Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Ron Paul: The Candidate Who Wasn't There, Yet is Sticking Around

Brian Doherty | 4.25.2012 12:36 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Ron Paul is still running for president, and insists he'll continue to be until the Republican Party's convention in Tampa in 2012.

Where isn't Ron Paul?

*This CNN primary delegate chart.

*In this Townhall.com "Veepstakes" poll.

*In this robocall to GOP voters in New York from Vincent Reda, First Vice Chairman of the New York Republican State Committee, claiming that the "the other candidates have dropped out of the race," as reported in Digital Journal.

*And while this chart is no longer there as of this morning, the Cato Institute's David Boaz reported on Facebook last night that:

The Washington Post has a graphic on its homepage and on its Politics homepage reporting the results from Tuesday's 5 Republican primaries. In every state Romney won big, followed by Santorum, Gingrich, and "other" -- and oddly enough, "other" ran second in 3 of the 5 states. Gosh, who could that "other" candidate be? And why wasn't the candidate who ran second in most of the states listed in the Post graphic?

That chart being gone from both front page and politics page, at noon the day after five major primaries, is in and of itself an interesting sign of how quickly news is no longer news in the modern world. (It isn't that they've added Paul to such a results chart; it just isn't news anymore.)

UPDATE: The original chart, via Chris Braly's twitter.

In yesterday's votes, this mystery candidate Paul got these percentages: Rhode Island: 24 percent, New York: 17 percent, Connecticut: 13 percent, Pennsylvania: 13 percent, and Delaware: 11 percent. He beat Newt Gingrich in every state but Delaware; Gingrich is likely dropping out this week.

The Daily Beast on the meaning of Paul's pull yesterday and the Paul campaign's long game, longer than 2012:

The five states holding primaries on Tuesday—Connecticut, Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island—were all prime turf for Romney: heavily urbanized, high-Catholic populations with comparatively moderate Republican electorates. Romney did as well as expected, running the table in Connecticut and New York, and successfully ending Newt Gingrich's campaign by seizing the winner-take-all state of Delaware. But, in Rhode Island's proportional race and Pennsylvania's loophole primary, Ron Paul managed to slip in and grab delegates. In fact, Paul is expected to finish second in the overall delegate haul for the night despite investing almost no effort in the states contested.

Paul is focusing on accumulating delegates slowly but surely. As Rick Santorum noted in his CNN interview with Piers Morgan, "Ron Paul is working the delegates really hard. I can tell you that." In fact, Paul's strategy to work the convoluted process in caucus states has him in the catbird's seat in states Santorum won on caucus night, like Iowa and Minnesota.

The next step for the campaign is to try to maximize Paul's performance in his home state of Texas, which has a totally proportional primary on May 29. Paul spokesman Jesse Benton…acknowledged the increasing possibility that Paul would not be the GOP nominee, but made clear that the "secondary goal of all of our political action [has been] getting limited-government, libertarian-leaning folks involved and taking over the party apparatus."

Blogging by me in January that touches on the Paul media blackout. My forthcoming book, Ron Paul's Revolution.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Secret Service Scandal: They Transgressed the Unwritten Law

Brian Doherty is a senior editor at Reason and author of Ron Paul's Revolution: The Man and the Movement He Inspired (Broadside Books).

PoliticsLibertarian History/PhilosophyRon PaulNewt GingrichRepublican Presidential NominationElection 2012
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (32)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. o3   13 years ago

    it'll be berry berry interesting how the gop treats dr paul at the convention (keynote?). and as interesting to see if he then would endorse romney & how the paulites react.

    1. Episiarch   13 years ago

      What valuable insight, Mary. Thanks.

      1. fish   13 years ago

        Are you sure that triple anus (although it would be fitting) is indeed one Mary Stack?

        1. o3   13 years ago

          in epi's raging delusion. for one thing, mary never spoke hispanic like i did in the above post...plus ft worth has teh hot sucks

          1. fish   13 years ago

            Shut up Mary.

            1. o3   13 years ago

              script ))

    2. tarran   13 years ago

      Paul is not going to be endorsing Romney unless Romney adopts many of his ideas.

      Since Romney is politically speaking a new england progressive who loves big government helping big business it is highly unlikely to happen.

      1. Mongo   13 years ago

        An article in the local newspaper by a state GOP activist says that the Minnesota delegates will vote for Paul in the Tampa convention.

        It sounds like the Republican party cooked the books when Rmoney "won" the state's primary here.

        1. Surly Chef   13 years ago

          Minnesota is a caucus and as such the "primary" is essentially just a poll. The delegates sent to convention are what matter, but since they aren't bound by the caucus poll they could conceivably vote for whomever they wish in June. So yes Romneybot did win Minnesota. Despite the spin about the delegates by anyone, what they do later this year is still anyone's guess.

          1. Mongo   13 years ago

            According to the article, they'll cast their votes for Romney if Rand Paul is the VP choice.

            1. Surly Chef   13 years ago

              Ugh. As if the VP really means much of anything.

        2. Joe M   13 years ago

          Santorum won the popular vote in Minnesota, not Romney.

          1. Mongo   13 years ago

            Yep - I fergot.

  2. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    Rush 2112!

    1. Cyto   13 years ago

      I watched a decent documentary on the making of 2112 (and Moving Pictures) on netflix the other night. The band members explain where the Rand influences came from and why they were drawn to the long-format concept songs.

      1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        I'll have to check that out. Thanks.

  3. Suki   13 years ago

    Brian must be running out of words. This RP post is like 1/4 the length of his regular RP posts.

  4. kinnath   13 years ago

    Paul supporters hold the chair and at least half the committee slots in the Iowa state central committee.

    I'm pretty sure that all the Paul supporters sitting on the central committee know that Paul won't be the nominee in 2012. But that's not really the point of taking over the central committee is it?

    1. kinnath   13 years ago

      robc, it you get a chance would you please collect DNA samples from Rand Paul. The chair of the Iowa central committee can provide you with a mailing address.

      We need to start growing our clone for the 2014 campaign against Tom Harkin.

      1. robc   13 years ago

        I think SugarFree is more likely to come up with DNA samples.

        May not be from Rand. Or something you want to deal with.

        1. kinnath   13 years ago

          At this point, anything grown from the random DNA that SugarFree can supply is probably better than Tom.

      2. robc   13 years ago

        Im pretty sure a clone wouldnt be senate-eligible until 2042.

        Probably easier to talk one of Ron's kids or grandkids into moving to Iowa.

        1. kinnath   13 years ago

          S. R. Donaldson taught us the secret of force-growing an infant into an adult. We should be able to hit the filing deadline if we start soon.

        2. kinnath   13 years ago

          I'm not sure we can actually convince anyone to move to Iowa.

  5. 0x90   13 years ago

    The townhall webpage doesn't work right. I tried to drag all of those politicians into the recycle bin, but they refused to go. I guess, though, what did I expect? They're politicians.

  6. BBB   13 years ago

    Where did the Daily Beast get their talking points? " heavily urbanized, high-Catholic populations" with regard to Pennsylvania?

    Hmm. First look at this population density map of Pennsylvania:
    http://bit.ly/IbBLcp That's "heavily urbanized" in two or three places.

    The state's population is about 12.7 million. Of those, 1.55 million are in Philadelphia, 300k are in Pittsburgh, 100k each in Allentown and Erie, and 75k in Scranton. That means like 10 million people DON'T live in a particularly large city in Pennsylvania. "Heavily urbanized"?

    Outside the cities listed above, the Roman Catholic presence is minimal. Most of Pennsylvania's religious scene is dominated by liberal, mainline Protestants (ELCA, UCC, etc.), Mennonites, and, in rural counties, Amish.

    Blair County (total population: 127,000) cast approximately 12,000 votes in the Republican primary, compared to 18,000 in Philadelphia County, with over 10 times the population.

    And almost 20% of the PA primary votes were to a man who's not even in the race any more.

  7. Loki   13 years ago

    MSM: Who is this "Ron Paul" of whom you speak?

  8. Emmerson Biggins   13 years ago

    They screwed us in Texas this year. No precinct conventions. Just county conventions. So if you wanted to be involved you couldn't just do a 2 hour meeting, you had to do an all day meeting.

  9. ant1sthenes   13 years ago

    The Washington Post has a graphic on its homepage and on its Politics homepage reporting the results from Tuesday's 5 Republican primaries. In every state Romney won big, followed by Santorum, Gingrich, and "other" -- and oddly enough, "other" ran second in 3 of the 5 states.

    When they subjected Ron Paul to that particular microaggression, I wonder how it made him feel.

  10. I3ladeDragon   13 years ago

    The election is being rigged. Proof:

    http://bit.ly/JrsZCx

    http://bit.ly/IxqKAe

    Unfortunately, this site only allows 2 links in the comments. I have 2 more videos of caucuses being tampered with.

  11. I3ladeDragon   13 years ago

    http://bit.ly/Ixr16d

    http://bit.ly/Ib3Ddh

  12. Friends@freeagent   13 years ago

    Its time to take back our government and make a change for our Freedom. If you believe the same and limited government become a free agent. visit freeagent.cc

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Judge Orders Tufts Grad Student Rumeysa Ozturk Be Released on Bail From Immigration Detention

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.9.2025 3:17 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!