

    What s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? A pit bull is delicious

    So, obviously you never went down on a hockey mom. Good way to perpetuate a stereo type about black men. As the wife of a black friend once told me regarding that very subject, 'He's lying.'

    1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      I thought that was just a Jamaican/West Indies thing.

      1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

        Also a Southern black thing, I can attest to many conversations in the locker rooms of both college and high school.

        1. deified   13 years ago

          RELEVANT

        2. deified   13 years ago

          RELEVANT

        3. deified   13 years ago

          Relevant

  4. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

    OT, but too tasty to let it pass:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....62632.html

    Poor Olbermann. Let's hope he doesn't commit suicide over this.

    /snark

    1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      Let's hope he doesn't commit suicide over this.

      Shut your mouth! Let's hope he does, in a particularly painful and gruesome way.

      1. Amakudari   13 years ago

        No, suicide would make me feel bad. A nice, slow suffering is would be enjoyable, though.

        1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

          The /snark at the end = I agree, HM.

    2. Joe M   13 years ago

      Anyone else find it disorienting to see him referred to as a "former Current TV host"?

      1. R   13 years ago

        Only because I didn't even know there WAS a Current TV until he got fired from it...

  5. Tman   13 years ago

    OT but I wanted to post-

    I was reading this Ross Douhat article about Japan Incredible Shrinking Country which is a reasonable analysis of the current issues facing Japan demographically.

    Then I read some of the comments to the article. The comments were mostly variations on ZOMGOVERPOPULATION!!! but there was one that spelled out these idiots perfectly that read

    "If the entire race were to become extinct the world would be a more peaceful place and cleaner as well."

    You first tough guy.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   13 years ago

      So when ant colonies go to war, or dolphins gang rape, or deer lock horns, it's because of humans?!?

      1. Mr. FIFY   13 years ago

        Fuckers like that commenter should be the first up against the wall, Tman.

      2. Tman   13 years ago

        That's the good kind of peaceful!

    2. Amakudari   13 years ago

      Thing is, were it not for the welfare state demographics would be the last of anyone's concerns. And Japan could actually use a smaller population. Not to save Gaia, but because land is expensive, economic growth is slow, and a given child becomes more expensive as a country develops. Japan's version of the Boomers compounds that, because women who take leave to rear children have almost no chance of returning to meaningful work, entry-level wages are abysmal (I know investment bankers making $25k), and national entitlements are beyond help. The younger generation faulted for not "paying their dues" understands the futility of those dues; the national pension will be shit when they retire.

      Yet the traditional stigma around out-of-wedlock childbearing endures

      Actually, a surprising number of marriages are centered around unplanned children. The difference is more that you don't have single moms, but I'd say that's a good thing.

      As for naturalization, I could live here for decades and never naturalize. You can get permanent residency just fine, but to become a citizen you have to renounce all other citizenships and change your name to something Japanese. Hell no. Immigration is low, but that's not a good example.

      1. Tman   13 years ago

        There's a difference between "smaller yet more manageable" and "suicidal".

        For instance Somalia has a fertility rate of 6.35 per woman, which is also unsustainable. Then you have some Eastern European nations that are in Japans range and are running out of people to support their aging populations.

        Anyone who has seen Tokyo and how dense it is can see that clearly space is an issue in Japan. But as you noted, the economic system cannot sustain the aging population, thus the younger generations aren't seeing the point in trying to "pay their dues", which isn't a good thing either.

        One thing is for sure though, the planet is not "dangerously overpopulated" nor is Japan. The malthusians in that comment section were just sad. Some were claiming that "hey, Ehrlich wasn't completely wrong in the Population bomb!".

        The idea that any one individual should make the judgment that others are having too many babies is fascist and contemptible.

        1. Amakudari   13 years ago

          Rest assured, Malthusians will be around until the Sun envelops the Earth. The evidence is sufficient to disprove Malthusianism, so it's not an issue of logic. It's the sense of profound guilt attending a comfortable life. And like those anticipating the imminent rapture, every generation will believe that they're the ones who will see the end.

          They're really quite unpleasant to talk to. To see their eyes light up discussing water shortages and global famine is deeply discomforting.

          1. yonemoto   13 years ago

            hey now.

            I'm a malthusian*. In fact, my assertion is that property rights (and libertarianism) are the only legitimate moral framework to handle the problem of scarce resources.

            *unless we manage to solve the one-planet problem.

            1. Amakudari   13 years ago

              I guess I should rephrase it to point to the kind of Malthusians who would impose the kind of solutions that would bring about the end of days, either through eugenics or consolidation of control over the environment by the monopolies of violence.

              1. yonemoto   13 years ago

                right, I should also point out that I am also a qualified malthusian in that I also think it's possible that humans will reach population equilibrium on its own, ending exponential growth. Indeed in the past decade or so, the exponential growth of human population has slacked a bit.

      2. Gannicus   13 years ago

        Amakudari--what do you do in Japan and how did you end up there?

        I've been a few times and can speak some Japanese and know some American expats there. It seems like a great country to live in from the point of view of an American expat making good money.

        1. Amakudari   13 years ago

          Just finished grad school and about to start work in financial services. I live in Kichijoji, which is really a beautiful area: nice, huge park and pond a block away, fast private rail, good schools (again, many private, esp. high schools), near-zero crime, etc. There are problems, some huge, but it shocks me when people think of Japan in dystopian terms.

  6. Adamson   13 years ago

    Oh lovely - a couple former Republicans who aren't terribly Libertarian. Gray wants California to tax and regulate marijuana, and Johnson thinks a 23% sales tax is just dandy. So much for voting Libertarian this year.

    1. CuriousGeorge   13 years ago

      You don't really understand how incrementalism works, do you?

      1. Alex   13 years ago

        Sure he does: the LP is incrementally being turned into a refuge for disaffected Republicans.

        1. Adamson   13 years ago

          Bingo, Alex.

  7. Robert   13 years ago

    If Johnson doesn't get the nom, is Gray prepared to run with whomever does?

    1. Adamson   13 years ago

      Johnson will get the nomination.

      Libertarians are so star-struck and desperate for attention that they'll throw the nomination at any formerly famous person who even glances their direction. He started the year running for the Presidential nomination of some *other* party. Heck, he'll probably ask us at some point to help pay off his Republican campaign debts!

  8. TheZeitgeist   13 years ago

    Almost a hundred likes on Facebook? Sounds like what Draw Something pulls down in...oh, they just did again.

    1. CuriousGeorge   13 years ago

      Well this is the only thing he's put up on his page...ever. The guy isn't exactly a force in social media.

    2. rsi   13 years ago

      WOW!! The intellectuals weigh in against Johnson!!

  9. RingoMooo   13 years ago

    That dude jsut looks corrupt as the day is long lol.

    http://www.Dodging-CISPA.tk

  10. John Balzer   13 years ago

    Picking Judge Gray for a running mate shows how great a president Gary Johnson could be. Gray is a solid and election proven Libertarian. The Johnson Gray 2012 ticket is sure to shake up the status quo come November.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

James Comey's Deleted '86 47' Instagram Post Is Obviously Protected by the First Amendment

Billy Binion | 5.16.2025 4:48 PM

New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment

Joe Lancaster | 5.16.2025 4:05 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Sapping Small Business Optimism

Autumn Billings | 5.16.2025 12:00 PM

Andor Is a Star Wars Show About the Brutality of Bureaucracy

Peter Suderman | 5.16.2025 10:10 AM

Quality Seeds

Liz Wolfe | 5.16.2025 9:31 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!